PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th percentile. Secondary objectives were to analyze these results according to NT thickness, below or above 3.5 mm, and those without associated anomalies. METHODS: This observational single-cohort study was conducted between 2015 and 2018 in fetuses with NT > 95th percentile. Following an invasive test, quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was performed, and if normal, CMA was performed. Pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), non-reported pathogenic CNV, pathogenic autosomal recessive variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were analysed. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty-two fetuses with NT > 95th percentile, normal QF-PCR and CMA were included. Amongst 128 fetuses with NT between the 95th percentile and 3.5 mm, one (0.8%) had a pathogenic CNV, four (3.1%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.8%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and 13 (10.2%) had VUS. Amongst 34 fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm, four (11.8%) had pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and four (11.8%) had VUS. Four in 162 (2.5%) fetuses had CNVs at the chromosome 16p13.11 region. Amongst 154 fetuses without structural abnormalities and normal QF-PCR, three (1.9%) had a pathogenic CNV, 5 (3.2%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.6%) autosomal recessive pathogenic CNV and 16 (10.4%) had VUS. CONCLUSION: Pathogenic CNVs were found in 1% of fetuses with an NT thickness between the 95th percentile and 3.5 mm and in 12% of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. CNVs were found at the 16p13.11 region in 2.5% of cases.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th percentile. Secondary objectives were to analyze these results according to NT thickness, below or above 3.5 mm, and those without associated anomalies. METHODS: This observational single-cohort study was conducted between 2015 and 2018 in fetuses with NT > 95th percentile. Following an invasive test, quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was performed, and if normal, CMA was performed. Pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), non-reported pathogenic CNV, pathogenic autosomal recessive variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were analysed. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty-two fetuses with NT > 95th percentile, normal QF-PCR and CMA were included. Amongst 128 fetuses with NT between the 95th percentile and 3.5 mm, one (0.8%) had a pathogenic CNV, four (3.1%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.8%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and 13 (10.2%) had VUS. Amongst 34 fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm, four (11.8%) had pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and four (11.8%) had VUS. Four in 162 (2.5%) fetuses had CNVs at the chromosome 16p13.11 region. Amongst 154 fetuses without structural abnormalities and normal QF-PCR, three (1.9%) had a pathogenic CNV, 5 (3.2%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.6%) autosomal recessive pathogenic CNV and 16 (10.4%) had VUS. CONCLUSION: Pathogenic CNVs were found in 1% of fetuses with an NT thickness between the 95th percentile and 3.5 mm and in 12% of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. CNVs were found at the 16p13.11 region in 2.5% of cases.
Authors: S C Hillman; S Pretlove; A Coomarasamy; D J McMullan; E V Davison; E R Maher; M D Kilby Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Athena P Souka; Constantin S Von Kaisenberg; Jonathan A Hyett; Jiri D Sonek; Kypros H Nicolaides Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: M Grande; F A R Jansen; Y J Blumenfeld; A Fisher; A O Odibo; M C Haak; A Borrell Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: M Egloff; B Hervé; T Quibel; S Jaillard; G Le Bouar; K Uguen; A-H Saliou; M Valduga; E Perdriolle; C Coutton; A-L Coston; A Coussement; O Anselem; C Missirian; F Bretelle; F Prieur; C Fanget; C Muti; M-C Jacquemot; C Beneteau; C Le Vaillant; M Vekemans; L J Salomon; F Vialard; V Malan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Ronald J Wapner; Christa Lese Martin; Brynn Levy; Blake C Ballif; Christine M Eng; Julia M Zachary; Melissa Savage; Lawrence D Platt; Daniel Saltzman; William A Grobman; Susan Klugman; Thomas Scholl; Joe Leigh Simpson; Kimberly McCall; Vimla S Aggarwal; Brian Bunke; Odelia Nahum; Ankita Patel; Allen N Lamb; Elizabeth A Thom; Arthur L Beaudet; David H Ledbetter; Lisa G Shaffer; Laird Jackson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S G Hellmuth; L H Pedersen; C B Miltoft; O B Petersen; S Kjaergaard; C Ekelund; A Tabor Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: M C de Wit; M I Srebniak; L C P Govaerts; D Van Opstal; R J H Galjaard; A T J I Go Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 7.299