Literature DB >> 28423658

Correlation between polymorphisms in microRNA-regulated genes and cervical cancer susceptibility in a Xinjiang Uygur population.

Jing Fang1, Ying Li2, Jiayi Zhang3,4, Mengdan Yan3,4, Jingjie Li3,4, Shan Bao5, Tianbo Jin3,4.   

Abstract

We explored the correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and susceptibility to cervical cancer (CC) in a Xinjiang Uygur population. Ten SNPs in eight miRNA-regulated genes were selected for analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect correlations between SNPs and CC. We found that minor allele "C" of rs512715 in NEAT1 was associated with an increased risk of CC in the allele, codominant, dominant, overdominant and log-additive models. Minor allele "C" of rs4777498 in CELF6 was associated with an increased risk of CC in the recessive model. Minor allele "C" of rs3094 in RNASE4 was associated with increased risk of CC in the allele, dominant and log-additive models. In clinical stage III/IV CC patients, minor allele "C" of rs3094 in RNASE4 and minor allele "C" of rs8004334 in JDP2 were associated with increased risk. In subtype squamous carcinoma CC patients, minor allele "C" of rs512715 in NEAT1 and minor allele "C" of rs3094 in RNASE4 were associated with increased risk. In subtype adenocarcinoma CC patients, minor allele "C" of rs3094 in RNASE was associated with increased risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MicroRNA gene; association study; cervical cancer; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28423658      PMCID: PMC5458245          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women, with 528,000 occurrences and 266,000 deaths in 2012 [1]. More than 85% of CC occurs in developing regions such as Eastern Africa, Melanesia, and Southern and Central Africa, where cervical CC accounts for more than 60% of gynecological cancers [2]. Cervical cancer is mainly attributable to human papillomaviruses (HPVs or PVs), which belong to the large Papillomaviridae family [1]. HPV particles include an approximately 8000-bp, double-stranded, closed circular DNA harboring eight genes [3]. Although previous studies have reported several biomarkers of CC, including p16INK4a and Ki-67, few have investigated the relationship between CC risk and microRNA (miRNA)-regulated genes, including CDK6, PTEN and NEAT1, among others. MiRNAs are small (~19-25 nucleotides) non-coding RNA sequences that regulate gene expression through translational suppression accomplished through direct and/or triggered degradation of coding mRNAs mediated through binding to complementary sequences in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) [4]. In this way, miRNAs play key roles in a variety of biological process, including cell apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, development and tumorigenesis, which are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of ailments, including cancer, nephropathy and renovascular disease [5-7]. Consequently, how miRNA-regulated genes affect CC risk would seem to be a potentially meaningful investigation. We therefore investigated the relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in miRNA-regulated genes and the risk of CC. In the present case-control study, we selected 10 SNPs in eight miRNA-regulated genes and performed a comprehensive association analysis in a Xinjiang Uygur population.

RESULTS

The basic information on the 10 SNPs examined in this study is summarized in Table 1. We found that rs2285332 (p = 0.008), rs11202607 (p = 0.022) and rs680413 (p = 0.013) deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (p < 0.05), and were excluded from our analysis. We found two SNPs were significantly associated with CC (rs512715, NEAT1, OR = 1.354, 95% CI: 1.039-1.764, p = 0.025; rs3094, RNASE4, OR = 1.359, 95% CI: 1.051-1.758, p = 0.019).
Table 1

Basic information on the SNPs examined in this study

SNPsMiRNAGeneChrBandRoleAllelesMAFHWEpOR95% CIp
casaecontrol
rs2285332hsa-miR-218CDK6chr77q21.23′ UTRC/G0.5040.4370.0081.3101.0291.6690.028
rs701848hsa-miR-23bPTENchr1010q23.313′ UTRT/C0.5360.4890.1921.2070.9481.5360.126
rs11202607hsa-miR-23bPTENchr1010q23.313′ UTRT/C0.0790.0650.0221.2350.7741.9690.375
rs680413hsa-mir-342-3pNEAT1chr1111q13.15′ UTRG/T0.1300.1280.0131.0130.7071.4520.943
rs512715hsa-mir-342-3pNEAT1chr1111q13.15′ UTRC/G0.3260.2630.2211.3541.0391.7640.025
rs1133822hsa-mir-342-3pLOC105372481chr1919q13.43-G/A0.3020.3281.0000.8850.6821.1470.355
rs4777498hsa-mir-375CELF6chr1515q233′ UTRC/A0.2020.1840.6931.1240.8291.5250.452
rs3094hsa-mir-590-5pRNASE4chr1414q11.23′ UTRC/T0.3600.2930.4761.3591.0511.7580.019
rs8004334hsa-mir-590-5pJDP2chr1414q24.3PromoterC/T0.4350.3790.6151.2630.9881.6140.062
rs3733839hsa-mir-590-5pLOC153684chr55p125′ UTRC/G0.2650.2730.2930.9610.7321.2620.774

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; MiRNA: microRNA; Chr: chromosome; MAF: Minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; MiRNA: microRNA; Chr: chromosome; MAF: Minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval. p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. We then conducted an unconditional logistic regression analysis, and the positive results are illustrated in Table 2. We found three SNPs that were associated with increased CC risk in different models. The minor allele “C” of rs512715 increased CC risk in the codominant (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.09-2.24, p = 0.044), dominant (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.10-2.18, p = 0.012), overdominant (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03-2.08, p = 0.032) and log-additive (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.75, p = 0.027) models. The minor allele “C” of rs4777498 increased CC risk in the recessive model (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.01-5.70, p = 0.041). And the minor allele “C” of rs3094 increased CC risk in dominant (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.08, p = 0.027) and log-additive (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.04-1.74, p = 0.021) models.
Table 2

Unconditional logistic regression analysis of the association between SNPs and CC risk

SNPsModelGenotypeControls n (%)Cases n (%)OR (95% CI)pAICBIC
rs512715CodominantG/G159 (55.8%)111 (44.9%)10.044734.5747.4
C/G102 (35.8%)111 (44.9%)1.56 (1.09-2.24)
C/C24 (8.4%)25 (10.1%)1.49 (0.81-2.75)
DominantG/G159 (55.8%)111 (44.9%)10.012732.5741.1
C/G-C/C126 (44.2%)136 (55.1%)1.55 (1.10-2.18)
RecessiveG/G-C/G261 (91.6%)222 (89.9%)10.5738.3746.9
C/C24 (8.4%)25 (10.1%)1.22 (0.68-2.20)
OverdominantG/G-C/C183 (64.2%)136 (55.1%)10.032734.2742.7
C/G102 (35.8%)111 (44.9%)1.46 (1.03-2.08)
Log-additive---------1.34 (1.03-1.75)0.027733.9742.5
rs4777498CodominantA/A188 (66%)163 (66%)10.1736.2749
C/A89 (31.2%)68 (27.5%)0.88 (0.60-1.29)
C/C8 (2.8%)16 (6.5%)2.31 (0.96-5.53)
DominantA/A188 (66%)163 (66%)10.99738.8747.3
C/A-C/C97 (34%)84 (34%)1.00 (0.70-1.43)
RecessiveA/A-C/A277 (97.2%)231 (93.5%)10.041734.6743.2
C/C8 (2.8%)16 (6.5%)2.40 (1.01-5.70)
OverdominantA/A-C/C196 (68.8%)179 (72.5%)10.35737.9746.5
C/A89 (31.2%)68 (27.5%)0.84 (0.57-1.22)
Log-additive---------1.12 (0.83-1.51)0.46738.3746.8
rs3094CodominantT/T145 (50.9%)102 (41.3%)10.067735.4748.2
T/C113 (39.6%)112 (45.3%)1.41 (0.98-2.03)
C/C27 (9.5%)33 (13.4%)1.74 (0.98-3.07)
DominantT/T145 (50.9%)102 (41.3%)10.027733.9742.5
T/C-C/C140 (49.1%)145 (58.7%)1.47 (1.04-2.08)
RecessiveT/T-T/C258 (90.5%)214 (86.6%)10.16736.8745.4
C/C27 (9.5%)33 (13.4%)1.47 (0.86-2.53)
OverdominantT/T-C/C172 (60.4%)135 (54.7%)10.18737745.6
T/C113 (39.6%)112 (45.3%)1.26 (0.89-1.78)
Log-additive---------1.35 (1.04-1.74)0.021733.5742

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval. p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The associations between SNPs and different clinical stages and CC subtypes were assessed, and the positive results are illustrated in Table 3. In clinical stage III/IV patients, we found rs3094 (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.06-2.14, p = 0.021) and rs8004334 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.15-2.24, p = 0.006) to be associated with an increased CC risk. In subtype squamous carcinoma patients, we found rs512715 (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.79, p = 0.021) and rs3094 (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70, p = 0.043) to be associated with an increased CC risk. And in subtype adenocarcinoma patients, we found rs3094 (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.11-11.24, p = 0.004) to be associated with an increased CC risk.
Table 3

Association between SNPs and different clinical CC subtypes

SNPsClinical StagesSubtypes
I-IIIII-IVsquamous carcinomaadenocarcinoma
OR (95%CI)pOR (95%CI)pOR (95%CI)pOR (95%CI)p
rs5127151.23 (0.90-1.68)0.1871.41 (0.98-2.02)0.0601.37(1.05-1.79)0.0210.93 (0.30-2.94)0.906
rs30941.26 (0.93-1.70)0.1361.51 (1.06-2.14)0.0211.31(1.01-1.70)0.0434.02 (1.44-11.24)0.004
rs80043341.07 (0.81-1.43)0.6241.60 (1.15-2.24)0.0061.27(0.99-1.63)0.0560.98 (0.35-2.74)0.974

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations: SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval. p-values were calculated using Pearson's χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we found that four SNPs belonging to four miRNA-regulated genes were associated with CC risk. These were rs512715 in NEAT1 regulated by hsa-mir-342-3p, rs4777498 in CELF6 regulated by hsa-mir-375, and rs3094 in RNASE4 and rs8004334 in JDP2, both regulated by hsa-mir-590-5p. In humans, miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II in the nucleus as pri-miRNAs, which may contain two or more mature miRNAs. Subsequently, pri-miRNAs are processed by RNase III to form pre-miRNAs exported to the cytosol, carried by exportin 5, after which the pre-miRNAs are processed by Dicer in the cytosol to mature miRNAs. One strand of the mature miRNA is then incorporated with RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), directing it to target mRNA [8]. The minor allele “C” of rs512715 increased CC risk in the allele, codominant, dominant, overdominant and log-additive models. Rs512715 belongs to NEAT1, which is regulated by hsa-mir-342-3p. We know of no other study relating NEAT1 to CC risk, though a Chinese study found a relationship between NEAT1 and bladder cancer [9, 10]. In addition, an American study found hsa-mir-342-3p to be related to irritable bowel syndrome [11]. In a German study, significant upregulation of hsa-miR-342-3p was detected in the brains of macaques infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and in a pilot study they also showed that hsa-miR-342-3p was upregulated in brain samples from humans with type 1 or type 2 sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [12]. We have so far detected no direct evidence of a specific relationship between hsa-miR-342-3p and CC, and we suggest that this miRNA likely plays a general role in the regulation of multiple target genes in disease. However, the detailed mechanism by which hsa-miR-342-3p exerts gene effects in CC deserves further investigation. The minor allele “C” of rs4777498 increased CC risk in the recessive model. Rs4777498 belongs to CELF6, which is regulated by hsa-mir-375. An American study found that CELF6 is highly expressed in diencephalic nuclei and neuromodulatory cell populations of the mouse brain [13]. Previous studies also reported hsa-mir-375 to be related to pancreatic cancer and early stage breast cancer [14, 15]. In breast cancer, higher levels of hsa-mir-375 were expressed in ER-α-positive than ER-α-negative or normal cells, which led to the suggestion that hsa-miR-375 up-regulation is a key driver of cell proliferation and an early event in tumorigenesis in ER-α-positive tissues [16]. However, a detailed understanding of the mechanism by which hsa-mir-375 affects CC risks will require further investigation. The minor allele “C” of rs3094 increased CC risk in the allele, dominant and log-additive models. In clinical stage III/IV patients, the minor allele “C” of rs3094 and minor allele “C” of rs8004334 were associated with increased CC risk. Rs3094 belongs to RNASE4 while rs8004334 belong to JDP2, and both are regulated by hsa-mir-590-5p. Previous studies showed RNASE4 to be associated with high-altitude adaptation, metabolic syndrome and neuron degeneration [17-19], while JDP2 was associated with heart failure [20]. Hsa-mir-590-5p is reportedly related to cardiac differentiation through down-regulation of TGFB signaling [21]. TGFB1-induced activation of Smad 2, -3, -4 leads to direct inhibition of STAT5 transactivation and STAT5-mediated transcription of downstream target genes, including miR-590 [22]. TGFB1 inhibits STAT5 expression at the protein level with no effect on mRNA expression. Whether there is a relationship between the mechanism of hsa-mir-590-5p-mediated effects on CC risk and TGFB signaling warrants further investigation. There are two intrinsic limitations to this study. 1) The sample size was not large enough to obtain illative combinatory associations between SNPs and CC. 2) Selection bias may be unavoidable since this was a hospital-based study. Therefore, larger well-designed studies combined with CC classification are needed to confirm the observed associations and clarify the potential biological mechanisms of these SNPs in CC. In summary, we have identified significant associations between rs512715 (NEAT1), rs4777498 (CELF6), rs3094 (RNASE) and rs8004334 (JDP2) and CC risk in Xinjiang Uygur population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study participants

A total of 532 subjects, including 247 patients with cervical cancer and 285 healthy women were recruited at the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region between January 2014 and Jun 2016. The included patients were recently diagnosed with primary CC based on cervical biopsy with histopathological confirmation. We excluded patients with other cancers who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Controls were healthy, unrelated individuals selected randomly from the medical examination center of the hospital. All participants were women at least 18 years old in good mental condition who had at least three generations of paternal ancestry in their ethnicity (Xinjiang Uygur population). Tumors were staged according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocols were approved by the institutional review board of the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.

SNP selection and genotyping

Candidate SNPs were selected from among previously published polymorphisms associated with CC. Validated SNPs were selected with a MAF > 5% in the HapMap Asian population [23]. Venous blood samples (5 ml) were collected from each patient during laboratory examination. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using a Gold Mag-Mini Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (version 3.0; TaKaRa, Japan) [24] and stored at -80°C after centrifugation. DNA concentrations were evaluated using spectrometry (DU530 UV/VIS spectrophotometer, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). We used Sequenom MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 Software to design the Multiplexed SNP MassEXTEND assays [25]. SNP genotyping was done with a Sequenom MassARRAY RS1000 using the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer [25]. The primer sequences used for genotyping are listed in Table 4. Data management and analyses were performed using Sequenom Typer 4.0 software as previously described [25, 26].
Table 4

Primers used for this study

SNP_ID1st-PCRP2nd-PCRPUEP_SEQ
rs2285332ACGTTGGATGTGAGCTGC TTCAGTGTAACCACGTTGGATGCTTTG CCAAAAGCTAAGCAGgGCCAAAAGCTAAGCAGTGGTGAA
rs701848ACGTTGGATGATAGTGCTC CCCCGAGTTGACGTTGGATGCTCCG CTTAAAATCGTATGCTGATTTTTTTTAAGAAGTGAAATTGA
rs11202607ACGTTGGATGTATTTATG ACCTGGCCCTCCACGTTGGATGTTACAA TTTCGGGCACCGCAcTTCGGGCACCGCATATTAAAA
rs680413ACGTTGGATGCCTAGA CCTAGTCTCCTTGCACGTTGGATGGGGAG AGATGACTGAGTTAGggTGACTGAGTTAGATGAGAC
rs512715ACGTTGGATGAACAG CCACTCGGCTTACTGACGTTGGATGCCCTT CTTCCTCCCTTTAACAACTTATCCATTCACTTAAAACATTA
rs1133822ACGTTGGATGCCTTC GTTCTCCTTCGTTTGACGTTGGATGTTTC TCTGCTCTGGCAGACCgGGGCACCACTTGTCACGG
rs4777498ACGTTGGATGGGATTG TGGATTGTGGGTTCACGTTGGATGTGAG GTCTAGGCTCACATGCGCTCACATGCAGGTAAT
rs3094ACGTTGGATGGATTATC GCGAGTGGTTGACACGTTGGATGAATGAG CTGAGGAGACAGAGccGCTGAGGAGACAGAGCCTGGG
rs8004334ACGTTGGATGACTAAA GGCCTCCCAAGTCAACGTTGGATGTCCTA CTGGGCCTTTGCTTCaTTTGCTTCCCCCACAAATTAAAT
rs3733839ACGTTGGATGCCATGC AACCAATTCCATCCACGTTGGATGGTCTCC TGACTTGTCAAGGCTCCTCTGCACCTGTCCT

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA, USA) and the SPSS 17.0 statistical package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All p values in this study were two-sided, and p ≤ 0.05 after Bonferroni correction was considered the statistical significance threshold [27]. An exact test was used to assess the departure of each SNP frequency from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the controls. We compared allele frequencies between cases and controls using the χ2 test. To assess the association of single SNPs with the risk of CC, five genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive, over-dominant and log-additive) were applied using PLINK software (http://www.cog-genomics.org/plink2/). Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p values were calculated using unconditional logistic regression analysis [28-30].
  29 in total

Review 1.  Statistics notes. The odds ratio.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

2.  MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization.

Authors:  Yoontae Lee; Kipyoung Jeon; Jun-Tae Lee; Sunyoung Kim; V Narry Kim
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-02       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  [EXAMPLE OF THE USE OF THE NONPARAMETRIC TEST. TEST X2 FOR COMPARISON OF 2 INDEPENDENT EXAMPLES].

Authors:  C ADAMEC
Journal:  Cesk Zdrav       Date:  1964-12

4.  Genomic analysis of snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus) identifies genes and processes related to high-altitude adaptation.

Authors:  Li Yu; Guo-Dong Wang; Jue Ruan; Yong-Bin Chen; Cui-Ping Yang; Xue Cao; Hong Wu; Yan-Hu Liu; Zheng-Lin Du; Xiao-Ping Wang; Jing Yang; Shao-Chen Cheng; Li Zhong; Lu Wang; Xuan Wang; Jing-Yang Hu; Lu Fang; Bing Bai; Kai-Le Wang; Na Yuan; Shi-Fang Wu; Bao-Guo Li; Jin-Guo Zhang; Ye-Qin Yang; Cheng-Lin Zhang; Yong-Cheng Long; Hai-Shu Li; Jing-Yuan Yang; David M Irwin; Oliver A Ryder; Ying Li; Chung-I Wu; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  SNP genotyping using Sequenom MassARRAY 7K platform.

Authors:  Stacey Gabriel; Liuda Ziaugra
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2004-09

6.  Postoperative prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer with seven microRNAs.

Authors:  Kwang Hyuck Lee; Jong Kyun Lee; Dong Wook Choi; In-Gu Do; Insuk Sohn; Kee-Taek Jang; Sin-Ho Jung; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Kyu Taek Lee
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Proteomics approaches in cervical cancer: focus on the discovery of biomarkers for diagnosis and drug treatment monitoring.

Authors:  Georgia Kontostathi; Jerome Zoidakis; Nicholas P Anagnou; Kalliopi I Pappa; Antonia Vlahou; Manousos Makridakis
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.940

8.  The RNA-binding protein Celf6 is highly expressed in diencephalic nuclei and neuromodulatory cell populations of the mouse brain.

Authors:  Susan E Maloney; Eakta Khangura; Joseph D Dougherty
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Identification of Specific miRNA Signature in Paired Sera and Tissue Samples of Indian Women with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seema Thakur; Rajesh K Grover; Sanjay Gupta; Ajay K Yadav; Bhudev C Das
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Variant of SNPs at lncRNA NEAT1 contributes to gastric cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Xuanke Ji; Yali Yan; Nan Ma; Gui He; Kunyan Wang; Yuehua Zhang; Jingjing Yin; Chunhua Song; Peng Wang; Hua Ye; Liping Dai; Jianying Zhang; Kaijuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A risk score model for the prediction of osteosarcoma metastasis.

Authors:  Siqi Dong; Hongjun Huo; Yu Mao; Xin Li; Lixin Dong
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.693

3.  Association study between the polymorphisms of angiogenesis-related genes and cervical cancer susceptibility in Chinese Uygur population.

Authors:  Lili Han; Sulaiya Husaiyin; Chunhua Ma; Mayinuer Niyazi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Association between NEAT1 polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongbao Hu; Jingsheng Chen; Ping Meng; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  The Association between Five Genetic Variants in MicroRNAs (rs2910164, rs11614913, rs3746444, rs11134527, and rs531564) and Cervical Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Peng Dong; Liane Zhou; Shijun Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  CELF Family Proteins in Cancer: Highlights on the RNA-Binding Protein/Noncoding RNA Regulatory Axis.

Authors:  Maryam Nasiri-Aghdam; Texali C Garcia-Garduño; Luis Felipe Jave-Suárez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  RNA-binding protein CELF6 modulates transcription and splicing levels of genes associated with tumorigenesis in lung cancer A549 cells.

Authors:  HuSai Ma; GuoWei Liu; Bin Yu; Joshua Wang; YaLi Qi; YiYing Kou; Ying Hu; ShunJun Wang; Fei Wang; Dong Chen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.061

8.  The association between polymorphisms in microRNA genes and cervical cancer in a Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Li Chuanyin; Wang Xiaona; Yan Zhiling; Zhang Yu; Liu Shuyuan; Yang Jie; Hong Chao; Shi Li; Yang Hongying; Yao Yufeng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-23

Review 9.  Pan-cancer analysis of long non-coding RNA NEAT1 in various cancers.

Authors:  Shufen Li; Jingming Li; Chen Chen; Rongsheng Zhang; Kankan Wang
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2017-11-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.