| Literature DB >> 28410964 |
Fabian Hilbert1, Tobias Wech2, Henning Neubauer2, Simon Veldhoen2, Thorsten Alexander Bley2, Herbert Köstler2.
Abstract
Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) is most commonly applied to acquire diffusion-weighted MR-images. EPI is able to capture an entire image in very short time, but is prone to distortions and artifacts. In diffusion-weighted EPI of the kidney severe distortions may occur due to intestinal gas. Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) is robust against distortions and artifacts, but needs more time to acquire an entire image compared to EPI. Therefore, TSE is more sensitive to motion during the readout. In this study we compare diffusion-weighted TSE and EPI of the human kidney with regard to intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Images were acquired with b-values between 0 and 750s/mm2 with TSE and EPI. Distortions were observed with the EPI readout in all volunteers, while the TSE images were virtually distortion-free. Fractional anisotropy of the diffusion tensor was significantly lower for TSE than for EPI. All other parameters of DTI and IVIM were comparable for TSE and EPI. Especially the main diffusion directions yielded by TSE and EPI were similar. The results demonstrate that TSE is a worthwhile distortion-free alternative to EPI for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney at 3Tesla.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusionstensorbildgebung; Echo Planar Imaging; Echoplanar Bildgebung; Intravoxel Incoherent Motion; Niere; Turbo Spin Echo; diffusion tensor imaging; intravoxel incoherent motion; kidney
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28410964 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.12.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Z Med Phys ISSN: 0939-3889 Impact factor: 4.820