Melania Manco1, Giuseppe Nolfe2, Zoltan Pataky3, Lucilla Monti4, Francesca Porcellati5, Rafael Gabriel6, Asimina Mitrakou7, Geltrude Mingrone8. 1. Bambino Gesu` Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Research Unit for Multi-factorial Diseases, Obesity and Diabetes, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: melania.manco@opbg.net. 2. Institute of Applied Science and Intelligent Systems "E. Caianiello" (ISASI), National Research Council of Italy-CNR, Pozzuoli, Italy. Electronic address: g.nolfe@libero.it. 3. Médecin-adjointe agree, Département de médecine communautaire et de premier recours; Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Switzerland. Electronic address: Zoltan.pataky@hcuge.ch. 4. Unità di Malattie Metaboliche Medicina 1, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.. Electronic address: monti.lucilla@hsr.it. 5. DiMI, University of Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: f.porcellati@alice.it. 6. Instituto de Salud Carlos III., Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: Rafael.gabriel@salud.madrid.it. 7. Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: minamitrakopu@gmail.com. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: geltrude.mingrone@unicatt.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study whether the shape of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-glucose curve is a stable trait over time; it is associated with differences in insulin sensitivity, ß-cell function and risk of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and glucose tolerance (IGT) in the Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease (RISC) cohort. METHODS: OGTT-glucose curve shape was classified as monophasic, biphasic, triphasic and anomalous in 915 individuals. Oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS), Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI) and ß-cell function were assessed at baseline and 3years apart. RESULTS: The OGTT-glucose curve had the same baseline shape after 3years in 540 people (59%; κ=0.115; p<0.0001). Seventy percent of the participants presented with monophasic OGTT-glucose curve shape at baseline and after 3years (percent positive agreement 0.74). Baseline monophasic shape was associated with significant increased risk of IFG (OR 1.514; 95% CI 1.084-2.116; p=0.015); biphasic shape with reduced risk of IGT (OR 0.539; 95% CI 0.310-0.936) and triphasic shape with reduced risk of IFG (OR 0.493; 95% CI 0.228-1.066; P=0.043) after 3years. Increased risks of IFG (OR 1.509; 95% CI 1.008-2.260; p=0.05) and IGT (OR 1.947; 95% CI 1.085-3.494; p=0.02) were found in people who kept stable monophasic morphology over time and in switchers from biphasic to monophasic shape (OR of IGT=3.085; 95% CI 1.377-6.912; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: After 3years follow-up, the OGTT-glucose shape was stable in 59% of the RISC cohort. Shapes were associated with different OGIS and ß-cell function; persistence over time of the monophasic shape and switch from biphasic to monophasic shape with increased risk of impaired glucose metabolism.
OBJECTIVE: To study whether the shape of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-glucose curve is a stable trait over time; it is associated with differences in insulin sensitivity, ß-cell function and risk of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and glucose tolerance (IGT) in the Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease (RISC) cohort. METHODS: OGTT-glucose curve shape was classified as monophasic, biphasic, triphasic and anomalous in 915 individuals. Oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS), Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI) and ß-cell function were assessed at baseline and 3years apart. RESULTS: The OGTT-glucose curve had the same baseline shape after 3years in 540 people (59%; κ=0.115; p<0.0001). Seventy percent of the participants presented with monophasic OGTT-glucose curve shape at baseline and after 3years (percent positive agreement 0.74). Baseline monophasic shape was associated with significant increased risk of IFG (OR 1.514; 95% CI 1.084-2.116; p=0.015); biphasic shape with reduced risk of IGT (OR 0.539; 95% CI 0.310-0.936) and triphasic shape with reduced risk of IFG (OR 0.493; 95% CI 0.228-1.066; P=0.043) after 3years. Increased risks of IFG (OR 1.509; 95% CI 1.008-2.260; p=0.05) and IGT (OR 1.947; 95% CI 1.085-3.494; p=0.02) were found in people who kept stable monophasic morphology over time and in switchers from biphasic to monophasic shape (OR of IGT=3.085; 95% CI 1.377-6.912; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: After 3years follow-up, the OGTT-glucose shape was stable in 59% of the RISC cohort. Shapes were associated with different OGIS and ß-cell function; persistence over time of the monophasic shape and switch from biphasic to monophasic shape with increased risk of impaired glucose metabolism.
Authors: Kannan Kasturi; Anthony U Onuzuruike; Shwetha Kunnam; Lauren B Shomaker; Jack A Yanovski; Stephanie T Chung Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Stephanie T Chung; Joon Ha; Anthony U Onuzuruike; Kannan Kasturi; Mirella Galvan-De La Cruz; Brianna A Bingham; Rafeal L Baker; Jean N Utumatwishima; Lilian S Mabundo; Madia Ricks; Arthur S Sherman; Anne E Sumner Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2017-08-06 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Maged M Costantine; Madeline Murguia Rice; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Brian M Casey; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; Alan T N Tita; John M Thorp; Edward K Chien; Alan M Peaceman; Sean C Blackwell Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Silva Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Joon Young Kim; Fida Bacha; Christine Chan; Heba M Ismail; Lorraine E Levitt Katz; Lynne Levitsky; Jeanie B Tryggestad; Neil H White Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Silva A Arslanian; Laure El Ghormli; Joon Young Kim; Ashley H Tjaden; Elena Barengolts; Sonia Caprio; Tamara S Hannon; Kieren J Mather; Kristen J Nadeau; Kristina M Utzschneider; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Steven E Kahn; Yi-Chun Chen; Nathalie Esser; Austin J Taylor; Daniël H van Raalte; Sakeneh Zraika; C Bruce Verchere Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 25.261