Literature DB >> 28416487

Metabolic Markers and Statistical Prediction of Serous Ovarian Cancer Aggressiveness by Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Marta Sans1, Kshipra Gharpure2, Robert Tibshirani3, Jialing Zhang1, Li Liang4, Jinsong Liu4, Jonathan H Young1, Robert L Dood2, Anil K Sood5,6,7, Livia S Eberlin8.   

Abstract

Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) results in the highest mortality among gynecological cancers, developing rapidly and aggressively. Dissimilarly, serous borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) can progress into low-grade serous carcinomas and have relatively indolent clinical behavior. The underlying biological differences between HGSC and BOT call for accurate diagnostic methodologies and tailored treatment options, and identification of molecular markers of aggressiveness could provide valuable biochemical insights and improve disease management. Here, we used desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry (MS) to image and chemically characterize the metabolic profiles of HGSC, BOT, and normal ovarian tissue samples. DESI-MS imaging enabled clear visualization of fine papillary branches in serous BOT and allowed for characterization of spatial features of tumor heterogeneity such as adjacent necrosis and stroma in HGSC. Predictive markers of cancer aggressiveness were identified, including various free fatty acids, metabolites, and complex lipids such as ceramides, glycerophosphoglycerols, cardiolipins, and glycerophosphocholines. Classification models built from a total of 89,826 individual pixels, acquired in positive and negative ion modes from 78 different tissue samples, enabled diagnosis and prediction of HGSC and all tumor samples in comparison with normal tissues, with overall agreements of 96.4% and 96.2%, respectively. HGSC and BOT discrimination was achieved with an overall accuracy of 93.0%. Interestingly, our classification model allowed identification of three BOT samples presenting unusual histologic features that could be associated with the development of low-grade carcinomas. Our results suggest DESI-MS as a powerful approach for rapid serous ovarian cancer diagnosis based on altered metabolic signatures. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2903-13. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28416487      PMCID: PMC5750373          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  46 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometric imaging for biomedical tissue analysis.

Authors:  Kamila Chughtai; Ron M A Heeren
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  BRAF mutation is associated with a specific cell type with features suggestive of senescence in ovarian serous borderline (atypical proliferative) tumors.

Authors:  Felix Zeppernick; Laura Ardighieri; Charlotte G Hannibal; Russell Vang; Jette Junge; Susanne K Kjaer; Rugang Zhang; Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  William R Hart
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Diverse functions of ceramide in cancer cell death and proliferation.

Authors:  Sahar A Saddoughi; Besim Ogretmen
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.242

5.  Cholesterol sulfate imaging in human prostate cancer tissue by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Livia S Eberlin; Allison L Dill; Anthony B Costa; Demian R Ifa; Liang Cheng; Timothy Masterson; Michael Koch; Timothy L Ratliff; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  A framework for a personalized surgical approach to ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Alpa M Nick; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 8.  Analysis of tissue specimens by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry in biological and clinical research.

Authors:  Jeremy L Norris; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Saturated fatty acid-induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. A role for cardiolipin.

Authors:  Serge Hardy; Wissal El-Assaad; Ewa Przybytkowski; Erik Joly; Marc Prentki; Yves Langelier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Glycerophosphoglycerol, Beta-alanine, and pantothenic Acid as metabolic companions of glycolytic activity and cell migration in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Antje Hutschenreuther; Gerd Birkenmeier; Marina Bigl; Knut Krohn; Claudia Birkemeyer
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2013-11-27
View more
  34 in total

1.  Analytical challenges of shotgun lipidomics at different resolution of measurements.

Authors:  Jianing Wang; Xianlin Han
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 12.296

2.  Real-time lipid patterns to classify viable and necrotic liver tumors.

Authors:  Pierre-Maxence Vaysse; Heike I Grabsch; Mari F C M van den Hout; Marc H A Bemelmans; Ron M A Heeren; Steven W M Olde Damink; Tiffany Porta Siegel
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 3.  Advances in mass spectrometry imaging coupled to ion mobility spectrometry for enhanced imaging of biological tissues.

Authors:  Marta Sans; Clara L Feider; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Specific N-Linked Glycosylation Patterns in Areas of Necrosis in Tumor Tissues.

Authors:  Danielle A Scott; Kim Norris-Caneda; Laura Spruill; Evelyn Bruner; Yuko Kono; Peggi M Angel; Anand S Mehta; Richard R Drake
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system.

Authors:  Jialing Zhang; John Rector; John Q Lin; Jonathan H Young; Marta Sans; Nitesh Katta; Noah Giese; Wendong Yu; Chandandeep Nagi; James Suliburk; Jinsong Liu; Alena Bensussan; Rachel J DeHoog; Kyana Y Garza; Benjamin Ludolph; Anna G Sorace; Anum Syed; Aydin Zahedivash; Thomas E Milner; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry imaging to detect lipid biomarkers and disease signatures in cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Holzlechner; Eliseo Eugenin; Brendan Prideaux
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12

7.  Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Proteins Directly from Biological Tissue Sections.

Authors:  Kyana Y Garza; Clara L Feider; Dustin R Klein; Jake A Rosenberg; Jennifer S Brodbelt; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  How to Apply Supervised Machine Learning Tools to MS Imaging Files: Case Study with Cancer Spheroids Undergoing Treatment with the Monoclonal Antibody Cetuximab.

Authors:  David Hua; Xin Liu; Eden P Go; Yijia Wang; Amanda B Hummon; Heather Desaire
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 9.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Review of Emerging Advancements and Future Insights.

Authors:  Amanda Rae Buchberger; Kellen DeLaney; Jillian Johnson; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  The Importance of Clinical Tissue Imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spraggins; Kristina Schwamborn; Ron M A Heeren; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Clin Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.