Cort D Lawton1, Joseph D Lamplot2, Joshua I Wright-Chisem2, Evan W James2, Christopher L Camp3, Joshua S Dines2. 1. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. cort.lawton125@gmail.com. 2. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 3. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a marked increase in the number of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions performed annually and an associated increase in the amount of recent literature published. It is paramount that surgeons remain up to date on the current literature, as modern indications and surgical techniques continue to improve clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Our understanding of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries, treatment indications, and surgical techniques for UCL reconstruction continues to evolve. Despite the rapidly increasing amount of published literature on the topic, a clear and concise surgical algorithm is lacking. Studies have suggested a trend towards improved clinical outcomes and decreased complications with various modifications in UCL reconstruction techniques. Current sport-specific outcome studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effect of UCL reconstruction on an athlete's performance upon returning to sport. With the rising incidence of UCL reconstruction and growing media attention, UCL injuries, reconstruction techniques, and return to sport following UCL surgery are timely topics of interest to clinicians and overhead throwing athletes. Several technique modifications have been reported, and these modifications may lead to improved outcomes and lower complication rates. Studies assessing sport-specific outcome measures will be necessary to provide a more critical and informative analysis of outcomes following UCL reconstruction.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a marked increase in the number of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions performed annually and an associated increase in the amount of recent literature published. It is paramount that surgeons remain up to date on the current literature, as modern indications and surgical techniques continue to improve clinical outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Our understanding of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries, treatment indications, and surgical techniques for UCL reconstruction continues to evolve. Despite the rapidly increasing amount of published literature on the topic, a clear and concise surgical algorithm is lacking. Studies have suggested a trend towards improved clinical outcomes and decreased complications with various modifications in UCL reconstruction techniques. Current sport-specific outcome studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effect of UCL reconstruction on an athlete's performance upon returning to sport. With the rising incidence of UCL reconstruction and growing media attention, UCL injuries, reconstruction techniques, and return to sport following UCL surgery are timely topics of interest to clinicians and overhead throwing athletes. Several technique modifications have been reported, and these modifications may lead to improved outcomes and lower complication rates. Studies assessing sport-specific outcome measures will be necessary to provide a more critical and informative analysis of outcomes following UCL reconstruction.
Authors: S Pomianowski; S W O'Driscoll; P G Neale; M J Park; B F Morrey; K N An Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Joel T Rohrbough; David W Altchek; Jon Hyman; Riley J Williams; Jonathan D Botts Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Salvatore J Frangiamore; T Sean Lynch; Michael D Vaughn; Lonnie Soloff; Michael Forney; Joseph F Styron; Mark S Schickendantz Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Daryl C Osbahr; E Lyle Cain; B Todd Raines; Dave Fortenbaugh; Jeffrey R Dugas; James R Andrews Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Brandon J Erickson; Michael Fu; Kate Meyers; Christopher L Camp; David W Altchek; Struan H Coleman; Joshua S Dines Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-02-11