Literature DB >> 29786465

Trunk Stability Enabled by Noninvasive Spinal Electrical Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Mrinal Rath1,2, Albert H Vette3,4, Shyamsundar Ramasubramaniam2, Kun Li5, Joel Burdick5, Victor R Edgerton1,2,6,7,8, Yury P Gerasimenko2,9, Dimitry G Sayenko2,10.   

Abstract

Electrical neuromodulation of spinal networks improves the control of movement of the paralyzed limbs after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the potential of noninvasive spinal stimulation to facilitate postural trunk control during sitting in humans with SCI has not been investigated. We hypothesized that transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the lumbosacral enlargement can improve trunk posture. Eight participants with non-progressive SCI at C3-T9, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A or C, performed different motor tasks during sitting. Electromyography of the trunk muscles, three-dimensional kinematics, and force plate data were acquired. Spinal stimulation improved trunk control during sitting in all tested individuals. Stimulation resulted in elevated activity of the erector spinae, rectus abdominis, and external obliques, contributing to improved trunk control, more natural anterior pelvic tilt and lordotic curve, and greater multi-directional seated stability. During spinal stimulation, the center of pressure (COP) displacements decreased to 1.36 ± 0.98 mm compared with 4.74 ± 5.41 mm without stimulation (p = 0.0156) in quiet sitting, and the limits of stable displacement increased by 46.92 ± 35.66% (p = 0.0156), 36.92 ± 30.48% (p = 0.0156), 54.67 ± 77.99% (p = 0.0234), and 22.70 ± 26.09% (p = 0.0391) in the forward, backward, right, and left directions, respectively. During self-initiated perturbations, the correlation between anteroposterior arm velocity and the COP displacement decreased from r = 0.5821 (p = 0.0007) without to r = 0.5115 (p = 0.0039) with stimulation, indicating improved trunk stability. These data demonstrate that the spinal networks can be modulated transcutaneously with tonic electrical spinal stimulation to physiological states sufficient to generate a more stable, erect sitting posture after chronic paralysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neuromodulation; paralysis; seated posture; transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation; trunk stability and control

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29786465      PMCID: PMC6205803          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  76 in total

1.  Trajectories of target reaching arm movements in individuals with spinal cord injury: effect of external trunk support.

Authors:  J Reft; Z Hasan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder muscle activity.

Authors:  K Schüldt; J Ekholm; K Harms-Ringdahl; G Németh; U P Arborelius
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Enhancement of voluntary motor function following spinal cord stimulation--case study.

Authors:  G Barolat; J B Myklebust; W Wenninger
Journal:  Appl Neurophysiol       Date:  1986

4.  Feasibility of closed-loop controller for righting seated posture after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Julie O Murphy; Musa L Audu; Lisa M Lombardo; Kevin M Foglyano; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

Review 5.  Seating and mobility considerations for people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J L Minkel
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-07

6.  Effects of stimulating hip and trunk muscles on seated stability, posture, and reach after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Michael E Miller; Lisa M Lombardo; Musa L Audu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Dynamic control of posture across locomotor tasks.

Authors:  Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 10.338

8.  cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations.

Authors:  Birk Diedenhofen; Jochen Musch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A neuroprosthesis for control of seated balance after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Musa L Audu; Lisa M Lombardo; John R Schnellenberger; Kevin M Foglyano; Michael E Miller; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Body Position Influences Which Neural Structures Are Recruited by Lumbar Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Matthias Krenn; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Andrea Toth; Winfried Mayr; Karen Minassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  39 in total

1.  Crossed activation of thoracic trunk motoneurons by medullary reticulospinal neurons.

Authors:  Brandon K LaPallo; Andrea Giorgi; Marie-Claude Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Complications of epidural spinal stimulation: lessons from the past and alternatives for the future.

Authors:  Giuliano Taccola; Sean Barber; Phillip J Horner; Humberto A Cerrel Bazo; Dimitry Sayenko
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Motor Function in Rats With Chemically Induced Parkinsonism.

Authors:  Hui Zhong; Chunni Zhu; Yoshihiko Minegishi; Franziska Richter; Sharon Zdunowski; Roland R Roy; Bryce Vissel; Parag Gad; Yury Gerasimenko; Marie-Francoise Chesselet; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Activity-Based Therapy Targeting Neuromuscular Capacity After Pediatric-Onset Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Andrea L Behrman; Laura C Argetsinger; MacKenzie T Roberts; Danielle Stout; Jennifer Thompson; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Shelley A Trimble
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

5.  Effect of spinal cord injury on neural encoding of spontaneous postural perturbations in the hindlimb sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Jaimie B Dougherty; Gregory D Disse; Nathaniel R Bridges; Karen A Moxon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Enabling respiratory control after severe chronic tetraplegia: an exploratory case study.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Evgeniy Kreydin; Hui Zhong; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Mrinal Rath; Adam R Ferguson; Joel W Burdick; Leif A Havton; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Alexander G Steele; Gerome A Manson; Jony Sheynin; Jeonghoon Oh; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sudden stop detection and automatic seating support with neural stimulation during manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Kevin M Foglyano; Lisa M Lombardo; John R Schnellenberger; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Lateral Corticospinal Tract and Dorsal Column Damage: Predictive Relationships With Motor and Sensory Scores at Discharge From Acute Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Andrew C Smith; Denise R O'Dell; Stephanie R Albin; Jeffrey C Berliner; David Dungan; Eli Robinson; James M Elliott; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.