Literature DB >> 28424345

Floaters may buffer the extinction risk of small populations: an empirical assessment.

Hugo Robles1,2, Carlos Ciudad3,4.   

Abstract

The high extinction risk of small populations is commonly explained by reductions in fecundity and breeder survival associated with demographic and environmental stochasticity. However, ecological theory suggests that population extinctions may also arise from reductions in the number of floaters able to replace the lost breeders. This can be particularly plausible under harsh fragmentation scenarios, where species must survive as small populations subjected to severe effects of stochasticity. Using a woodpecker study in fragmented habitats (2004-2016), we provide here empirical support for the largely neglected hypothesis that floaters buffer population extirpation risks. After controlling for population size, patch size and the intrinsic quality of habitat, populations in patches with floaters had a lower extinction probability than populations in patches without floaters (0.013 versus 0.131). Floaters, which often replace the lost breeders, were less likely to occur in small and low-quality patches, showing that population extirpations may arise from unnoticed reductions in floater numbers in poor-quality habitats. We argue that adequate pools of the typically overlooked floaters may buffer extirpation risks by reducing the detrimental impacts of demographic and environmental stochasticity. However, unravelling the influence of floaters in buffering stochastic effects and promoting population stability require additional studies in an ample array of species and stochastic scenarios.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  buffer effect; demographic and environmental stochasticity; habitat degradation; habitat loss and fragmentation; non-breeding; population extirpation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424345      PMCID: PMC5413921          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  10 in total

1.  Avian persistence in fragmented rainforest.

Authors:  Luc Lens; Stefan Van Dongen; Ken Norris; Mwangi Githiru; Erik Matthysen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Model selection in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jerald B Johnson; Kristian S Omland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Floater dynamics can explain positive patterns of density-dependent fecundity in animal populations.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Fermín Otalora; Miguel Ferrer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Optimal floating and queuing strategies: consequences for density dependence and habitat loss.

Authors:  H Kokko; W J Sutherland
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Influence of habitat quality, population size, patch size, and connectivity on patch-occupancy dynamics of the middle spotted woodpecker.

Authors:  Hugo Robles; Carlos Ciudad
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Modelling effects of nonbreeders on population growth estimates.

Authors:  Aline M Lee; Jane M Reid; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993 Dec.       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Population models for social species: lessons learned from models of Red‐cockaded Woodpeckers (Picoides borealis).

Authors:  Sara L Zeigler; Jeffrey R Walters
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Times to extinction for small populations of large birds.

Authors:  S L Pimm; J Diamond; T M Reed; G J Russell; J Verner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Floaters may buffer the extinction risk of small populations: an empirical assessment.

Authors:  Hugo Robles; Carlos Ciudad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.530

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Floaters may buffer the extinction risk of small populations: an empirical assessment.

Authors:  Hugo Robles; Carlos Ciudad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Diverse grouping and mating strategies in the Critically Endangered Hainan gibbon (Nomascus hainanus).

Authors:  Kun Jin; Jiang Zhou; Ping Li; Paul A Garber; Yu Bi; Xuming Qi
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.