| Literature DB >> 28423632 |
Xiang Li1, Ruishan Zhang1, Zhuangkai Liu1, Shuang Li1, Hong Xu1.
Abstract
The PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway play a critical role in balancing cell growth and death. Epidemiologic studies suggested that mutations of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway genes are associated with cancer risk, yet no data are available for PTEN rs701848, PIK3CA rs2699887, and AKT1 rs2494752 polymorphism and breast cancer(BC) risk. A case-control study was performed in 920 BC patients and 908 healthy controls using the TaqMan assay method. Overall, individuals with PTEN rs701848 TC, CC and TC/CC genotypes showed significant increased BC risk (P=0.043, P=0.002, P=0.008, respectively), and the C allele carriers had a 1.224-fold significantly increased risk of developing BC (P= 0.003). Moreover, a higher frequency of AKT rs2494752 AG genotype was observed among cases (P=0.045). Individuals harboring rs2494752 AG/AA genotype had a vital increased susceptibility to BC in the dominant model (P=0.039). More importantly, AKT1 rs2494752 GG genotype showed significantly rates of response to NCT chemotherapy (P=0.048). Furthermore, AKT1 rs2494752 AG genotype carriers showed significantly shorter DFS time, and GG genotype as the independent prognostic factor (DFS: adjusted HR=1.523, 95% CI=1.012-2.293, P=0.044; OS: adjusted HR=2.321, 95% CI=1.281-4.204, P=0.005). Moreover, MDR analysis consistently revealed that the combination of 3 selected SNPs and 7 known risk factors represented the best model to predicting BC prognosis. The luciferase assay showed that the G allele of rs2494752 significantly increased AKT1 promoter activity. These results suggest that PTEN rs701848 and AKT1 rs2494752 polymorphisms might be a candidate pharmacogenomic factor to assess the susceptibility of BC and response and prognosis prediction for interindividualized CE(A)F chemotherapy in BC patients.Entities:
Keywords: PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway; breast cancer; genetic polymorphisms; prognosis; susceptibility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28423632 PMCID: PMC5386760 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Frequency distribution of PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway genotypes and their associations with the risk for developing BC
| Genotypes | No. of cases | % | No. of controls† | % | p‡ | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | 215 | 24.4 | 273 | 30.0 | 1 | ||
| TC | 468 | 53.2 | 474 | 52.1 | 0.043 | 1.254 | 1.006-1.562 |
| CC | 197 | 22.4 | 163 | 17.9 | 0.002 | 1.535 | 1.167-2.018 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| TT | 215 | 24.4 | 273 | 30.0 | 1 | ||
| TC/CC | 665 | 77.6 | 637 | 70.0 | 0.008 | 1.326 | 1.075-1.634 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| CC | 197 | 22.4 | 163 | 17.9 | 1 | ||
| TC/TT | 683 | 77.6 | 747 | 82.1 | 0.018 | 0.757 | 0.600-0.954 |
| Allele frequency | |||||||
| T allele | 898 | 51.0 | 1020 | 56.0 | 1 | ||
| C allele | 862 | 49.0 | 800 | 44.0 | 0.003 | 1.224 | 1.073-1.396 |
| GG | 671 | 76.3 | 689 | 75.7 | 1 | ||
| GA | 197 | 22.4 | 201 | 22.1 | 0.955 | 1.006 | 0.805-1.258 |
| AA | 12 | 1.4 | 20 | 2.2 | 0.185 | 0.616 | 0.299-1.270 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| GG | 671 | 76.3 | 689 | 75.7 | 1 | ||
| GA/AA | 209 | 23.7 | 221 | 24.3 | 0.791 | 0.971 | 0.782-1.206 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| AA | 12 | 1.4 | 20 | 2.2 | 1 | ||
| GA/GG | 868 | 98.6 | 890 | 97.8 | 0.183 | 1.625 | 0.790-3.345 |
| Allele frequency | |||||||
| G allele | 1539 | 87.4 | 1579 | 86.8 | 1 | ||
| A allele | 221 | 12.6 | 241 | 13.2 | 0.541 | 0.941 | 0.774-1.144 |
| AA | 271 | 30.8 | 322 | 35.4 | 1 | ||
| AG | 470 | 53.4 | 452 | 49.7 | 0.045 | 1.236 | 1.005-1.519 |
| GG | 139 | 15.8 | 136 | 14.9 | 0.183 | 1.214 | 0.912-1.617 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| GG | 139 | 15.8 | 136 | 14.9 | 1 | ||
| AG/AA | 741 | 84.2 | 774 | 85.1 | 0.039 | 1.231 | 1.010-1.499 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| AA | 271 | 30.8 | 322 | 35.4 | 1 | ||
| AG/GG | 609 | 69.2 | 588 | 64.6 | 0.618 | 0.937 | 0.724-1.211 |
| Allele frequency | |||||||
| A allele | 1012 | 57.5 | 1096 | 60.2 | 1 | ||
| G allele | 748 | 42.5 | 724 | 39.8 | 0.098 | 1.119 | 0.979-1.278 |
| Combined genotypes | |||||||
| 1 | 68 | 7.7 | 273 | 30.0 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 770 | 87.5 | 501 | 55.1 | <0.001 | 6.170 | 4.624-8.234 |
| 3 | 42 | 4.8 | 136 | 14.9 | 0.334 | 1.240 | 0.802-1.918 |
| 2+3 | 812 | 92.3 | 637 | 70.0 | <0.001 | 5.118 | 3.848-6.806 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
†The observed genotype frequency among individuals in the control group was in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p2+2pq+q2=1: p=0.092 for PTEN rs701848; p=0.299 for AKT1 rs2494752; p=0.243 for PIK3CA rs2699887).
‡p were calculated from 2-sided chi-square tests for either genotype distribution or allele frequency.
Combined genotype: 1:rs701848TT and rs2494752AA; 2: rs701848TC and rs2494752GA, rs701848TC and rs2494752AA, rs701848CC and rs2494752GA; 3: rs701848CC and rs2494752GG.
Association of PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway genetic polymorphisms with therapeutic response to neoadjuvant CE(A)F chemotherapy
| Variables | CR and PR | SD and PD | OR | 95%CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | 40 | 70.2 | 17 | 29.8 | 1 | ||
| TC | 84 | 75.7 | 27 | 24.3 | 0.953 | 0.976 | 0.431-2.207 |
| CC | 40 | 76.9 | 12 | 23.1 | 0.254 | 0.582 | 0.230-1.475 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| TT | 40 | 70.2 | 17 | 29.8 | 1 | ||
| TC/CC | 124 | 76.1 | 39 | 23.9 | 0.162 | 0.592 | 0.284-1.234 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| CC | 40 | 76.9 | 12 | 23.1 | 1 | ||
| TC/TT | 124 | 73.8 | 44 | 26.2 | 0.631 | 1.208 | 0.558-2.613 |
| GG | 124 | 75.2 | 41 | 24.8 | 1 | ||
| GA | 37 | 72.5 | 14 | 27.5 | 0.658 | 1.847 | 0.129-26.358 |
| AA | 3 | 75.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 0.651 | 1.843 | 0.123-27.701 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| GG | 124 | 75.2 | 41 | 24.8 | 1 | ||
| GA/AA | 40 | 72.7 | 15 | 27.3 | 0.926 | 1.035 | 0.499-2.146 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| AA | 3 | 75.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 1 | ||
| GA/GG | 161 | 74.5 | 55 | 25.5 | 0.651 | 0.542 | 0.038-7.682 |
| AA | 45 | 65.2 | 24 | 34.8 | 1 | ||
| AG | 86 | 76.1 | 27 | 23.9 | 0.241 | 0.528 | 0.182-1.534 |
| GG | 33 | 86.8 | 5 | 13.2 | 0.048 | 0.325 | 0.107-0.992 |
| Dominant model | |||||||
| GG | 33 | 86.8 | 5 | 13.2 | 1 | ||
| AG/AA | 131 | 72.0 | 51 | 28.0 | 0.119 | 2.270 | 0.811-6.355 |
| Recessive model | |||||||
| AA | 45 | 65.2 | 24 | 34.8 | 1 | ||
| AG/GG | 119 | 78.8 | 32 | 21.2 | 0.077 | 0.543 | 0.276-1.068 |
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.
†p, OR and 95% CIs were calculated by unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age, menopausal status, family history of BC, tumor size, clinical stages, lymph node metastasis.
Figure 1Hstogram and box plots illustrating the frequency distribution of AKT1 rs2494752 polymorphism and stratified clinicopathological features
Frequency distribution of AKT1 rs2494752 genotypes classified by age of onset (<52 years, ≥52 years) A. and Lymph node metastasis (Node-negative, Node-positive) B.
Figure 2The relationship between the AKT1 rs2494752 polymorphism and BC prognosis according to Kaplan-Meier analysis
PIK3CA rs2699887 GA/GG genotype had longer DFS A. and OS B. in BC patients with CE(A)F regimen chemotherapy. AKT1 rs2494752 AG genotype had shorter DFS C., but no correlation with OS D. in BC patients after CE(A)F regimen chemotherapy. AKT1 rs2494752 GG genotype had shorter DFS E. and OS F. in BC patients after CE(A)F regimen chemotherapy.
Multivariate COX regression analysis of PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway polymorphisms and clininopathological features in association with DFS and OS in BC patients with CE(A)F chemotherapy
| Variables | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | 1 | 1 | ||||
| TC | 1.127 | 0.785-1.620 | 0.517 | 1.048 | 0.508-2.164 | 0.899 |
| CC | 0.998 | 0.801-1.244 | 0.988 | 1.176 | 0.791-1.749 | 0.423 |
| Dominant model | ||||||
| TT | 1 | 1 | ||||
| TC/CC | 1.092 | 0.773-1.545 | 0.617 | 1.152 | 0.587-2.263 | 0.681 |
| Recessive model | ||||||
| CC | 1 | 1 | ||||
| TC/TT | 1.068 | 0.748-1.524 | 0.719 | 0.702 | 0.380-1.297 | 0.259 |
| GG | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GA | 1.033 | 0.745-1.433 | 0.846 | 1.351 | 0.684-2.668 | 0.387 |
| AA | 1.028 | 0.813-1.300 | 0.818 | 1.340 | 0.870-2.064 | 0.185 |
| Dominant model | ||||||
| GG | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GA/AA | 0.704 | 0.488-1.016 | 0.061 | 1.525 | 0.829-2.804 | 0.175 |
| Recessive model | ||||||
| AA | 1 | 1 | ||||
| GA/GG | 0.384 | 0.170-0.867 | 0.021 | 0.192 | 0.059-0.619 | 0.006 |
| AA | 1 | 1 | ||||
| AG | 0.618 | 0.417-0.917 | 0.017 | 1.305 | 0.679-2.509 | 0.425 |
| GG | 1.523 | 1.012-2.293 | 0.044 | 2.321 | 1.281-4.204 | 0.005 |
| Dominant model | ||||||
| GG | 1 | 1 | ||||
| AG/AA | 0.948 | 0.621-1.447 | 0.804 | 0.633 | 0.305-1.315 | 0.220 |
| Recessive model | ||||||
| AA | 1 | 1 | ||||
| AG/GG | 1.042 | 0.761-1.427 | 0.798 | 1.463 | 0.761-2.811 | 0.254 |
| Age, yrs | ||||||
| <52 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ≥52 | 1.379 | 0.846-2.249 | 0.198 | 1.131 | 0.408-3.137 | 0.813 |
| Menopausal status | ||||||
| Premenopausal | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Postmenopausal | 0.653 | 0.402-1.060 | 0.085 | 0.946 | 0.346-2.588 | 0.915 |
| Family history of BC | ||||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.510 | 0.259-1.005 | 0.052 | 1.037 | 0.404-2.660 | 0.940 |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||
| ≤ 2.0 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| >2.0 | 2.018 | 1.298-3.137 | 0.002 | 2.175 | 0.892-5.305 | 0.087 |
| Clinical stages | ||||||
| I or II | 1 | 1 | ||||
| III or IV | 2.050 | 1.466-2.867 | 0.001 | 3.056 | 1.571-5.945 | 0.001 |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||||
| Node-negative | 1 | |||||
| Node-positive | 0.819 | 0.595-1.129 | 0.223 | 0.937 | 0.526-1.670 | 0.888 |
†p, HR(95%CI) were assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted by age, menopausal status, family history of BC, tumor size, clinical stages, lymph node metastasis.
MDR analysis for the prediction of prognosis with and without 3 SNPs genotypes
| Best interaction models | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.25(2.37-4.45) | 90/100 | <0.0001 | 8.69(4.97-15.18) |
| 1,2 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.37(2.46-4.64) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 7.92(4.58-13.69) |
| 1,2,3 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.48(2.53-4.78) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 8.07(4.67-13.96) |
| 1,2,3,4 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.40(2.48-4.66) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 8.52(4.93-14.74) |
| 1,2,3,4,5 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.46(2.53-4.75) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 8.09(4.82-13.59) |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.53(2.58-4.85) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 7.97(4.61-13.78) |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.32(2.43-4.55) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 7.97(4.75-13.38) |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.23(2.34-4.41) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 8.56(5.06-14.46) |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.55(2.59-4.87) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 8.24(4.76-14.25) |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 3.83(2.71-5.41) | 100/100 | <0.0001 | 9.34(5.48-15.92) |
Abbreviations: MDR, multifactor dimensionality reduction.
P† value for 1000-fold permutation test.
The best model with maximum cross-validation consistency and minimum prediction error rate was in bold.
labels: 1, age at diagnosis; 2, menopausal status; 3, family history; 4, tumor size; 5, clinical stages; 6, lymph node metastasis;7, histology;8, PTEN rs701848; 9, PIK3CA rs2699887;10, AKT1 rs2494752.
Figure 3Effect of the rs2494752 polymorphism on the AKT1 promoter activity
Schematic representation of reporter plasmids containing the AKT1 rs2494752 A or G allele A., and the two constructs were transiently transfected into the 293T and MCF7 cells B. Data were measured as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from 3 separate experiments that were each performed in triplicate (*P<0.05).