| Literature DB >> 28427467 |
Anayt Ulla1, Mustafe Khalid Mohamed1, Biswajit Sikder1, Afm Towheedur Rahman1, Farzana Akther Sumi1, Murad Hossain1, Hasan Mahmud Reza2, G M Sayedur Rahman1, Md Ashraful Alam3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study aimed to investigate the effect of CoQ10 treatment on isoprenaline (ISO)-induced cardiac remodeling in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Co-enzyme Q10; Fibrosis; Heart; Mitochondria; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28427467 PMCID: PMC5399319 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-017-0136-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Effect of Co-Q10 on body weight, and organ wet weight of ISO treated rats
| Parameters | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | ISO | ISO + CoQ10 | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 234.80 ± 19.31 ns | 252.02 ± 6.57 ns | 252.56 ± 7.91 ns |
| Final body Weight (g) | 266.53 ± 19.56 ns | 249.55 ± 7.91 ns | 266.21 ± 9.97 ns |
| Heart Wet Weight (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.26 ± 0.01 ns | 0.37 ± 0.01 ns | 0.32 ± 0.01 ns |
| LV(g/100 g of body weight) | 0.21 ± 0.01a | 0.29 ± 0.01b | 0.23 ± 0.01a |
| RV(g/100 g of body weight) | 0.04 ± 0.00 ns | 0.05 ± 0.01 ns | 0.05 ± 0.01 ns |
| Kidney(g/100 g of body weight) | 0.54 ± 0.02a | 0.64 ± 0.02b | 0.55 ± 0.02a |
| Spleen(g/100 g of body weight) | 0.33 ± 0.02 ns | 0.34 ± 0.01 ns | 0.30 ± 0.01 ns |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistical analysis was done as One way ANOVA with Newman Keuls test as post hoc test, which was conducted using Prism software (USA). a vs b is significantly different at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs ISO or ISO vs ISO + CoQ10. Others are not significant
Effect of Co-Q10 on biochemical parameters in ISO induced aged rats
| Parameters | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | ISO | ISO + CoQ10 | |
| Plasma | |||
| AST (U/L) | 29.29 ± 4.39a | 51.68 ± 4.72b | 33.02 ± 3.46a |
| ALT (U/L) | 33.02 ± 4.67a | 78.96 ± 18.79b | 44.50 ± 6.06a |
| ALP (U/L) | 57.60 ± 4.88a | 82.15 ± 5.85b | 60.67 ± 3.11a |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 78.51 ± 6.12a | 174.54 ± 6.11b | 101.72 ± 10.89a |
| NO (nmol/mL) | 3.82 ± 0.25a | 11.12 ± 1.69b | 6.82 ± 0.55a |
| APOP (nmol/mL equivalent to Chloramine-T) | 229.13 ± 10.64a | 382.30 ± 31.75b | 200.16 ± 19.43a |
| Catalase (U/min) | 22.50 ± 4.23a | 10.00 ± 1.83b | 15.00 ± 2.58a |
| GSH (ng/mg protein) | 11.59 ± 0.46 ns | 7.16 ± 0.53 ns | 13.65 ± 0.53 ns |
| CK-MB (U/L) | 136.11 ± 19.44a | 299.44 ± 31.55b | 151.67 ± 34.48a |
| Uric Acid (μmol/L) | 5.02 ± 0.52a | 10.65 ± 0.75b | 7.82 ± 0.56b |
| Creatinin (μmol/L) | 1.36 ± 0.10a | 2.34 ± 0.19b | 1.52 ± 0.03b |
| Heart | |||
| MDA (nmol/gm tissue) | 52.62 ± 3.96a | 102.62 ± 4.40b | 80.56 ± 6.10a |
| NO (nmol/gm tissue) | 13.26 ± 0.64 ns | 15.49 ± 1.06 ns | 8.38 ± 0.28 ns |
| APOP (nmol/gm tissue equivalent to Chloramine-T) | 624.13 ± 29.80a | 924.92 ± 107.66b | 569.37 ± 38.78a |
| Catalase (U/min) | 145.83 ± 18.68a | 83.33 ± 8.82b | 94.17 ± 6.38a |
| GSH (ng/mg protein) | 12.47 ± 0.44 ns | 9.38 ± 0.81 ns | 16.77 ± 1.04 ns |
| Kidney | |||
| MDA (nmol/gm tissue) | 40.31 ± 0.79a | 85.82 ± 2.55b | 66.85 ± 2.01b |
| NO (nmol/gm tissue) | 21.54 ± 1.43a | 33.82 ± 2.38b | 18.77 ± 2.30a |
| APOP (nmol/gm tissue equivalent to Chloramine-T) | 711.43 ± 20.75a | 1143.97 ± 96.08b | 911.43 ± 68.81b |
| Catalase (U/min) | 36.67 ± 5.11a | 16.67 ± 2.47b | 29.17 ± 2.71a |
| GSH (ng/mg protein) | 17.94 ± 0.42 ns | 12.84 ± 0.57 ns | 15.05 ± 2.42 ns |
| Urine | |||
| Control | ISO | ISO + COQ10 | |
| Uric Acid (μmol/L) | 6.02 ± 0.06a | 9.42 ± 0.26b | 7.13 ± 0.25a |
| Creatinin (μmol/L) | 8.16 ± 0.75a | 17.75 ± 2.32b | 7.03 ± 1.18a |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistical analysis was done as One way ANOVA with Newman Keuls test as post hoc test, which was conducted using Prism software (USA).). a vs b is significantly different at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs ISO or ISO vs ISO + CoQ10. Others are not significant
Fig. 1Effect of Co-Q10 treatment on cardiac inflammation (Upper Panel, arrow head- inflammatory cells infiltration) and fibrosis (Lower panel, arrow head- collagen deposition) in ISO administered rats. a, d- Control; b, e- ISO; c, f- ISO + CO-Q10. g, % of fibrosis among groups. Magnification 40 X. Asterisk mark is significantly different at p < 0.05. Control vs ISO or ISO vs ISO + CoQ10. Others are not significant
Fig. 2Effect of Co-Q10 treatment on glomerular structure (Upper Panel, arrow head- podycyte damage, shrinkage of glomerulus) and fibrosis (Lower panel, arrow head- collagen deposition) in kidneys of ISO administered rats. a, d- Control; b, e- ISO; c, f- ISO + CO-Q10. g, % of fibrosis among groups. Magnification 40 X. Asterisk mark is significantly different at p < 0.05. Control vs ISO or ISO vs ISO + CoQ10. Others are not significant
Fig. 3Effect of Co-Q10 treatment on iron deposition (Arrow head) in kidneys of ISO administered rats. a- Control; b- ISO; c- ISO + CO-Q10. Magnification 40 X