Literature DB >> 28419261

Challenges in adapting existing clinical natural language processing systems to multiple, diverse health care settings.

David S Carrell1, Robert E Schoen2, Daniel A Leffler3, Michele Morris4, Sherri Rose5, Andrew Baer1, Seth D Crockett6, Rebecca A Gourevitch5, Katie M Dean5, Ateev Mehrotra5,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Widespread application of clinical natural language processing (NLP) systems requires taking existing NLP systems and adapting them to diverse and heterogeneous settings. We describe the challenges faced and lessons learned in adapting an existing NLP system for measuring colonoscopy quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Colonoscopy and pathology reports from 4 settings during 2013-2015, varying by geographic location, practice type, compensation structure, and electronic health record.
RESULTS: Though successful, adaptation required considerably more time and effort than anticipated. Typical NLP challenges in assembling corpora, diverse report structures, and idiosyncratic linguistic content were greatly magnified. DISCUSSION: Strategies for addressing adaptation challenges include assessing site-specific diversity, setting realistic timelines, leveraging local electronic health record expertise, and undertaking extensive iterative development. More research is needed on how to make it easier to adapt NLP systems to new clinical settings.
CONCLUSIONS: A key challenge in widespread application of NLP is adapting existing systems to new clinical settings.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; data collection; electronic health records; information dissemination; natural language processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28419261      PMCID: PMC6080843          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  35 in total

1.  An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances.

Authors:  Alan R Aronson; François-Michel Lang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Development and evaluation of a clinical note section header terminology.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Randolph A Miller; Kevin B Johnson; Anderson Spickard
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  The promise of electronic records: around the corner or down the road?

Authors:  Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?

Authors:  Rosa L Figueroa; Qing Zeng-Treitler; Long H Ngo; Sergey Goryachev; Eduardo P Wiechmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  D A Lindberg; B L Humphreys; A T McCray
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Natural language processing as an alternative to manual reporting of colonoscopy quality metrics.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; Rebecca S Slack; Selvi Thirumurthi; Patrick M Lynch; Ethan Miller; Brian R Weston; Marta L Davila; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Robert S Bresalier; Alexander A Dekovich; Jeffrey H Lee; Sushovan Guha; Mala Pande; Boris Blechacz; Asif Rashid; Mark Routbort; Gladis Shuttlesworth; Lopa Mishra; John R Stroehlein; William A Ross
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; William K Thompson; Rajesh N Keswani; Luke V Rasmussen; Abel N Kho
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals.

Authors:  Pedro L Teixeira; Wei-Qi Wei; Robert M Cronin; Huan Mo; Jacob P VanHouten; Robert J Carroll; Eric LaRose; Lisa A Bastarache; S Trent Rosenbloom; Todd L Edwards; Dan M Roden; Thomas A Lasko; Richard A Dart; Anne M Nikolai; Peggy L Peissig; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  ConText: an algorithm for determining negation, experiencer, and temporal status from clinical reports.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; John N Dowling; Tyler Thornblade; Wendy W Chapman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 6.317

View more
  30 in total

1.  An Automated Feature Engineering for Digital Rectal Examination Documentation using Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Jung In Park; Kathleen Mary Kan; Michelle Ferrari; Daniel L Rubin; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Evaluation of Use of Technologies to Facilitate Medical Chart Review.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Joshua J Gagne; Judith C Maro; Michael D Nguyen; Nicolas Beaulieu; Jeffrey S Brown; Adee Kennedy; Margaret Johnson; Adam Wright; Li Zhou; Shirley V Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Evaluating the Portability of an NLP System for Processing Echocardiograms: A Retrospective, Multi-site Observational Study.

Authors:  Prakash Adekkanattu; Guoqian Jiang; Yuan Luo; Paul R Kingsbury; Zhenxing Xu; Luke V Rasmussen; Jennifer A Pacheco; Richard C Kiefer; Daniel J Stone; Pascal S Brandt; Liang Yao; Yizhen Zhong; Yu Deng; Fei Wang; Jessica S Ancker; Thomas R Campion; Jyotishman Pathak
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

4.  Considerations for Improving the Portability of Electronic Health Record-Based Phenotype Algorithms.

Authors:  Luke V Rasmussen; Pascal S Brandt; Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Jennifer A Pacheco; Prakash Adekkanattu; Jessica S Ancker; Fei Wang; Zhenxing Xu; Jyotishman Pathak; Yuan Luo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 5.  Evolving Role and Future Directions of Natural Language Processing in Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Fredy Nehme; Keith Feldman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Ascertaining Depression Severity by Extracting Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Scores from Clinical Notes.

Authors:  Prakash Adekkanattu; Evan T Sholle; Joseph DeFerio; Jyotishman Pathak; Stephen B Johnson; Thomas R Campion
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

7.  Incidence of interval colorectal cancer attributable to an endoscopist in clinical practice.

Authors:  Furkan U Ertem; Uri Ladabaum; Ateev Mehrotra; Shahrzad Tehranian; Zhuo Shi; Melissa Saul; Michele Morris; Seth D Crockett; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Michele Morris; David S Carrell; Sherri Rose; Zhuo Shi; Julia B Greer; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Adenoma Detection Rate Falls at the End of the Day in a Large Multi-site Sample.

Authors:  Felippe O Marcondes; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Robert E Schoen; Seth D Crockett; Michele Morris; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.