| Literature DB >> 30526612 |
Xiaoqing Zhang1, Hongyang Liu2, Yuhua Hao1, Lulu Xu1, Tiemei Zhang1, Yingshu Liu3, Lipeng Guo4, Liyue Zhu5, Zuowei Pei6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia is a well-established risk factor for cardiac damage, which can lead to cardiovascular diseases. Many studies have shown that Coenzyme Q10(CoQ10) protects against cardiac damage in vivo. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible protective effects of CoQ10 against cardiac damage in apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30526612 PMCID: PMC6286539 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0928-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Primer oligonucleotide sequences
| Gene | Primers |
|---|---|
| P62 | F: 5′-TCCCAATGTCAATTTCCTGAAGA-3′ |
| R: 5′- TCTGTGCCTGTGCTGGAACT-3′ | |
| LC3 | F: 5′-AGCTGCCTGTCCTGGATAAGAC-3′ |
| R: 5′- GGTGTGGAGACGCTCACCAT-3′ | |
| IL-6 | F:5′-TACCAGTTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGA-3′ |
| R:5′-TAAGCCTCCGACTTGTGAAGTGGT-3′ | |
| TNF-α | F:5′-TCTCATGCACCACCATCAAGGACT-3′ |
| R:5′-ACCACTCTCCCTTTGCAGAACTCA-3′ | |
| β-actin | F:5′-CGATGCCCTGAGGGTCTTT-3′ |
| R:5′-TGGATGCCACAGGATTCCAT-3′ |
Abbreviations: IL-6 interleukin- 6, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α
Metabolic data from the four groups after 16 weeks of different treatment
| C57BL/6 ( | C57BL/6 + CoQ10 ( | ApoE−/− HD ( | ApoE−/− HD + CoQ10 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (mg) | 24.53 ± 2.03 | 25.32 ± 1.96 | 31.31 ± 3.51 | 28.55 ± 1.16 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 8.72 ± 0.20** | 7.58 ± 0.17** | 27.20 ± 2.68 | 12.21 ± 2.87* |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.48 ± 0.08** | 0.53 ± 0.04** | 2.29 ± 0.18 | 1.17 ± 0.09* |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 7.60 ± 2.24** | 7.10 ± 2.83** | 24.62 ± 0.77 | 9.70 ± 0.2** |
Abbreviations: BW body weight, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Data are means ± SEM; n = 10 per group. * P < 0.05 vs ApoE−/−HD; ** P < 0.01 vs ApoE−/−HD
Fig. 1Effect of CoQ10 on hyperlipidemia-induced histopathological changes in cardiac tissues. Histopathological changes were evaluated by H&E, PAS, and Masson’s trichrome staining in the cardiac tissue of mice with different treatment (n = 5). Scale bar = 100 μm. The arrows indicate damage
Fig. 2Pro-inflammatory gene expression in the cardiac tissue of the four groups of mice after 16 weeks on different diets. Relative mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in the cardiac tissue of each group after 16 weeks under different treatments. Data are given as the means ± SEM; n = 6 in each group. * P < 0.01 vs. ApoE−/− HD
Fig. 3CD68 expression in cardiac tissues of the four groups after 16 weeks under different treatments. Representative immunohistochemical staining for CD68 expression in cardiac tissue of mice with different treatment (n = 5). Scale bar = 100 μm. Arrows indicate positively stained cells
Fig. 4P62 and LC3 expression in cardiac tissues of the four groups after 16 weeks under different treatments. a Representative immunohistochemistry for p62 and LC3 in cardiac tissues. Scale bar = 100 μm. Arrows indicate positively stained cells. b Relative mRNA expression of p62 and LC3 in cardiac tissue of each group after 16 weeks under different treatments. c Immunoblotting for p62 0061nd LC3 in cardiac tissues. d Bar graph showing quantification of p62 and LC3 protein expression. Data are given as the means ± SEM; n = 5–6 in each group. * P < 0.05 vs. ApoE−/− HD
Fig. 5Phospho-ERK expression in the cardiac tissues of the four groups after 16 weeks under different treatments. a Immunoblotting for phospho-ERK and total ERK levels expression in cardiac tissues. b Bar graph shows the quantification of phospho-ERK/total ERK protein levels. Data are given as the means ± SEM; n = 3 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs ApoE−/−HD