| Literature DB >> 28418887 |
Yi Huang1, Yunlong Li2, Fenfei He2, Shiqi Wang2, Yaohui Li2, Gang Ji2, Xiaonan Liu2, Qingchuan Zhao2, Jipeng Li2.
Abstract
Metastasis-associated protein family (MTA) promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis of human malignancies. However, the novel component of MTA family, MTA3 was found to play conflicting roles in human malignancies. While the expression pattern and potential function of MTA3 in colorectal cancer has not been addressed yet. In the present study, we investigated the protein expression of MTA3 by immunohistochemistry assay, analyzed its association with tumor progression, recurrence and prognosis in239 cases of patients. Results showed that MTA3 expression in colorectal cancer was significantly decreased in colorectal cancer compared with normal specimens. Its expression was found to be correlated with tumor differentiation, metastases and TNM stage. Kaplan-Meier analysis proved that MTA3 was associated with both disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer that patients with negative MTA3 expression tend to have unfavorable outcome. Moreover, cox's proportional hazards analysis showed that negative MTA3 expression was an independent prognostic marker of poor outcome. These results provided the first evidence that MTA3 level was decreased in colorectal cancer and significantly correlated with tumor cell invasion and metastasis. It also demonstrated that MTA3 might serve as a potential marker of tumor recurrence and prognosis of colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: MTA3; colorectal cancer; immunohistochemistry; prognosis; recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28418887 PMCID: PMC5514899 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1MTA3 staining in colorectal cancer detected by immunohistochemistry assay (200×)
(A) negative staining of MTA3; (B) weak positive staining of MTA3; (C) moderate ositive staining of MTA3; (D) strong positive staining of MTA3.
Association of MTA3 expression with clinical features
| Variable | MTA3 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||
| Total | 239 | 178 | 61 | |
| 0.545* | ||||
| Male | 141 | 103 | 38 | |
| Female | 98 | 75 | 23 | |
| 0.596* | ||||
| ≤ 60 | 144 | 109 | 35 | |
| > 60 | 95 | 69 | 26 | |
| Left colon | 68 | 52 | 16 | 0.890* |
| Right colon | 78 | 58 | 20 | |
| Rectum | 93 | 68 | 25 | |
| 0.204* | ||||
| ≤ 3.0 cm | 82 | 57 | 25 | |
| > 3.0 cm | 157 | 121 | 36 | |
| < 0.001* | ||||
| Well | 41 | 17 | 24 | |
| Moderately | 103 | 75 | 28 | |
| Poor | 95 | 86 | 9 | |
| 0.284* | ||||
| T1+ T2 | 92 | 65 | 27 | |
| T3+ T4 | 147 | 113 | 34 | |
| < 0.001* | ||||
| Absent | 92 | 57 | 35 | |
| Present | 147 | 121 | 26 | |
| 0.034* | ||||
| Absent | 208 | 151 | 57 | |
| Present | 31 | 28 | 3 | |
| < 0.001* | ||||
| I+ II | 92 | 57 | 35 | |
| III+ IV | 147 | 115 | 26 | |
* P value when expression levels were compared using Pearson χ2 test
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier postoperative survival analysis on disease-free survival for patients with colorectal cancer and MTA3 staining
Association of MTA3 and clinical factors with disease-free survival
| Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTA3 negative | 1.91 (1.26–2.88) | 0.002 | 1.78 (1.18–2.70) | 0.006 |
| Sex | 0.91 (0.60–1.38) | 0.907 | 0.93 (0.59–1.47) | 0.753 |
| Age at diagnosis | 1.18 (0.85–1.64) | 0.312 | 1.13 (0.81–1.56) | 0.473 |
| Tumor site | 1.22 (0.81–1.86) | 0.342 | 1.24 (0.83–1.95) | 0.356 |
| Tumor size | 1.49 (0.95–2.36) | 0.083 | 1.30 (0.59–2.85) | 0.520 |
| Differentiation status | 1.70 (1.07–2.69) | 0.026 | 1.64 (1.06–2.54) | 0.035 |
| TNM stage | 5.76 (3.12–10.65) | < 0.001 | 4.20 (1.72–10.24) | 0.002 |
* Hazard ratios in univariate models.
† Hazard ratios in multivariable models.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier postoperative survival analysis on overall survival for patients with colorectal cancer and MTA3 staining
Association of MTA3 and clinical factors with overall survival
| Unadjusted HR* (95% CI) | Adjusted HR† (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTA3 negative | 1.72 (1.12–2.62) | 0.013 | 1.60 (1.04–2.44) | 0.032 |
| Sex | 0.79 (0.52–1.21) | 0.280 | 0.85 (0.54–1.36) | 0.501 |
| Age at diagnosis | 1.18 (0.84–1.66) | 0.347 | 1.17(0.82–1.67) | 0.389 |
| Tumor site | 1.25 (0.71–2.22) | 0.440 | 1.18 (0.63–2.20) | 0.601 |
| Tumor size | 1.76 (0.86–3.06) | 0.121 | 1.73 (0.82–2.96) | 0.144 |
| Differentiation status | 2.24 (1.33–3.76) | 0.002 | 2.16 (1.28–3.61) | 0.005 |
| TNM stage | 6.43 (3.39–12.18) | < 0.001 | 4.56 (1.82–11.40) | 0.003 |
* Hazard ratios in univariate models
† Hazard ratios in multivariable models
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.