Sara Salerno1, Christoph P Hornik, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, P Brian Smith, Lawrence C Ku, Matthew S Kelly, Reese Clark, Daniel Gonzalez. 1. From the *Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; †Department of Pediatrics, and ‡Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and §Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc., Sunrise, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Piperacillin, in combination with tazobactam, is frequently used in infants for treating nosocomial infections, although safety data in this population are limited. Electronic health record (EHR) data can be used to evaluate drug safety in infants, but measures of drug exposure are lacking. METHODS: To relate simulated piperacillin exposure with adverse events (AEs) in infants using EHR data, we identified infants discharged from 333 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group between 1997 and 2012. Using a previously published population pharmacokinetic model in the target population, we simulated piperacillin steady state area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to τ (AUCss,0-τ) and steady state maximal drug concentration (Cmaxss). Next, we used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between simulated AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss with clinical AEs (seizure and rash) and laboratory AEs controlling for gestational age. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing the third versus the first tertiles for AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss were reported. RESULTS: We identified 746 infants with a median (interquartile range) gestational age of 30 weeks (26-33) and postnatal age of 11 days (6-25). The median (interquartile range) piperacillin dose was 225 mg/kg/d (176-300). No significant associations were found between simulated piperacillin exposure (AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss) and clinical and laboratory AEs. CONCLUSIONS: We found no associations between predicted piperacillin exposures and the occurrence of AEs. This study confirms the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics and EHR to relate drug exposure with safety.
BACKGROUND: Piperacillin, in combination with tazobactam, is frequently used in infants for treating nosocomial infections, although safety data in this population are limited. Electronic health record (EHR) data can be used to evaluate drug safety in infants, but measures of drug exposure are lacking. METHODS: To relate simulated piperacillin exposure with adverse events (AEs) in infants using EHR data, we identified infants discharged from 333 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group between 1997 and 2012. Using a previously published population pharmacokinetic model in the target population, we simulated piperacillin steady state area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to τ (AUCss,0-τ) and steady state maximal drug concentration (Cmaxss). Next, we used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between simulated AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss with clinical AEs (seizure and rash) and laboratory AEs controlling for gestational age. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing the third versus the first tertiles for AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss were reported. RESULTS: We identified 746 infants with a median (interquartile range) gestational age of 30 weeks (26-33) and postnatal age of 11 days (6-25). The median (interquartile range) piperacillin dose was 225 mg/kg/d (176-300). No significant associations were found between simulated piperacillin exposure (AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss) and clinical and laboratory AEs. CONCLUSIONS: We found no associations between predicted piperacillin exposures and the occurrence of AEs. This study confirms the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics and EHR to relate drug exposure with safety.
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: L S Miall; M J Henderson; A J Turner; K G Brownlee; J T Brocklebank; S J Newell; V L Allgar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Adriana Tremoulet; Jennifer Le; Brenda Poindexter; Janice E Sullivan; Matthew Laughon; Paula Delmore; Andrea Salgado; Sandy Ian-U Chong; Chiara Melloni; Jamie Gao; Daniel K Benjamin; Edmund V Capparelli; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Christoph P Hornik; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith; Michael J Pencina; Adriana H Tremoulet; Edmund V Capparelli; Jessica E Ericson; Reese H Clark; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 6.314
Authors: Christoph P Hornik; Andrew M Atz; Catherine Bendel; Francis Chan; Kevin Downes; Robert Grundmeier; Ben Fogel; Debbie Gipson; Matthew Laughon; Michael Miller; Michael Smith; Chad Livingston; Cindy Kluchar; Anne Heath; Chanda Jarrett; Brian McKerlie; Hetalkumar Patel; Christina Hunter Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Rachel G Greenberg; Huali Wu; Anil Maharaj; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kay M Tomashek; Blaire L Osborn; Reese H Clark; Emmanuel B Walter Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.806
Authors: Shufan Ge; Ryan J Beechinor; Christoph P Hornik; Joseph F Standing; Kanecia Zimmerman; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Matthew M Laughon; Reese Clark; Daniel Gonzalez Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 5.938