| Literature DB >> 28424755 |
Sanjiv Sharma1, Anwer Saeed2, Christopher Johnson1, Nikolaj Gadegaard2, Anthony Eg Cass1.
Abstract
The next generation of devices for personal healthcare monitoring will comprise molecular sensors to monitor analytes of interest in the skin compartment. Transdermal devices based on microneedles offer an excellent opportunity to explore the dynamics of molecular markers in the interstitial fluid, however good acceptability of these next generation devices will require several technical problems associated with current commercially available wearable sensors to be overcome. These particularly include reliability, comfort and cost. An essential pre-requisite for transdermal molecular sensing devices is that they can be fabricated using scalable technologies which are cost effective. We present here a minimally invasive microneedle array as a continuous monitoring platform technology. Method for scalable fabrication of these structures is presented. The microneedle arrays were characterised mechanically and were shown to penetrate human skin under moderate thumb pressure. They were then functionalised and evaluated as glucose, lactate and theophylline biosensors. The results suggest that this technology can be employed in the measurement of metabolites, therapeutic drugs and biomarkers and could have an important role to play in the management of chronic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); Continuous lactate monitoring (CLM); Interstitial therapeutic drug monitoring (iTDM); Microneedles; Minimally invasive sensors
Year: 2017 PMID: 28424755 PMCID: PMC5384990 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbsr.2016.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sens Biosensing Res ISSN: 2214-1804
Fig. 1Dose-response curves obtained for glucose, lactate and theophylline. Panel (a) is a dose-response curve obtained from three working electrodes functionalised with glucose oxidase entrapped in polyphenol but without an epoxy PU membrane. In panels (b) and (c) the red curves are for working electrodes coated with epoxy PU membrane and the black curves are for working electrodes without the membrane.
Showing the Michaelis-Menten KM constant and the maximum limiting current Imax for the three biosensors.
| Biosensor | Enzyme | Km | Imax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theophylline biosensor | Xanthine oxidase (7 U/mg) | ||
| With epoxy PU membrane | 31 μM ± 1.22 | 0.52 μA ± 0.05 | |
| Without membrane | 13 μM ± 1.84 | 0.31 μA ± 0.008 | |
| Lactate biosensor | Lactate oxidase (41 U/mg) | ||
| With epoxy PU membrane | 3.03 mM ± 0.9 | 2.5 μA ± 0.2 | |
| Without membrane | 0.7 mM ± 0.08 | 0.95 μA ± 0.06 | |
| Glucose biosensor | Glucose oxidase (239 U/mg) | ||
| WE1 no membrane | 11.4 mM ± 2.74 | 20.3 μA ± 2.45 | |
| WE2 no membrane | 13.9 mM ± 5.9 | 23.6 μA ± 5.4 | |
| WE3 no membrane | 15.5 mM ± 9.6 | 25.5 μA ± 8.71 |
Fig. 2(a) Showing image of the polycarbonate microneedle array sputtered with 50 nm platinum. (b) & (c) Scanning electrochemical microscope images of the microneedle at 100 × and 500 × magnification. (d) Optical coherence tomographic image showing the section of tissue with one embedded microneedle as seen here the microneedle penetrates 800 μm deep into the skin. (e) Graphics produced in ImageJ using the 3D Viewer plugin showing a row of the microneedles embedded in the tissue.