Mehool Shukla1, Robert Keller2, Nathan Marshall3, Hafeez Ahmed4, Courtney Scher5, Vasilios Bill Moutzouros6, Marnix van Holsbeeck7. 1. Nassau University Medical Center, 2nd floor, 2201 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow, NY, 11554, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA. Nmarsha2@hfhs.org. 4. X-Ray Associates of Port Huron, P.C, 411 Grand River Ave., Ste. A, Port Huron, MI, 48060, USA. 5. Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, E-328, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Henry Ford Medical Group, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA. 7. Division Head and Senior Staff Radiologist, Musculoskeletal Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, E-328, Detroit, MI, 48202-2689, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is an important medial stabilizer of the elbow, particularly in overhead-throwing athletes. However, there is no universally accepted method for evaluating UCL thickness with ultrasound (US). OBJECTIVE: To assess reproducibility of previously published methods, as well as a modified technique, for evaluating the UCL via US. We hypothesize that a modified technique would show greater reproducibility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using US, the thickness of the UCL in 50 volunteers was measured by two musculoskeletal trained radiologists using two different measurement techniques. The techniques utilized were as described by Nazarian and Jacobson/Ward (JW). Technique measurements were evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to determine the reproducibility of each method. Twenty-eight of the subjects also underwent measurement via a modified JW technique, measured perpendicular to the ligament rather than the frame of imaging. This technique was also evaluated with ICC values. RESULTS: The ICC value for the Nazarian technique was 0.82 (very good) and 0.51 (moderate) for the JW technique. When using the modified JW technique, we found an ICC value of 0.84 (very good). Mean ligament thickness was greatest with the Nazarian technique, 6.41 mm, with the JW technique measuring 1.86 mm and the modified technique measuring 1.38 mm. CONCLUSION: US assessment of UCL thickness by all three measurement techniques are reproducible. The JW technique had less interobserver agreement when compared to the Nazarian method, whereas the modified JW technique had greater reproducibility compared to the JW technique and similar to the Nazarian technique.
INTRODUCTION: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is an important medial stabilizer of the elbow, particularly in overhead-throwing athletes. However, there is no universally accepted method for evaluating UCL thickness with ultrasound (US). OBJECTIVE: To assess reproducibility of previously published methods, as well as a modified technique, for evaluating the UCL via US. We hypothesize that a modified technique would show greater reproducibility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using US, the thickness of the UCL in 50 volunteers was measured by two musculoskeletal trained radiologists using two different measurement techniques. The techniques utilized were as described by Nazarian and Jacobson/Ward (JW). Technique measurements were evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to determine the reproducibility of each method. Twenty-eight of the subjects also underwent measurement via a modified JW technique, measured perpendicular to the ligament rather than the frame of imaging. This technique was also evaluated with ICC values. RESULTS: The ICC value for the Nazarian technique was 0.82 (very good) and 0.51 (moderate) for the JW technique. When using the modified JW technique, we found an ICC value of 0.84 (very good). Mean ligament thickness was greatest with the Nazarian technique, 6.41 mm, with the JW technique measuring 1.86 mm and the modified technique measuring 1.38 mm. CONCLUSION: US assessment of UCL thickness by all three measurement techniques are reproducible. The JW technique had less interobserver agreement when compared to the Nazarian method, whereas the modified JW technique had greater reproducibility compared to the JW technique and similar to the Nazarian technique.
Keywords:
Elbow ultrasound; Tommy John; Ulnar collateral ligament; Ultrasound
Authors: Sabrina I Ward; Sharlene A Teefey; George A Paletta; William D Middleton; Charles F Hildebolt; David A Rubin; Ken Yamaguchi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Alfred Atanda; Patrick S Buckley; Sommer Hammoud; Steven B Cohen; Levon N Nazarian; Michael G Ciccotti Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jeffrey R Dugas; Roger V Ostrander; E Lyle Cain; David Kingsley; James R Andrews Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2007-06-20 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Levon N Nazarian; John M McShane; Michael G Ciccotti; Patrick L O'Kane; Marc I Harwood Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nakul Gupta; John S Labis; Joshua Harris; Michael A Trakhtenbroit; Leif E Peterson; Robert A Jack; Patrick C McCulloch Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-06
Authors: Romain Bilger; Pierre Laumonerie; Hugo Barret; Franck Lapègue; Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Sans; Marie Faruch-Bilfeld Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Lafi S Khalil; Toufic R Jildeh; Muhammad J Abbas; Chad L Klochko; Courtney Scher; Marnix Van Holsbeeck; Stephanie J Muh; Eric C Makhni; Vasilios Moutzouros; Kelechi R Okoroha Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-10-09
Authors: Michael J Kissenberth; Charles A Thigpen; Lane Brooks Bailey; Joel Campbell; Derik J Geist; Mark L Schweppe; Douglas J Wyland; Richard J Hawkins; Thomas J Noonan; Ellen Shanley Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-11-01
Authors: Lafi S Khalil; Kelechi R Okoroha; Toufic R Jildeh; Robert N Matar; Mohsin S Fidai; Joseph S Tramer; Chase Ansok; Courtney Scher; Marnix Van Holsbeeck; Eric C Makhni; Vasilios Moutzouros Journal: JSES Open Access Date: 2019-10-15