Literature DB >> 27625075

Modelling effects of nonbreeders on population growth estimates.

Aline M Lee1,2, Jane M Reid2, Steven R Beissinger1,3.   

Abstract

Adult individuals that do not breed in a given year occur in a wide range of natural populations. However, such nonbreeders are often ignored in theoretical and empirical population studies, limiting our knowledge of how nonbreeders affect realized and estimated population dynamics and potentially impeding projection of deterministic and stochastic population growth rates. We present and analyse a general modelling framework for systems where breeders and nonbreeders differ in key demographic rates, incorporating different forms of nonbreeding, different life histories and frequency-dependent effects of nonbreeders on demographic rates of breeders. Comparisons of estimates of deterministic population growth rate, λ, and demographic variance, σd2, from models with and without distinct nonbreeder classes show that models that do not explicitly incorporate nonbreeders give upwardly biased estimates of σd2, particularly when the equilibrium ratio of nonbreeders to breeders, Nnb∗/Nb∗, is high. Estimates of λ from empirical observations of breeders only are substantially inflated when individuals frequently re-enter the breeding population after periods of nonbreeding. Sensitivity analyses of diverse parameterizations of our model framework, with and without negative frequency-dependent effects of nonbreeders on breeder demographic rates, show how changes in demographic rates of breeders vs. nonbreeders differentially affect λ. In particular, λ is most sensitive to nonbreeder parameters in long-lived species, when Nnb∗/Nb∗>0, and when individuals are unlikely to breed at several consecutive time steps. Our results demonstrate that failing to account for nonbreeders in population studies can obscure low population growth rates that should cause management concern. Quantifying the size and demography of the nonbreeding section of populations and modelling appropriate demographic structuring is therefore essential to evaluate nonbreeders' influence on deterministic and stochastic population dynamics.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society.

Keywords:  demographic stochasticity; floaters; intermittent breeding; matrix model; nonbreeding; population dynamics; reproductive skipping; sensitivity analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27625075     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

Review 1.  Estimating adult sex ratios in nature.

Authors:  Sergio Ancona; Francisco V Dénes; Oliver Krüger; Tamás Székely; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mitigating impacts of invasive alien predators on an endangered sea duck amidst high native predation pressure.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Ida Hermansson; Bertille Mohring; Benjamin B Steele; Markus Öst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Oversummering juvenile and adult Semipalmated sandpipers in Perú gain enough survival to compensate for foregone breeding opportunity.

Authors:  Eveling A Tavera; Glenn E Stauffer; David B Lank; Ronald C Ydenberg
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Among-individual and within-individual variation in seasonal migration covaries with subsequent reproductive success in a partially migratory bird.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Moray Souter; Sarah R Fenn; Paul Acker; Ana Payo-Payo; Sarah J Burthe; Sarah Wanless; Francis Daunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Floaters may buffer the extinction risk of small populations: an empirical assessment.

Authors:  Hugo Robles; Carlos Ciudad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Management of a Dutch resident barnacle goose Branta leucopsis population: How can results from counts, ringing and hunting bag statistics be reconciled?

Authors:  Henk P van der Jeugd; Anne Kwak
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Can attraction to and competition for high-quality habitats shape breeding propensity?

Authors:  Paul Acker; Michael Schaub; Aurélien Besnard; Jean-Yves Monnat; Emmanuelle Cam
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Intercolony variation in reproductive skipping in the African penguin.

Authors:  Freddie W Leith; Jennifer L Grigg; Barbara J Barham; Peter J Barham; Katrin Ludynia; Cuan McGeorge; Andile Mdluli; Nola J Parsons; Lauren J Waller; Richard B Sherley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.