| Literature DB >> 28405729 |
E A L de Jonge1,2, F Koromani1,2, A Hofman1,3, A G Uitterlinden1,2, O H Franco1, F Rivadeneira2, J C Kiefte-de Jong4,5,6.
Abstract
We studied the relation between a diet that is high in acid-forming nutrients (e.g. proteins) and low in base-forming nutrients (e.g. potassium) and bone structure. We showed a negative relation, which was more prominent if proteins were of animal rather than of vegetable origin and if intake of dietary fibre was high.Entities:
Keywords: BMD; Dietary acid load; Dietary fibre; Renal function; Trabecular bone score
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28405729 PMCID: PMC5524850 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4037-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN: 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507
Characteristics in three cohorts of the Rotterdam study (RS), total n = 4672
| First cohort of the RS | Second cohort of the RS | Third cohort of the RS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Age (year)a | 78 | (75, 82) | 71 | (69, 73) | 57 | (52, 60) |
| Height (cm)a | 165 | (159,173) | 167 | (161, 175) | 170 | (164, 178) |
| Weight (kg)a | 74 | (66, 83) | 77 | (68, 86) | 78 | (69, 87) |
| Spinal TBS | 1.29 | (1.22, 1.36) | 1.30 | (1.23, 1.36) | 1.30 | (1.21, 1.37) |
| Spinal BMD (g/cm2) | 1.11 | (0.97, 1.27) | 1.12 | (0.98, 1.28) | 1.15 | (1.02, 1.30) |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day)a | 1934 | (1549, 2387) | 1955 | (1559, 2369) | 2233 | (1852, 2720) |
| Plasma vitamin D (nmol/l)a | 54 | (37, 73) | 62 | (43, 84) | 61 | (43, 82) |
| NEAP (g/mEq) | 35 | (28, 42) | 35 | (29, 42) | 36 | (30, 43) |
| VegPro/K (g/mEq | 0.23 | (0.19, 0.28) | 0.24 | (0.19, 0.28) | 0.26 | (0.21, 0.31) |
| AnPro/K (g/mEq) | 0.33 | (0.25, 0.43) | 0.33 | (0.25, 0.43) | 0.33 | (0.25, 0.43) |
| Physical activity (METh/week) | 90 | (64, 123) | 81 | (55, 108) | 43 | (18, 81) |
| eGFRcrcys (ml/min) | 65 | (56, 76) | 74 | (64, 83) | 87 | (78, 95) |
| Sex (% males) | 42 | 44 | 42 | |||
| Education (%) | ||||||
| Low | 9 | 28 | 25 | |||
| Middle | 12 | 20 | 20 | |||
| Middle-high | 16 | 25 | 21 | |||
| High | 63 | 24 | 35 | |||
| Income (%) | ||||||
| Low | 64 | 38 | 23 | |||
| Middle | 28 | 63 | 24 | |||
| Middle-high | 3 | 12 | 13 | |||
| High | 5 | 15 | 40 | |||
| Current smokers (%) | 7 | 10 | 13 | |||
| Type 2 diabetes (%) | 12 | 12 | 6 | |||
| Menopausal status (% postmenopausal)b | 97 | 92 | 77 | |||
| Use of any dietary supplement(%)c | 60 | 59 | 60 | |||
| Use of lipid lowering drugs | 34 | 32 | 27 | |||
| Use of antihypertensivesd | 23 | 17 | 6 | |||
BMD bone mineral density, BMI body mass index, HRT Hormone replacement therapy, METh metabolic equivalent of tasks in hours, TBS trabecular bone score, dPRAL dietary potential renal acid load, TPro/K total protein/potassium ratio, VegPro/K Vegetable protein/potassium ratio, AnPro/K animal protein/potassium ratio
aMedian (interquartile range)
bApplicable to females only
cUse of any dietary supplement ≥1 time/month
dIncluding diuretics
Linear associations between DAL, TBS and BMD
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | Confounders | |||
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |
| Trabecular bone score | ||||
| NEAP |
|
|
|
|
| VegPro/K |
|
|
|
|
| AnPro/K |
|
|
|
|
| Bone mineral density | ||||
| NEAP | −0.02 | (−0.05, 0.01) | −0.02 | (−0.05, 0.01) |
| VegPro/K | −0.01 | (−0.04, 0.01) | −0.00 | (−0.04, 0.03) |
| AnPro/K | −0.02 | (−0.03, 0.04) | −0.02 | (−0.05, 0.02) |
Regression coefficients represent changes in Z-scores of BMD or TBS for each Z-score increase in DAL. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, body weight and height and Rotterdam study cohort. Model 2: Model 1 + education and smoking, dietary calcium intake and alcohol consumption. Significant associations (P value <0.05) in bold
aPresence of a non-linear relationship, based on a likelihood ratio test comparing the linear model to a non-linear model
Fig. 1Non-linear associations between ratios of vegetable or animal protein to potassium and spinal trabecular bone score, reflecting trabecular bone integrity, using basic models adjusted for age, sex, body weight and height and total energy intake