Literature DB >> 28424849

Ultrasound evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: Which method is most reproducible?

Mehool Shukla1, Robert Keller2, Nathan Marshall3, Hafeez Ahmed4, Courtney Scher5, Vasilios Bill Moutzouros6, Marnix van Holsbeeck7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is an important medial stabilizer of the elbow, particularly in overhead-throwing athletes. However, there is no universally accepted method for evaluating UCL thickness with ultrasound (US).
OBJECTIVE: To assess reproducibility of previously published methods, as well as a modified technique, for evaluating the UCL via US. We hypothesize that a modified technique would show greater reproducibility.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using US, the thickness of the UCL in 50 volunteers was measured by two musculoskeletal trained radiologists using two different measurement techniques. The techniques utilized were as described by Nazarian and Jacobson/Ward (JW). Technique measurements were evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to determine the reproducibility of each method. Twenty-eight of the subjects also underwent measurement via a modified JW technique, measured perpendicular to the ligament rather than the frame of imaging. This technique was also evaluated with ICC values.
RESULTS: The ICC value for the Nazarian technique was 0.82 (very good) and 0.51 (moderate) for the JW technique. When using the modified JW technique, we found an ICC value of 0.84 (very good). Mean ligament thickness was greatest with the Nazarian technique, 6.41 mm, with the JW technique measuring 1.86 mm and the modified technique measuring 1.38 mm.
CONCLUSION: US assessment of UCL thickness by all three measurement techniques are reproducible. The JW technique had less interobserver agreement when compared to the Nazarian method, whereas the modified JW technique had greater reproducibility compared to the JW technique and similar to the Nazarian technique.

Keywords:  Elbow ultrasound; Tommy John; Ulnar collateral ligament; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424849     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2656-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

1.  Sonography of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow: a study of cadavers and healthy adult male volunteers.

Authors:  Sabrina I Ward; Sharlene A Teefey; George A Paletta; William D Middleton; Charles F Hildebolt; David A Rubin; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Ulnar collateral ligament injury in the overhead athlete.

Authors:  Sanaz Hariri; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.182

3.  Early Anatomic Changes of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament Identified by Stress Ultrasound of the Elbow in Young Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Authors:  Alfred Atanda; Patrick S Buckley; Sommer Hammoud; Steven B Cohen; Levon N Nazarian; Michael G Ciccotti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Evaluation of the thickness of the medial ulnar collateral ligament in junior high and high school baseball players.

Authors:  Hideaki Nagamoto; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Daisuke Kurokawa; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Takayuki Muraki; Minoru Tanaka; Yoichi Koike; Hirotaka Sano; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Anatomy of the anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Dugas; Roger V Ostrander; E Lyle Cain; David Kingsley; James R Andrews
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Biomechanics of the elbow during baseball pitching.

Authors:  S L Werner; G S Fleisig; C J Dillman; J R Andrews
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Preoperative evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography. Evaluation in 25 baseball players with surgical confirmation.

Authors:  L A Timmerman; M L Schwartz; J R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  MR arthrography of elbow: evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of elbow.

Authors:  K Nakanishi; T Masatomi; T Ochi; T Ishida; S Hori; J Ikezoe; H Nakamura
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Dynamic US of the anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow in asymptomatic major league baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Levon N Nazarian; John M McShane; Michael G Ciccotti; Patrick L O'Kane; Marc I Harwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Sonography of injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow-initial experience.

Authors:  Theodore T Miller; Ronald S Adler; Lawrence Friedman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  6 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow in healthy volunteers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nakul Gupta; John S Labis; Joshua Harris; Michael A Trakhtenbroit; Leif E Peterson; Robert A Jack; Patrick C McCulloch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  State of the Union on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in 2020: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Joseph D Lamplot; Joshua I Wright-Chisem; Evan W James; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

3.  Ultrasonography: an interesting imaging method for ligament assessment during the acute phase of closed elbow injuries.

Authors:  Romain Bilger; Pierre Laumonerie; Hugo Barret; Franck Lapègue; Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Sans; Marie Faruch-Bilfeld
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Elbow Torque May be Predictive of Anatomic Adaptations to the Elbow After a Season of Collegiate Pitching: A Dynamic Ultrasound Study.

Authors:  Lafi S Khalil; Toufic R Jildeh; Muhammad J Abbas; Chad L Klochko; Courtney Scher; Marnix Van Holsbeeck; Stephanie J Muh; Eric C Makhni; Vasilios Moutzouros; Kelechi R Okoroha
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-09

5.  Professional Pitchers Display Differences in UCL Morphology and Elbow Gapping During Moving Valgus Stress Testing After UCL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Kissenberth; Charles A Thigpen; Lane Brooks Bailey; Joel Campbell; Derik J Geist; Mark L Schweppe; Douglas J Wyland; Richard J Hawkins; Thomas J Noonan; Ellen Shanley
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Do anatomic changes found in the throwing arm after a season of pitching resolve with off-season rest? A dynamic ultrasound study.

Authors:  Lafi S Khalil; Kelechi R Okoroha; Toufic R Jildeh; Robert N Matar; Mohsin S Fidai; Joseph S Tramer; Chase Ansok; Courtney Scher; Marnix Van Holsbeeck; Eric C Makhni; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-10-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.