| Literature DB >> 28417080 |
Abstract
Classical thinking in endocrine physiology squeezes our diagnostic handling into a simple negative feedback mechanism with a controller and a controlled variable. In the case of the thyroid this is reduced to TSH and fT3 and fT4, respectively. The setting of this tight notion has no free space for any additions. In this paper we want to challenge this model of limited application by proposing a construct based on a systems approach departing from two basic considerations. In first place since the majority of cases of thyroid disease develop and appear during life it has to be considered as an acquired condition. In the second place, our experience with the reversibility of morphological changes makes the autoimmune theory inconsistent. While medical complexity can expand into the era of OMICS as well as into one where manipulations with the use of knock-outs and -ins are common in science, we have preferred to maintain a simple and practical approach. We will describe the interactions of iron, magnesium, zinc, selenium and coenzyme Q10 with the thyroid axis. The discourse will be then brought into the context of ovarian function, i.e. steroid hormone production. Finally the same elemental players will be presented in relation to the basic mitochondrial machinery that supports the endocrine. We propose that an intact mitochondrial function can guard the normal endocrine function of both the thyroid as well as of the ovarian axis. The basic elements required for this function appear to be magnesium and iron. In the case of the thyroid, magnesium-ATP acts in iodine uptake and the heme protein peroxidase in thyroid hormone synthesis. A similar biochemical process is found in steroid synthesis with cholesterol uptake being the initial energy-dependent step and later the heme protein ferredoxin 1 which is required for steroid synthesis. Magnesium plays a central role in determining the clinical picture associated with thyroid disease and is also involved in maintaining fertility. With the aid of 3D sonography patients needing selenium and/or coenzyme Q10 can be easily identified. By this we firmly believe that physicians should know more about basic biochemistry and the way it fits into mitochondrial function in order to understand metabolism. Contemplating only TSH is highly reductionistic. OUTLINE: •Author's profiles and motivation for this analysis•The philosophical alternatives in science and medicine•Reductionism vs. systems approach in clinical thyroid disease guidelines•The entry into complexity: the involvement of the musculoskeletal system•Integrating East and West: teachings from Chinese Medicine and from evidence based medicine (EBM)•Can a mathematical model represent complexity in the daily thyroid practice?•How effective is thyroxine treatment?•Resolving the situation of residual symptoms in treated patients with thyroid disease•Importance of iron, zinc and magnesium in relation to thyroid function•Putting together new concepts related to thyroid function for a systems approach•Expanding our model into general aspects of medicine.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28417080 PMCID: PMC5390562 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2017.03.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BBA Clin ISSN: 2214-6474
Fig. 1Imaging of the thyroid in power Doppler mode in a case of newly diagnosed hyperthyroidism. The 2D image allows the examiner to recognize dispersed areas that correspond to vessels. The 3D image shows the complex continuous structure of vessels. This picture is associated with low CoQ10 values.
Reductionism vs. systems approach.
| The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? | The clinical applications of a systems approach |
|---|---|
| Since Descartes and the Renaissance, science, including medicine, has taken a distinct path in its analytical evaluation of the natural world. This approach can be described as one of “divide and conquer,” and it is rooted in the assumption that complex problems are solvable by dividing them into smaller, simpler, and thus more tractable units. | Reductionism, as a guiding principle, is tremendously helpful and useful. The problem with reductionism stems not from its use but from the wrongful assumption that it is the only solution. Reductionism becomes less effective when the act of dividing a problem into its parts leads to loss of important information about the whole. |