AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: An increase in the production of reactive oxygen species is commonly thought to contribute to the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to assess whether administration of the antioxidant coenzyme Q(10) would protect the diabetic heart against dysfunction and remodelling, using the db/db mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of coenzyme Q(10) to that of the ACE inhibitor ramipril. METHODS: Six-week-old non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice received either normal drinking water or water supplemented with coenzyme Q(10) for 10 weeks. Endpoint cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and catheterisation. Ventricular tissue was collected for histology, gene expression and protein analysis. RESULTS: Untreated db/db diabetic mice exhibited hyperglycaemia, accompanied by diastolic dysfunction and adverse structural remodelling, including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis and increased apoptosis. Systemic lipid peroxidation and myocardial superoxide generation were also elevated in db/db mice. Coenzyme Q(10) and ramipril treatment reduced superoxide generation, ameliorated diastolic dysfunction and reduced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis in db/db mice. Phosphorylation of Akt, although depressed in untreated db/db mice, was restored with coenzyme Q(10) administration. We postulate that preservation of cardioprotective Akt signalling may be a mechanism by which coenzyme Q(10)-treated db/db mice are protected from pathological cardiac hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These data demonstrate that coenzyme Q(10) attenuates oxidative stress and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and remodelling in the diabetic heart. Addition of coenzyme Q(10) to the current therapy used in diabetic patients with diastolic dysfunction warrants further investigation.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: An increase in the production of reactive oxygen species is commonly thought to contribute to the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to assess whether administration of the antioxidant coenzyme Q(10) would protect the diabetic heart against dysfunction and remodelling, using the db/db mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of coenzyme Q(10) to that of the ACE inhibitor ramipril. METHODS: Six-week-old non-diabetic db/+ mice and diabetic db/db mice received either normal drinking water or water supplemented with coenzyme Q(10) for 10 weeks. Endpoint cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and catheterisation. Ventricular tissue was collected for histology, gene expression and protein analysis. RESULTS: Untreated db/db diabeticmice exhibited hyperglycaemia, accompanied by diastolic dysfunction and adverse structural remodelling, including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis and increased apoptosis. Systemic lipid peroxidation and myocardial superoxide generation were also elevated in db/db mice. Coenzyme Q(10) and ramipril treatment reduced superoxide generation, ameliorated diastolic dysfunction and reduced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis in db/db mice. Phosphorylation of Akt, although depressed in untreated db/db mice, was restored with coenzyme Q(10) administration. We postulate that preservation of cardioprotective Akt signalling may be a mechanism by which coenzyme Q(10)-treated db/db mice are protected from pathological cardiac hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These data demonstrate that coenzyme Q(10) attenuates oxidative stress and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and remodelling in the diabetic heart. Addition of coenzyme Q(10) to the current therapy used in diabeticpatients with diastolic dysfunction warrants further investigation.
Authors: Karina Huynh; Julie R McMullen; Tracey L Julius; Joon Win Tan; Jane E Love; Nelly Cemerlang; Helen Kiriazis; Xiao-Jun Du; Rebecca H Ritchie Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: R H Ritchie; J M Quinn; A H Cao; G R Drummond; D M Kaye; J M Favaloro; J Proietto; L M D Delbridge Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2007-03-27 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Willmann Liang; Calista Y R Tan; Lisa Ang; Nada Sallam; David J Granville; James M Wright; Ismail Laher Journal: J Physiol Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Stephan Lüders; Joachim Schrader; Jürgen Berger; Thomas Unger; Walter Zidek; Michael Böhm; Martin Middeke; Wolfgang Motz; Cornelia Lübcke; Andrea Gansz; Ludmer Brokamp; Roland E Schmieder; Peter Trenkwalder; Herrmann Haller; Peter Dominiak Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Mark T Waddingham; Amanda J Edgley; Hirotsugu Tsuchimochi; Darren J Kelly; Mikiyasu Shirai; James T Pearson Journal: World J Diabetes Date: 2015-07-10
Authors: Rebecca H Ritchie; Chen Huei Leo; Chengxue Qin; Erin J Stephenson; Marissa A Bowden; Keith D Buxton; Sarah J Lessard; Donato A Rivas; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; John A Hawley; Owen L Woodman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 4.733