| Literature DB >> 28403174 |
Jenny Lund1, Arild C Rustan1, Nils G Løvsletten1, Jonathan M Mudry2, Torgrim M Langleite3, Yuan Z Feng1, Camilla Stensrud1, Mari G Brubak1, Christian A Drevon3, Kåre I Birkeland4, Kristoffer J Kolnes5, Egil I Johansen5, Daniel S Tangen5, Hans K Stadheim5, Hanne L Gulseth4, Anna Krook2, Eili T Kase1, Jørgen Jensen5, G Hege Thoresen1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Physical activity has preventive as well as therapeutic benefits for overweight subjects. In this study we aimed to examine effects of in vivo exercise on in vitro metabolic adaptations by studying energy metabolism in cultured myotubes isolated from biopsies taken before and after 12 weeks of extensive endurance and strength training, from healthy sedentary normal weight and overweight men.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28403174 PMCID: PMC5389842 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of materials and respective producers.
| Material | Producer |
|---|---|
| Nunc™ Cell Culture Treated Flasks with Filter Caps | ThermoFisher Scientific (Roskilde, Denmark) |
| Nunc™ 96-MicroWell™ plates | |
| Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit | |
| SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate | |
| O´GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder | |
| Antibody against phosphorylated IRS1 at Tyr612 (#44-816G) | |
| Primers for TaqMan PCR | |
| DMEM-Glutamax™ low glucose with sodium pyruvate | Gibco Invitrogen (Gibco, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) |
| FBS | |
| Trypsin-EDTA | |
| Penicillin-streptomycin (10000 IE/ml) | |
| Amphotericin B | |
| DPBS (without Mg2+ and Ca2+) | |
| Ultroser G | Pall (Cergy-Saint-Christophe, France) |
| Insulin (Actrapid® Penfill® 100 IE/ml) | Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark) |
| Trypan blue 0.4% solution | Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, US) |
| DMSO | |
| L-glutamine | |
| BSA (essentially fatty-acid free) | |
| L-carnitine | |
| D-glucose | |
| Oleic acid (OA, 18:1, n-9) | |
| HEPES | |
| Glycogen | |
| β-mercaptoethanol | |
| Primers for PyroMark PCR and pyrosequencing | |
| 96-well Corning® CellBIND® tissue culture plates | Corning (Schiphol-Rijk, the Netherlands) |
| VWR® Grade 703 Blotting Paper | VWR (Poole, UK) |
| [1-14C]oleic acid (2.083 GBq/mmol) | PerkinElmer NEN® (Boston, MA, US) |
| D-[14C(U)]glucose (9.25 GBq/mmol) | |
| OptiPhase Supermix | PerkinElmer (Shelton, CT, US) |
| 96-well Isoplate® | |
| Unifilter®-96 GF/B | |
| TopSeal®-A transparent film | |
| MultiScreen® HTS hydrophobic filter plates with high-protein binding Immobilon-P membrane | Millipore (Billerica, MA, US) |
| GelRed™ Nucleic Acid Gel Stain 10000X in water | Biotium (Hayward, CA, US) |
| Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate | BioRad (Copenhagen, Denmark) |
| Tris/glycine buffer | |
| Tris/glycine/SDS buffer | |
| SDS | |
| Tween 20 | |
| Bromophenol blue | |
| Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)-HRP Conjugate (#170–6515) | |
| Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)-HRP Conjugate (#170–6516) | |
| Mini-Protean® TGX™ gels (4–20%) | |
| Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate | |
| Glycerol | Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) |
| Tris-HCl | |
| Amersham™ Protran™ Premium 0.45 μm NC Nitrocellulose Blotting Membrane | Amersham™ (GE Healthcare, Esbjerg, Denmark) |
| Antibodies against human total and phosphorylated Akt at Ser473 (#9272 and #9271S, respectively) | Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Beverly, MA, US) |
| Antibodies against total and phosphorylated TBC1D4 at Thr642 (#2670 and #4288, respectively) | |
| Antibodies against total and phosphorylated AMPKα at Thr172 (#2531 and #2532, respectively) | |
| Antibody against total IRS1 (#3407) | |
| Antibody against MHCIIa (#3403S) | |
| Antibody against α-tubulin (#2144) | |
| Antibody against MHCI (#MAB1628) | Millipore (Temecula, CA, US) |
| Antibodies against human total OXPHOS (#110411) | Abcam (Cambridge, UK) |
| RNeasy Mini Kit | QIAGEN (Venlo, the Netherlands) |
| DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit | |
| EpiTect Fast DNA Bisulfite Conversion Kit | |
| PyroMark® PCR Kit | |
| PyroMark® Q24 Advanced CpG Reagents | |
| PyroMark® Q24 Plate | |
| PyroMark® Wash Buffer | |
| PyroMark® Denaturation Buffer | |
| PyroMark® Q24 Cartridge | |
| Streptavidin Sepharose® High Performance beads | GE Healthcare Life Sciences (Little Chalfont, UK) |
| TaqMan reverse transcription kit reagents | Applied Biosystems (Warrington, UK) |
| MicroAmp® Optical 96-well Reaction Plate | |
| MicroAmp® Optical Adhesive Film | |
| High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit | |
| Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix |
Clinical and biochemical variables in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) and overweight men (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) at baseline (pre-training) and after 12 weeks of extensive endurance and strength training (post-training).
| Pre-training all donors | Post-training all donors | Pre-training normal weight | Post-training normal weight | Pre-training overweight | Post-training overweight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 18 | 18 (17 | 7 | 7 (6 | 11 | 11 |
| Age, y | 50.4 ± 1.6 | - | 48.0 ± 2.8 | - | 51.9 ± 1.8 | - |
| Body weight, kg | 88.6 ± 3.2 | 87.1 ± 3.0 | 78.4 ± 3.2 | 78.1 ± 3.3 | 95.1 ± 3.6 | 92.8 ± 3.5 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27.0 ± 0.9 | 26.6 ± 0.8 | 23.3 ± 0.7 | 23.3 ± 0.6 | 29.4 ± 0.7 | 28.7 ± 0.7 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.01 |
| Fat mass, % | 23.2 ± 1.2 | 22.1 ± 1.2 | 18.0 ± 1.0 | 16.8 ± 0.8 | 26.5 ± 0.9 | 25.4 ± 1.0 |
| Visceral fat area, cm2 | 138.0 ± 12.5 | 118.4 ± 9.7 | 101.6 ± 15.0 | 90.5 ± 5.9 | 161.1 ± 14.4 | 136.1 ± 13.0 |
| Fasting glucose, mmol/l | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.1 |
| GIR, mg/kg/min | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 7.8 ± 0.8 | 7.7 ± 0.7 | 9.4 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 1.0 |
| VO2max, ml/kg/min | 39.2 ± 1.1 | 44.1 ± 1.5 | 42.5 ± 0.9 | 47.1 ± 2.2 | 37.1 ± 1.5 | 42.3 ± 1.8 |
| Chest pressmax, kg | 67.5 ± 3.6 | 77.6 ± 4.0 | 61.8 ± 4.7 | 71.7 ± 6.4 | 71.1 ± 5.0 | 80.9 ± 5.1 |
| Cable pull-downmax, kg | 72.5 ± 3.3 | 82.4 ± 3.0 | 68.9 ± 3.7 | 78.3 ± 3.4 | 74.8 ± 4.9 | 84.5 ± 4.4 |
| Leg pressmax, kg | 224.9 ± 10.4 | 249.3 ± 11.7 | 192.9 ± 14.6 | 209.3 ± 13.9 | 245.2 ± 10.5 | 274.8 ± 11.7 |
Glucose infusion rate (GIR) measurements were performed with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp analysis; visceral fat area and skeletal muscle mass were based on bioelectrical impedance analysis with Tanita. Values are given as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group).
*Statistically significant vs. pre-training (p < 0.05, paired t test).
#Statistically significant vs. normal weight (p < 0.05, unpaired t test with equal SD).
†Missing data from one normal weight participant for the post-exercise tests in the two arm exercises (chest press and cable pull-down) due to an arm injury.
BMI, body mass index; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake.
Fig 1Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube fatty acid metabolism.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. Oxidation, cell-associated (CA) radioactivity and lipid accumulation of [14C]oleic acid were measured, and total cellular uptake (CO2+CA), oxidation (CO2), fractional oxidation (), and lipid accumulation were determined. (A) Lipid accumulation presented as cpm/μg protein. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (B) Oleic acid oxidation and total cellular uptake presented as nmol/mg protein. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (C) Fractional oleic acid oxidation. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (D) Fatty acid metabolism relative to before exercise. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (E) Lipid accumulation presented as cpm/μg protein in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (F) Oleic acid oxidation and total cellular uptake presented as nmol/mg protein in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (G) Fractional oleic acid oxidation in absolute values in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (H) Fatty acid metabolism relative to before exercise in study group separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS). #Statistically significant vs. normal weight group after exercise (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS). $Statistically significant vs. normal weight group (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS).
Fig 2Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube glucose metabolism.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. Oxidation and cell-associated (CA) radioactivity of [14C]glucose were measured, and total cellular uptake (CO2+CA), oxidation (CO2), and fractional oxidation () were determined. (A) Glucose oxidation and total cellular uptake presented as nmol/mg protein. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (B) Fractional glucose oxidation. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (C) Glucose metabolism relative to before exercise. Values are presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS). (D) Glucose oxidation and total cellular uptake presented as nmol/mg protein in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (E) Fractional glucose oxidation in absolute values in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (F) Glucose metabolism relative to before exercise in study group when separated by BMI. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS). $Statistically significant vs. normal weight group (p < 0.05, linear mixed-model analysis, SPSS). (G) Pearson’s test of correlation between exercise-induced changes in leg press and glucose oxidation in myotubes. Δ = after exercise–before exercise. Full line represents the regression line for all donors (n = 18, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.52, and p = 0.03), whereas stapled line represents the regression line for the overweight group (n = 11, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.68, and p = 0.02).
Fig 3Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube AMPKα phosphorylation.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. (A-C) AMPKα phosphorylation by immunoblotting. Protein was isolated and total AMPKα and pAMPKα expressions assessed by immunoblotting. A, one representative immunoblot. Bands selected from one membrane have been spliced together to show only relevant samples, as indicated by lines separating the spliced blots. B, quantified immunoblots for participants combined (n = 9) relative to before exercise. C, quantified immunoblots for study group when separated by BMI relative to normal weight before exercise (n = 5 in the normal weight group and n = 4 in the overweight group). Values are presented as means ± SEM. All samples were derived at the same time and processed in parallel.
Fig 4Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on mitochondria-related genes and proteins.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. (A) mRNA expression of PPARGC1A, PDK4, CPT1A, and CYC1 after exercise relative to before exercise. mRNA was isolated and expression assessed by qPCR. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM for all participants combined (n = 18). (B) mRNA expression of PPARGC1A, PDK4, CPT1A, and CYC1 after exercise relative to before exercise in study group when separated by BMI. mRNA was isolated and expression assessed by qPCR. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group). (C) Pearson’s test of correlation was performed between exercise-induced changes in visceral fat area and mRNA expression of PDK4 in myotubes. Δ = after exercise–before exercise. Full line represents the regression line for all donors (n = 18, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = -0.54, and p = 0.02), whereas stapled line represents the regression line for the overweight group (n = 11, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = -0.63, and p = 0.04). (D) DNA methylation of PPARGC1A, PDK4 and TFAM after exercise relative to before exercise. gDNA was isolated and bisulfite treated, and methylation assessed by immunoblotting. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 6). (E-G) OXPHOS complexes by immunoblotting. Protein was isolated and OXPHOS complexes assessed by immunoblotting. E, one representative immunoblot. F, quantified immunoblots of complex V for participants combined. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control α-tubulin, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 10). G, quantified immunoblots of complex V in study group when separated by BMI. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control α-tubulin, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 5 in each group).
Fig 5Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube expression of lipid metabolism associated genes.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. mRNA was isolated and expression assessed by qPCR. (A) mRNA expression after exercise relative to before exercise for all participants combined. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 18). (B) mRNA expression after exercise relative to before exercise for study group when separated by BMI. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 7 in the normal weight group and n = 11 in the overweight group).
Fig 6Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube Akt phosphorylation, TBC1D4 phosphorylation and glycogen synthesis with or without 100 nmol/l insulin.
Satellite cells isolated from biopsies from m. vastus lateralis before and after 12 weeks of exercise were cultured and differentiated to myotubes. (A-C) Akt phosphorylation by immunoblotting. Protein was isolated and total Akt and pAkt expressions assessed by immunoblotting. A, one representative immunoblot. B, quantified immunoblots relative to basal before exercise for participants combined. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 9). C, quantified immunoblots relative to basal before exercise for study group when separated by BMI (n = 4 in the normal weight group and n = 5 in the overweight group). (A, D and E) TBC1D4 phosphorylation by immunoblotting. Protein was isolated and total TBC1D4 and pTBC1D4 expressions assessed by immunoblotting. A, one representative immunoblot. D, quantified immunoblots relative to basal before exercise for participants combined. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 10). E, quantified immunoblots relative to basal before exercise for study group when separated by BMI (n = 5 in both groups). All samples were derived at the same time and processed in parallel. (F) Glycogen synthesis relative to basal before exercise. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5). Absolute values (range) representing 100%: Basal glycogen synthesis 3.9–15.4 nmol/mg protein. #Statistically significant vs. basal before exercise (p < 0.05, paired t test).
Fig 7Effects of 12 weeks of exercise on myotube IRS1 gene expression and IRS1 first exon DNA methylation.
(A) IRS1 mRNA expression after exercise relative to before exercise for participants combined. mRNA was isolated and expression assessed by qPCR. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 8). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, paired t test). (B) IRS1 mRNA expression after exercise relative to before exercise for study group when separated by BMI. mRNA was isolated and expression assessed by qPCR. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control GAPDH, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 in the normal weight group and n = 5 in the overweight group). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, paired t test). (C) IRS1 first exon DNA methylation after exercise relative to before exercise. gDNA was isolated and bisulfite treated, and methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing. Values are presented as means ± SEM (n = 6). *Statistically significant vs. before exercise (p < 0.05, paired t test). (D-F) IRS1 total protein expression. Protein was isolated and total IRS1 expression assessed by immunoblotting. D, one representative immunoblot. Bands selected from one membrane have been spliced together to show only relevant samples, as indicated by lines separating the spliced blots. E, quantified immunoblots relative to before exercise for participants combined. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control α-tubulin, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 9). G, quantified immunoblots relative to before exercise for study group when separated by BMI. All values were corrected for the housekeeping control α-tubulin, and presented as means ± SEM (n = 5 in the normal weight group and n = 4 in the overweight group). All samples were derived at the same time and processed in parallel.