OBJECTIVE: First, to validate the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ) by a 7-day diary and a pedometer in older persons. Second, to assess the repeatability of the LAPAQ. Third, to compare the feasibility of these methods. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was performed in a subsample (n=439, aged 69-92 years) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). The LAPAQ was completed twice (1998/1999, 1999/2000). Respondents completed a 7-day activity diary and wore a pedometer for 7 days (1999/2000). RESULTS: The LAPAQ was highly correlated with the 7-day diary (r=0.68, P<.001), and moderately with the pedometer (r=0.56, P<.001). The repeatability of the LAPAQ was reasonably good (weighted kappa: 0.65-0.75). The LAPAQ was completed in 5.7+/-2.7 min, and 0.5% of the respondents had missing values. CONCLUSION: The LAPAQ appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for classifying physical activity in older people. The LAPAQ was easier to use than the 7-day diary and pedometer.
OBJECTIVE: First, to validate the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ) by a 7-day diary and a pedometer in older persons. Second, to assess the repeatability of the LAPAQ. Third, to compare the feasibility of these methods. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was performed in a subsample (n=439, aged 69-92 years) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). The LAPAQ was completed twice (1998/1999, 1999/2000). Respondents completed a 7-day activity diary and wore a pedometer for 7 days (1999/2000). RESULTS: The LAPAQ was highly correlated with the 7-day diary (r=0.68, P<.001), and moderately with the pedometer (r=0.56, P<.001). The repeatability of the LAPAQ was reasonably good (weighted kappa: 0.65-0.75). The LAPAQ was completed in 5.7+/-2.7 min, and 0.5% of the respondents had missing values. CONCLUSION: The LAPAQ appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for classifying physical activity in older people. The LAPAQ was easier to use than the 7-day diary and pedometer.
Authors: Nadia Sourial; Howard Bergman; Sathya Karunananthan; Christina Wolfson; Jack Guralnik; Hélène Payette; Luis Gutierrez-Robledo; Dorly J H Deeg; John D Fletcher; Maria T E Puts; Bin Zhu; François Béland Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Erik J Timmermans; Suzan van der Pas; Elaine M Dennison; Stefania Maggi; Richard Peter; Maria Victoria Castell; Nancy L Pedersen; Michael D Denkinger; Mark H Edwards; Federica Limongi; Florian Herbolsheimer; Mercedes Sánchez-Martínez; Paola Siviero; Rocio Queipo; Laura A Schaap; Dorly J H Deeg Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2016-08-24
Authors: Floor Neelemaat; Abel Thijs; Jaap C Seidell; Judith E Bosmans; Marian A E van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren Journal: Nutr J Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Anneleen Kuijsten; Eric J G Sijbrands; Frank J A van Rooij; Johanna M Geleijnse; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Edith J M Feskens Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 19.112