Literature DB >> 25707631

A framework for a personalized surgical approach to ovarian cancer.

Alpa M Nick1, Robert L Coleman1, Pedro T Ramirez1, Anil K Sood2.   

Abstract

The standard approach for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer is upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by a combination of platinum-based and taxane-based chemotherapy. The extent of residual disease following upfront cytoreductive surgery correlates with objective response to adjuvant chemotherapy, rate of pathological complete response at second-look assessment operations, and progression-free survival and overall survival. Contemporary data and meta-analyses indicate a correlation between volume of residual disease and patient outcome, with those patients undergoing complete gross resection having the best outcomes. Thus, attention has focused on surgical efforts to remove as much disease as possible with the metric of 'optimal' cytoreduction being R0 disease. Because patients with R0 resection seem to have the best overall outcomes, preoperative or intraoperative assessment to avoid unnecessary primary debulking surgery has become common. The use of serum CA-125 levels, physical examination and CT imaging have lacked accuracy in determining if disease can be optimally debulked. Therefore, an algorithm that identifies patients in whom complete gross resection at primary surgery is likely to be achieved would be expected to improve patient survival. We discuss contemporary definitions of 'optimal' residual disease, and opportunities to personalize surgical therapy and improve the quality of surgical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25707631      PMCID: PMC4528308          DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  48 in total

1.  Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Giorgia Garganese; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Vito Carone; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A multicenter study of CA 125 level as a predictor of non-optimal primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  O Gemer; M Lurian; M Gdalevich; V Kapustian; E Piura; D Schneider; O Lavie; T Levy; A Fishman; R Dgani; H Levavi; U Beller
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  A study to evaluate the utility of presurgical CA125 to predict optimal tumor cytoreduction of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mitra Modares Gilani; Mojgan Karimi Zarchi; Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami; Nadereh Behtash; Azam Sadat Mousavi; Soheila Ansaripoor
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Allison E Axtell; Margaret H Lee; Robert E Bristow; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Steven Raman; John P Weaver; Mojan Gabbay; Michael Ngo; Scott Lentz; Ilana Cass; Andrew J Li; Beth Y Karlan; Christine H Holschneider
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Bristow; L R Duska; N C Lambrou; E K Fishman; M J O'Neill; E L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Factors associated with cytoreducibility among women with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Gamal H Eltabbakh; Sharon L Mount; Barbara Beatty; Linda Simmons-Arnold; Kumarasen Cooper; Anne Morgan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  The utility of computed tomography scans in predicting suboptimal cytoreductive surgery in women with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Sally A Mullany; Kathy R Brandt; Bonnie J Huppert; William A Cliby
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO).

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Alexander Reuss; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Philipp Harter; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jacobus Pfisterer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A multicenter prospective trial evaluating the ability of preoperative computed tomography scan and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Pedro T Ramirez; Debra M Sarasohn; Jerrold B Teitcher; Svetlana Mironov; Revathy B Iyer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Harold Paul; Masayoshi Hosaka; Carol A Aghajanian; Mario M Leitao; Ginger J Gardner; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Hedvig Hricak; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomographic prediction of optimal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  B E Nelson; A T Rosenfield; P E Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  62 in total

1.  Concordance of laparoscopic and laparotomic peritoneal cancer index using a two-step surgical protocol to select patients for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Federico Migliorelli; Mathilde Del; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Manon Daix; Sarah Bétrian; Erwan Gabiache; Gisèle Balagué; Sophie Leclerc; Eliane Mery; Laurence Gladieff; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; G Larry Maxwell; Austin Miller; Chad A Hamilton; Bunja Rungruang; Noah Rodriguez; Scott D Richard; Thomas C Krivak; Jeffrey M Fowler; David G Mutch; Linda Van Le; Roger B Lee; Peter Argenta; David Bender; Krishnansu S Tewari; David Gershenson; James J Java; Michael A Bookman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Predictors of optimal cytoreduction in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Time to incorporate laparoscopic assessment into the standard of care.

Authors:  Natalia Rodriguez Gómez-Hidalgo; Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon; Alpa M Nick; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Fluorescence Guidance in Surgical Oncology: Challenges, Opportunities, and Translation.

Authors:  Madeline T Olson; Quan P Ly; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Platelets reduce anoikis and promote metastasis by activating YAP1 signaling.

Authors:  Monika Haemmerle; Morgan L Taylor; Tony Gutschner; Sunila Pradeep; Min Soon Cho; Jianting Sheng; Yasmin M Lyons; Archana S Nagaraja; Robert L Dood; Yunfei Wen; Lingegowda S Mangala; Jean M Hansen; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Kshipra M Gharpure; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Sun Young Yim; Ju-Seog Lee; Cristina Ivan; Wei Hu; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Stephen T Wong; Beth Y Karlan; Douglas A Levine; Jinsong Liu; Vahid Afshar-Kharghan; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Pooled Clustering of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Gene Expression Leads to Novel Consensus Subtypes Associated with Survival and Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Sebastian M Armasu; Kimberly R Kalli; Matthew J Maurer; Ethan P Heinzen; Gary L Keeney; William A Cliby; Ann L Oberg; Scott H Kaufmann; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system.

Authors:  Jialing Zhang; John Rector; John Q Lin; Jonathan H Young; Marta Sans; Nitesh Katta; Noah Giese; Wendong Yu; Chandandeep Nagi; James Suliburk; Jinsong Liu; Alena Bensussan; Rachel J DeHoog; Kyana Y Garza; Benjamin Ludolph; Anna G Sorace; Anum Syed; Aydin Zahedivash; Thomas E Milner; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  High expression of integrin αvβ3 enables uptake of targeted fluorescent probes into ovarian cancer cells and tumors.

Authors:  Scott K Shaw; Cynthia L Schreiber; Felicia M Roland; Paul M Battles; Seamus P Brennan; Simon J Padanilam; Bradley D Smith
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Qin C Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Farah A Alvi; Amr El Haraki; Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Carol Aghajanian; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.