Literature DB >> 28418104

Is the nuclear refractive index lower than cytoplasm? Validation of phase measurements and implications for light scattering technologies.

Zachary A Steelman1, Will J Eldridge1, Jacob B Weintraub2, Adam Wax1.   

Abstract

The refractive index (RI) of biological materials is a fundamental parameter for the optical characterization of living systems. Numerous light scattering technologies are grounded in a quantitative knowledge of the refractive index at cellular and subcellular scales. Recent work in quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) has called into question the widely held assumption that the index of the cell nucleus is greater than that of the cytoplasm, a result which disagrees with much of the current literature. In this work, we critically examine the measurement of the nuclear and whole-cell refractive index using QPM, validating that nuclear refractive index is lower than that of cytoplasm in four diverse cell lines and their corresponding isolated nuclei. We further examine Mie scattering and phase-wrapping as potential sources of error in these measurements, finding they have minimal impact. Finally, we use simulation to examine the effects of incorrect RI assumptions on nuclear morphology measurements using angle-resolved scattering information. Despite an erroneous assumption of the nuclear refractive index, accurate measurement of nuclear morphology was maintained, suggesting that light scattering modalities remain effective.
© 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mie theory; light scattering; microscopy; nucleus; phase imaging; refractive index

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28418104      PMCID: PMC5647217          DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201600314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biophotonics        ISSN: 1864-063X            Impact factor:   3.207


  29 in total

1.  Detection of preinvasive cancer cells.

Authors:  V Backman; M B Wallace; L T Perelman; J T Arendt; R Gurjar; M G Müller; Q Zhang; G Zonios; E Kline; J A McGilligan; S Shapshay; T Valdez; K Badizadegan; J M Crawford; M Fitzmaurice; S Kabani; H S Levin; M Seiler; R R Dasari; I Itzkan; J Van Dam; M S Feld; T McGillican
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phase imaging without 2pi ambiguity by multiwavelength digital holography.

Authors:  J Gass; A Dakoff; M K Kim
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Light scattering from normal and dysplastic cervical cells at different epithelial depths: finite-difference time-domain modeling with a perfectly matched layer boundary condition.

Authors:  Dizem Arifler; Martial Guillaud; Anita Carraro; Anais Malpica; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Evaluation of hybrid algorithm for analysis of scattered light using ex vivo nuclear morphology measurements of cervical epithelium.

Authors:  Derek Ho; Tyler K Drake; Rex C Bentley; Fidel A Valea; Adam Wax
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Imaging deformation of adherent cells due to shear stress using quantitative phase imaging.

Authors:  Will J Eldridge; Adi Sheinfeld; Matthew T Rinehart; Adam Wax
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  In situ detection of nuclear atypia in Barrett's esophagus by using angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry.

Authors:  John W Pyhtila; Kevin J Chalut; Jeffrey D Boyer; Justin Keener; Thomas D'Amico; Marcia Gottfried; Frank Gress; Adam Wax
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-tissue diagnostics.

Authors:  J R Mourant; J P Freyer; A H Hielscher; A A Eick; D Shen; T M Johnson
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

8.  Tomographic phase microscopy.

Authors:  Wonshik Choi; Christopher Fang-Yen; Kamran Badizadegan; Seungeun Oh; Niyom Lue; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Wavelet transform fast inverse light scattering analysis for size determination of spherical scatterers.

Authors:  Derek Ho; Sanghoon Kim; Tyler K Drake; Will J Eldridge; Adam Wax
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Digital holographic microtomography for high-resolution refractive index mapping of live cells.

Authors:  Jing-Wei Su; Wei-Chen Hsu; Cheng-Ying Chou; Chen-Hao Chang; Kung-Bin Sung
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.207

View more
  11 in total

1.  Shear Modulus Measurement by Quantitative Phase Imaging and Correlation with Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Will J Eldridge; Silvia Ceballos; Tejank Shah; Han Sang Park; Zachary A Steelman; Stefan Zauscher; Adam Wax
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Angular range, sampling and noise considerations for inverse light scattering analysis of nuclear morphology.

Authors:  Haoran Zhang; Zachary A Steelman; Derek S Ho; Kengyeh K Chu; Adam Wax
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.207

3.  Integral refractive index imaging of flowing cell nuclei using quantitative phase microscopy combined with fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Gili Dardikman; Yoav N Nygate; Itay Barnea; Nir A Turko; Gyanendra Singh; Barham Javidi; Natan T Shaked
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Structured illumination microscopy for dual-modality 3D sub-diffraction resolution fluorescence and refractive-index reconstruction.

Authors:  Shwetadwip Chowdhury; Will J Eldridge; Adam Wax; Joseph A Izatt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Comparison of imaging fiber bundles for coherence-domain imaging.

Authors:  Zachary A Steelman; Sanghoon Kim; Evan T Jelly; Michael Crose; Kengyeh K Chu; Adam Wax
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines.

Authors:  Van K Lam; Thanh Nguyen; Thuc Phan; Byung-Min Chung; George Nehmetallah; Christopher B Raub
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  Response to Comment on "Is the nuclear refractive index lower than cytoplasm? Validation of phase measurements and implications for light scattering technologies": A Comment on "How a phase image of a cell with nucleus refractive index smaller than that of the cytoplasm should look like?", e201800033.

Authors:  Zachary A Steelman; Will J Eldridge; Adam Wax
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 8.  Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates.

Authors:  Simon Alberti; Amy Gladfelter; Tanja Mittag
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Ultraviolet Hyperspectral Interferometric Microscopy.

Authors:  Ashkan Ojaghi; Meredith E Fay; Wilbur A Lam; Francisco E Robles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Label-Free and Quantitative Dry Mass Monitoring for Single Cells during In Situ Culture.

Authors:  Ya Su; Rongxin Fu; Wenli Du; Han Yang; Li Ma; Xianbo Luo; Ruliang Wang; Xue Lin; Xiangyu Jin; Xiaohui Shan; Wenqi Lv; Guoliang Huang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.