Literature DB >> 24085235

Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.

Antonio Vitarelli1, Lucia Divenuto, Francesca Fortunato, Antonio Falco, Vincenzo Pagliarulo, Gabriele Antonini, Vincenzo Gentile, Alessandro Sciarra, Stefano Salciccia, Salvatore Sansalone, Maria Rosaria Di Placido, Giulio Garaffa, Arcangelo Pagliarulo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Penile prosthesis implantation is the solution of choice in patients who have failed or present contraindication to the use of all conservative treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). Overall, satisfaction rates are high, with more than 80% of patients and partners fully satisfied with cosmetic and functional result of surgery. Chronic postoperative pain, penile shortening, soft or hyposensitive glans, pencil like penis syndrome and difficulty to cycle the device represent the most common causes of patient's dissatisfaction. Satisfaction rates are better assessed with the use of validated questionnaires such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) The aim of our study was to analyze the long-term mechanical reliability of the AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis and the patient's satisfaction rate using IIEF and EDITS questionnaire as standard reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case notes review of all patients who have undergone implantation of a three pieces inflatable penile prosthesis AMS 700 CX and CXR between October 1997 and December 2010. Overall, 80 patients have undergone implantation of 3 pieces inflatable penile prosthesis AMS 700 CX InhibiZone. Patients have been administered the IIEF-5 and EDITS questionnaires in combination with a non validated 9 domain questionnaire that assesses penile rigidity, sensation, orgasmic function, frequency of intercourse, impact of surgery on the quality of life, satisfaction rate.
RESULTS: Overall 10 years survival estimate according to the Kaplan Meier method of AMS 700 CX touch pump and AMS 700 CX momentary squeeze pump are respectively 77.6% and 82.5%. The median postoperative IIEF5 and EDITS score were respectively 21.46 and 73.11, which show a high level of satisfaction. 59 patients (90.8%) were able to cycle the device and were engaging in penetrative sexual intercourse.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile prosthesis implantation yields excellent results in terms of cosmetic and functional outcome and therefore has a significant impact on patients' satisfaction, sex life and overall quality of life. Overall, long term reliability has been significantly improved and complication rates are low in the hands of experienced surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085235     DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl        ISSN: 1124-3562


  13 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.

Authors:  F Akdemir; E Okulu; Ö Kayıgil
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models.

Authors:  A R Casabé; N Sarotto; C Gutierrez; A J Bechara
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  [Sphincter and corpus cavernosum prostheses as components of endoprosthetics in urology].

Authors:  T A Ludwig; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Yoon Seob Ji; Young Hwii Ko; Phil Hyun Song; Ki Hak Moon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-02

6.  [Quality of life in patients who suffered erectile dysfunction and underwent penile implant surgery in terms of sexual satisfaction of the patient and partner].

Authors:  K-M Arndt; A Chomicz; K-P Jünemann; D Osmonov
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

8.  The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10-Year Period, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Ahmed A Hussein; Thomas H Sanford; Charles E McCulloch; Alan W Shindel; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.491

9.  Utilization of penile prosthesis and male incontinence prosthetics in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Ahmad J Al-Sayyad
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Jose A Saavedra-Belaunde; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.