Literature DB >> 10985889

Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?

G H Eltabbakh1, M I Shamonki, J M Moody, L L Garafano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic management of obese women with early stage endometrial cancer and to compare the surgical outcome, cost, hospital stay, recall of postoperative pain control, time to return to full activity and to work, and overall satisfaction among these women and those managed by laparotomy.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study over 2 years applying laparoscopic surgery to all women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer and body mass indices (BMIs) between 28.0 and 60.0 who can tolerate such surgery. As a control, we used women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer and similar BMIs who underwent laparotomy in the previous 2 years. Both groups were compared in their characteristics, surgical outcome, cost, and hospital stay, and interviewed regarding time to recovery, recall of postoperative pain control, and overall satisfaction with their management.
RESULTS: Forty of 42 obese women who presented with clinical stage I endometrial cancer during the study period were offered laparoscopic surgery. The procedure was converted to laparotomy in 3 (7.5%) patients. Laparoscopic surgery was thus successful in 88.1% of all obese women. There was no significant difference between women who underwent laparoscopy and those who underwent laparotomy in patient characteristics, proportion of women who underwent lymphadenectomy, complications, total cost, patients' recall of postoperative pain, and patients' satisfaction with management. Women who underwent laparoscopy had a significantly longer operative time, more pelvic lymph nodes removed, a smaller drop in postoperative hematocrit, less pain medication, and a shorter hospital stay (194.8 versus 137.7 min, P <0.001; 11.3 versus 5.3, P < 0.001; 3.9 versus 5.4, P = 0.029; 32.3 versus 124.1 mg, P < 0.001; and 2.5 versus 5.6 days, P < 0.001, respectively). There was a trend toward earlier resumption of full activity and return to work among women who underwent laparoscopy (23.2 versus 45.0 days, P = 0.073, and 35.3 versus 67.0 days, P = 0.055, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Most obese women with early stage endometrial cancer can be safely managed through laparoscopy with excellent surgical outcome, shorter hospitalization, and less postoperative pain than those managed through laparotomy. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10985889     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a prospective randomized study with 11-year experience.

Authors:  Qi Lu; Haiyan Liu; Chongdong Liu; Shuzhen Wang; Shuhong Li; Shuli Guo; Junli Lu; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women.

Authors:  Sonia A Rebeles; Howard G Muntz; Carrie Wieneke-Broghammer; Emily S Vason; Kathryn F McGonigle
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-08-26

3.  Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.

Authors:  Mete Gungor; Korhan Kahraman; Polat Dursun; Esra Ozbasli; Canan Genim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-20

4.  A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Reshu Agarwal; Anupama Rajanbabu; U G Unnikrishnan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

5.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: comparison of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Gary S Leiserowitz; Guibo Xing; Arti Parikh-Patel; Rosemary Cress; Alireza Abidi; Anne O Rodriguez; John L Dalrymple
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  N Nevadunsky; R Clark; S Ghosh; M Muto; R Berkowitz; A Vitonis; C Feltmate
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

7.  Effect of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy--comparison with open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamada; Kazuyuki Kojima; Mikito Inokuchi; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Feasibility and safety of sequential research-related tumor core biopsies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jung-min Lee; John L Hays; Anne M Noonan; Jennifer Squires; Lori Minasian; Christina Annunziata; Bradford J Wood; Minshu Yu; Katherine R Calvo; Nicole Houston; Nilofer Azad; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight?

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Shimizu; Eishi Nagai; Kenoki Ohuchida; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of endometrial carcinoma in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Özgür Bige; Ahmet Demir; Bahadır Saatli; Meral Koyuncuoğlu; Uğur Saygılı
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.