Literature DB >> 28403746

Feed-Forwardness of Spinal Networks in Posture and Locomotion.

Yury Gerasimenko1,2,3,4, Dimitry Sayenko1, Parag Gad1, Chao-Tuan Liu1, Niranjala J K Tillakaratne1,5, Roland R Roy1,5, Inessa Kozlovskaya2, V Reggie Edgerton1,5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

We present a new perspective on the concept of feed-forward compared to feedback mechanisms for motor control. We propose that conceptually all sensory information in real time provided to the brain and spinal cord can be viewed as a feed-forward phenomenon. We also propose that the spinal cord continually adapts to a broad array of ongoing sensory information that is used to adjust the probability of making timely and predictable decisions of selected networks that will execute a given response. One interpretation of the term feedback historically entails responses with short delays. We propose that feed-forward mechanisms, however, range in timeframes of milliseconds to an evolutionary perspective, that is, "evolutionary learning." Continuously adapting events enable a high level of automaticity within the sensorimotor networks that mediate "planned" motor tasks. We emphasize that either a very small or a very large proportion of motor responses can be under some level of conscious vs automatic control. Furthermore, we make a case that a major component of automaticity of the neural control of movement in vertebrates is located within spinal cord networks. Even without brain input, the spinal cord routinely uses feed-forward processing of sensory information, particularly proprioceptive and cutaneous, to continuously make fundamental decisions that define motor responses. In effect, these spinal networks may be largely responsible for executing coordinated sensorimotor tasks, even those under normal "conscious" control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central pattern generation; feed-forward control; spinal automaticity; spinal cord injury; spinal learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28403746      PMCID: PMC5495622          DOI: 10.1177/1073858416683681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscientist        ISSN: 1073-8584            Impact factor:   7.519


  45 in total

Review 1.  Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects.

Authors:  J Duysens; F Clarac; H Cruse
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Somatosensory control of balance during locomotion in decerebrated cat.

Authors:  Pavel Musienko; Gregoire Courtine; Jameson E Tibbs; Vyacheslav Kilimnik; Alexandr Savochin; Alan Garfinkel; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The rodent lumbar spinal cord learns to correct errors in hindlimb coordination caused by viscous force perturbations during stepping.

Authors:  Chad Heng; Ray D de Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Motor patterns for different forms of walking: cues for the locomotor central pattern generator.

Authors:  J L Smith; P Carlson-Kuhta; T V Trank
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Control of frontal plane body motion in human stepping.

Authors:  I N Lyon; B L Day
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Why variability facilitates spinal learning.

Authors:  Matthias D Ziegler; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The relative roles of feedforward and feedback in the control of rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.422

9.  Facilitation of stepping with epidural stimulation in spinal rats: role of sensory input.

Authors:  Igor Lavrov; Grégoire Courtine; Christine J Dy; Rubia van den Brand; Andy J Fong; Yuri Gerasimenko; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Accommodation of the spinal cat to a tripping perturbation.

Authors:  Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Kenneth K Nakada; Sharon Zdunowski; Nicole Khalili; Ray D de Leon; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  19 in total

1.  Rostral lumbar segments are the key controllers of hindlimb locomotor rhythmicity in the adult spinal rat.

Authors:  Yury Gerasimenko; Chet Preston; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; Prithvi K Shah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Trunk Stability Enabled by Noninvasive Spinal Electrical Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Mrinal Rath; Albert H Vette; Shyamsundar Ramasubramaniam; Kun Li; Joel Burdick; Victor R Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Transcutaneous spinal stimulation alters cortical and subcortical activation patterns during mimicked-standing: A proof-of-concept fMRI study.

Authors:  Gerome Manson; Darryn A Atkinson; Zhaoyue Shi; Jony Sheynin; Christof Karmonik; Rachel L Markley; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  Neuroimage Rep       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Supraspinal and Afferent Signaling Facilitate Spinal Sensorimotor Network Excitability After Discomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.

Authors:  Alena Militskova; Elvira Mukhametova; Elsa Fatykhova; Safar Sharifullin; Carlos A Cuellar; Jonathan S Calvert; Peter J Grahn; Tatiana Baltina; Igor Lavrov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Taccola; D Sayenko; P Gad; Y Gerasimenko; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Sujin Lee; Nicholas Terrafranca; Hui Zhong; Amanda Turner; Yury Gerasimenko; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Alexander G Steele; Gerome A Manson; Jony Sheynin; Jeonghoon Oh; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Closed-loop control of trunk posture improves locomotion through the regulation of leg proprioceptive feedback after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Eduardo Martin Moraud; Joachim von Zitzewitz; Jenifer Miehlbradt; Sophie Wurth; Emanuele Formento; Jack DiGiovanna; Marco Capogrosso; Grégoire Courtine; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Brain-controlled modulation of spinal circuits improves recovery from spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marco Bonizzato; Galyna Pidpruzhnykova; Jack DiGiovanna; Polina Shkorbatova; Natalia Pavlova; Silvestro Micera; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Redundancy and multifunctionality among spinal locomotor networks.

Authors:  Bau N Pham; Jiangyuan Luo; Harnadar Anand; Olivia Kola; Pia Salcedo; Connie Nguyen; Sarah Gaunt; Hui Zhong; Alan Garfinkel; Niranjala Tillakaratne; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.