| Literature DB >> 33188266 |
V Murugesan1, D Joshua Amarnath2.
Abstract
Vegetable Market have become major sources of class="Chemical">organic waste. Some of such waste wheclass="Chemical">n beiclass="Chemical">ng diverted to laclass="Chemical">ndfills class="Chemical">not oclass="Chemical">nly iclass="Chemical">ncrease the laclass="Chemical">ndfill loadiclass="Chemical">ng but also coclass="Chemical">ntribute to iclass="Chemical">ncrease greeclass="Chemical">nhouse gas emissioclass="Chemical">n. Of the maclass="Chemical">ny techclass="Chemical">nologies available iclass="Chemical">n haclass="Chemical">ndliclass="Chemical">ng such hugely geclass="Chemical">nerated waste, composticlass="Chemical">ng has proveclass="Chemical">n very effective for decades. Eclass="Chemical">nzyme aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">n-eclass="Chemical">nzyme mediated aerobic composticlass="Chemical">ng of vegetable market complex waste (VMCW) have beeclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">nvestigated. Coclass="Chemical">nveclass="Chemical">ntioclass="Chemical">nal composticlass="Chemical">ng techclass="Chemical">nique though beiclass="Chemical">ng capable of haclass="Chemical">ndliclass="Chemical">ng large quaclass="Chemical">ntum of waste are fouclass="Chemical">nd to coclass="Chemical">nsume more time. Proveclass="Chemical">n to be disadvaclass="Chemical">ntages factor. Iclass="Chemical">n the preseclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">nvestigatioclass="Chemical">n, the pre-cultured seed iclass="Chemical">noculums used for vegetable market complex waste, shorteclass="Chemical">ned the typical composticlass="Chemical">ng period from 45 to 9 days for the first time. Also, rapid size aclass="Chemical">nd volume reductioclass="Chemical">n of VMCW was witclass="Chemical">nessed. The orgaclass="Chemical">nic degradatioclass="Chemical">n of VMCW was observed as 42% (82 ± 2.83% to 40.82 ± 0.61%), with a volume reductioclass="Chemical">n from 0.012m3 to 0.003 m3 withiclass="Chemical">n 9 days. Aclass="Chemical">n eclass="Chemical">nriched class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">ntsEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33188266 PMCID: PMC7666227 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75766-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Aerobic composting setup.
Figure 2(a) Composition of VMCW at source. (b) Composition after sample collection.
Characterization of VMCW.
| Parameter | Initial | Final |
|---|---|---|
| C/N | 13.84 | 2.35 |
| Empirical formula | C16H25NO4 | C10H17.9 N |
| CEV (kJ/kg of TS) | 25.05 | 19.45 |
Figure 3(a) Effect of temperature on composting, (b) effect of pH on composting, (c) effect of C/N ratio during the composting process, (d) evolution of volume reduction organic strength reduction and mineralisation.
Figure 4(a) VMCW at Initial and Final stage of composting, (b) CHN concentration at Initial and Final stage of composting.
Figure 8Microbial growth rate of composting process.
Vegetable Market Complex Waste (VMCW) Composition.
| Days elapsed | TS (% of waste) | VS (% of TS) | Ash (% of TS) | Moisture (% of waste) | C (% TS) | H (% TS) | N (% TS) | C/N ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 19.78 ± 0.35 | 82.11 ± 2.83 | 17.89 ± 2.83 | 80.22 ± 0.35 | 53.72 | 6.94 | 3.88 | 13.84 |
| 3 | 35.89 ± 3.09 | 79.24 ± 2.31 | 20.76 ± 2.31 | 64.11 ± 3.09 | 73.00 | 5.44 | 6.10 | 11.95 |
| 5 | 45.71 ± 7.17 | 74.03 ± 2.96 | 25.97 ± 2.96 | 54.29 ± 7.17 | 74.62 | 12.01 | 4.29 | 17.39 |
| 7 | 55.89 ± 2.81 | 70.77 ± 3.13 | 29.23 ± 3.13 | 44.11 ± 3.13 | 37.18 | 5.50 | 4.34 | 4.16 |
| 9 | 81.63 ± 0.29 | 40.82 ± 0.62 | 59.18 ± 0.62 | 18.37 ± 0.29 | 24.35 | 8.81 | 10.94 | 2.35 |
Figure 5Linear relation between (a) VS and Volume reduction, (b) VS and CEV.
Figure 6XRD spectra of VMCW compost.
Figure 7Comparison of NPK of present study with published results.
Figure 9Determination of bio-kinetic constants.