Literature DB >> 29883637

Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia1, Yousuf M Khalifa2, Mark R Buckley3.   

Abstract

Corneal endothelial cell (CEC) loss occurs from tissue manipulation during anterior segment surgery and corneal transplantation as well as from contact with synthetic materials like intraocular lenses and tube shunts. While several studies have quantified CEC loss for specific surgical steps, the vulnerability of CECs to isolated, controllable and measurable mechanical forces has not been assessed previously. The purpose of this study was to develop an experimental testing platform where the susceptibility of CECs to controlled mechanical trauma could be measured. The corneal endothelial surfaces of freshly dissected porcine corneas were subjected to a range of indentation forces via a spherical stainless steel bead. A cell viability assay in combination with high-resolution fluorescence microscopy was used to visualize and quantify injured/dead CEC densities before and after mechanical loading. In specimens subjected to an indentation force of 9 mN, the mean ± SD peak contact pressure P0 was 18.64 ± 3.59 kPa (139.81 ± 26.93 mmHg) in the center of indentation and decreased radially outward. Injured/dead CEC densities were significantly greater (p ≤ 0.001) after mechanical indentation of 9 mN (167 ± 97 cells/mm2) compared to before indentation (39 ± 52 cells/mm2) and compared to the sham group (34 ± 31 cells/mm2). In specimens subjected to "contact only" - defined as an applied indentation force of 0.65 mN - the peak contact pressure P0 was 7.31 ± 1.5 kPa (54.83 ± 11.25 mmHg). In regions where the contact pressures was below 78% of P0 (<5.7 kPa or 42.75 mmHg), injured/dead CEC densities were within the range of CEC loss observed in the sham group, suggesting negligible cell death. These findings indicate that CECs are highly susceptible to mechanical trauma via indentation, supporting the established "no-touch" policy for ophthalmological procedures. While CECs can potentially remain viable below contact pressures of 5.7 kPa (42.75 mmHg), this low threshold suggests that prevention of indentation-associated CEC loss may be challenging.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cataract surgery; Corneal endothelial cell density; Corneal endothelial cell loss; Corneal endothelium; Mechanical trauma; Surgical trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29883637      PMCID: PMC6497073          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  51 in total

Review 1.  Identity and regulation of ion transport mechanisms in the corneal endothelium.

Authors:  Joseph A Bonanno
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Corneal endothelial status in the subtypes of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Ramanjit Sihota; N Chinna Lakshmaiah; Jawahar S Titiyal; Tanuj Dada; Harish C Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of inserting forceps on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using an in vitro delivery model and vital dye assay.

Authors:  Takeshi Ide; Sonia H Yoo; James M Goldman; Victor Perez; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  An easy and inexpensive method for quantitative analysis of endothelial damage by using vital dye staining and Adobe Photoshop software.

Authors:  Hisham A Saad; Mark A Terry; Neda Shamie; Edwin S Chen; Daniel F Friend; Jeffrey D Holiman; Christopher Stoeger
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.

Authors:  Allan Storr-Paulsen; Jens Christian Norregaard; Shakil Ahmed; Thomas Storr-Paulsen; Tina Hyldebrandt Pedersen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effects of intraocular epinephrine on the corneal endothelium of rabbits.

Authors:  Shiow-Wen Liou; Cheng-Jen Chiu; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature.

Authors:  L J Müller; E Pels; G F Vrensen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Effect of a previous acute angle closure attack on the corneal endothelial cell density in chronic angle closure glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Clement C Y Tham; Yolanda Y Y Kwong; Jimmy S M Lai; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  A modified technique for descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Massimo Busin; Priya R Bhatt; Vincenzo Scorcia
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

10.  Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal transplantation with a low-energy, liquid-interface system.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Liu; Fernando Morales-Wong; Moushmi Patil; Sang Beom Han; Nyein C Lwin; Ericia Pei Wen Teo; Heng Pei Ang; Nur Zah M Yussof; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Unraveling the mechanobiology of cornea: From bench side to the clinic.

Authors:  Shu Yang; Jing Zhang; Youhua Tan; Yan Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.