| Literature DB >> 28405362 |
Sunil Kumar1, Stephen R Smith2, Geoff Fowler2, Costas Velis3, S Jyoti Kumar4, Shashi Arya1, Rakesh Kumar1, Christopher Cheeseman2.
Abstract
India faces major environmental challenges associated with waste generation and inadequate waste collection, transport, treatment and disposal. Current systems in India cannot cope with the volumes of waste generated by an increasing urban population, and this impacts on the environment and public health. The challenges and barriers are significant, but so are the opportunities. This paper reports on an international seminar on 'Sustainable solid waste management for cities: opportunities in South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries' organized by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute and the Royal Society. A priority is to move from reliance on waste dumps that offer no environmental protection, to waste management systems that retain useful resources within the economy. Waste segregation at source and use of specialized waste processing facilities to separate recyclable materials has a key role. Disposal of residual waste after extraction of material resources needs engineered landfill sites and/or investment in waste-to-energy facilities. The potential for energy generation from landfill via methane extraction or thermal treatment is a major opportunity, but a key barrier is the shortage of qualified engineers and environmental professionals with the experience to deliver improved waste management systems in India.Entities:
Keywords: India; population growth; resource recovery; sustainable development; waste management; waste to energy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28405362 PMCID: PMC5383819 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Population growth in India between 1911 and 2011. Source: Provisional Population Totals-India, 2011.
| census year | population × 106 | decadal growth ×106 | average annual exponential growth rate (%) | progressive growth rate compared with 1911 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1911 | 252.0 | 13.7 | 0.56 | 5.75 |
| 1921 | 251.3 | −0.8 | −0.03 | 5.42 |
| 1931 | 278.9 | 27.6 | 1.04 | 17.02 |
| 1941 | 318.6 | 39.7 | 1.33 | 33.67 |
| 1951 | 361.1 | 42.4 | 1.25 | 51.47 |
| 1961 | 439.2 | 78.1 | 1.96 | 84.25 |
| 1971 | 548.1 | 108.9 | 2.20 | 129.94 |
| 1981 | 683.3 | 135.1 | 2.22 | 186.64 |
| 1991 | 846.4 | 163.1 | 2.16 | 255.05 |
| 2001 | 1028.7 | 182.3 | 1.97 | 331.52 |
| 2011 | 1210.2 | 181.4 | 1.64 | 407.64 |
Major cities in India and per capita waste generation data (2010–2011). Source: *Census of India 2011, #CPCB Report 2011.
| city | *population (2011) × 106 | #total waste generated in tonnes per day | waste generation (kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmedabad | 6.3 | 2300 | 0.36 |
| Hyderabad | 7.7 | 4200 | 0.54 |
| Bangalore | 8.4 | 3700 | 0.44 |
| Chennai | 8.6 | 4500 | 0.52 |
| Kolkata | 14.1 | 3670 | 0.26 |
| Delhi | 16.3 | 5800 | 0.41 |
| Mumbai | 18.4 | 6500 | 0.35 |
Waste generation per capita in Indian cities. Source: Kumar et al. [13,14].
| population | waste generation rate (kg |
|---|---|
| cities with a population <0.1 million (eight cities) | 0.17–0.54 |
| cities with a population of 0.1–0.5 million (11 cities) | 0.22–0.59 |
| Cities with a population 1–2 million (16 cities) | 0.19–0.53 |
| Cities with a population >2 million (13 cities) | 0.22–0.62 |
Figure 1.State-level statistics of MSW generation in India (2009–2012). Source: Central Pollution Control Board, Govt. of India, 2012.
Average (% by weight) composition of MSW in Indian metro cities. Source: Sharholy et al. [16].
| percentage (%) by weight | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compostable | inert | paper | plastic | glass | metals | textile | leather |
| 41 | 40 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
Predicted population growth and overall impact on waste generation. Source: Amepu [21].
| year | population (×106) | total waste generation (x 103 Tonnes per year) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 197.3 | 0.439 | 31.63 |
| 2011 | 260.1 | 0.498 | 47.30 |
| 2021 | 342.8 | 0.569 | 71.15 |
| 2031 | 451.8 | 0.649 | 107.01 |
| 2036 | 518.6 | 0.693 | 131.24 |
| 2041 | 595.4 | 0.741 | 160.96 |
Figure 2.Cumulative land required (km2) for disposal of MSW. Source: Singhal & Pandey [29].
State-wisea status of MSW processing facilities in India in 2011. Source: Planning Commission 2014 [20].
| state | composting | vermicomposting | biomethanation | pelletization | waste to energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andaman and Nicobar | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Andhra Pradesh | 24 | nil | nil | 11 | 2 |
| Assam | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Chandigarh | Nil | nil | nil | 1 | nil |
| Chattisgarh | 6 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Delhi | 3 | nil | nil | nil | 3 |
| Goa | 14 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Gujarat | 3 | 93 | nil | 6 | nil |
| Himachal Pradesh | 10 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Jammu and Kashmir | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Jharkhand | 4 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Kerala | 21 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 7 | nil | nil | 2 | nil |
| Maharashtra | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Meghalaya | 1 | 1 | nil | nil | nil |
| Nagaland | 1 | 1 | nil | nil | nil |
| Orissa | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Punjab | 1 | 3 | nil | nil | nil |
| Sikkim | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| Tamil Nadu | 162 | 24 | nil | 3 | nil |
| Tripura | 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| West Bengal | 13 | 7 | nil | nil | nil |
| total | 279 | 138 | 172 | 29 | 8 |
aAll other states and UTs currently have no processing facilities.
Landfill sites associated with different cities in India. Source: Parvathamma [31].
| city | number of landfills | area of landfills (hectare) |
|---|---|---|
| Chennai | 2 | 465.5 |
| Coimbatore | 2 | 292 |
| Surat | 1 | 200 |
| Greater Mumbai | 3 | 140 |
| Greater Hyderabad | 1 | 121.5 |
| Ahmadabad | 1 | 84 |
| Delhi | 3 | 66.4 |
| Jabalpur | 1 | 60.7 |
| Indore | 1 | 59.5 |
| Madurai | 1 | 48.6 |
| Greater Bangalore | 2 | 40.7 |
| Greater Vishakhapatnam | 1 | 40.5 |
| Ludhiana | 1 | 40.4 |
| Nasik | 1 | 34.4 |
| Jaipur | 3 | 31.4 |
| Srinagar | 1 | 30.4 |
| Kanpur | 1 | 27 |
| Kolkata | 1 | 24.7 |
| Chandigarh | 1 | 18 |
| Ranchi | 1 | 15 |
| Raipur | 1 | 14.6 |
| Meerut | 2 | 14.2 |
| Guwahati | 1 | 13.2 |
| Thiruvananthapuram | 1 | 12.5 |