Charles A Stuart1, Mark A South, Michelle L Lee, Melanie P McCurry, Mary E A Howell, Michael W Ramsey, Michael H Stone. 1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN; 2Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Clemmer College of Education, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN; and 3Department of Allied Health, College of Clinical and Rehabilitative Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Insulin resistance in obesity is decreased after successful diet and exercise. Aerobic exercise training alone was evaluated as an intervention in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Eighteen nondiabetic, sedentary subjects, 11 with the metabolic syndrome, participated in 8 wk of increasing intensity stationary cycle training. RESULTS: Cycle training without weight loss did not change insulin resistance in metabolic syndrome subjects or sedentary control subjects. Maximal oxygen consumption (V·O 2max), activated muscle AMP-dependent kinase, and muscle mitochondrial marker ATP synthase all increased. Strength, lean body mass, and fat mass did not change. The activated mammalian target of rapamycin was not different after training. Training induced a shift in muscle fiber composition in both groups but in opposite directions. The proportion of type 2× fibers decreased with a concomitant increase in type 2a mixed fibers in the control subjects, but in metabolic syndrome, type 2× fiber proportion increased and type 1 fibers decreased. Muscle fiber diameters increased in all three fiber types in metabolic syndrome subjects. Muscle insulin receptor expression increased in both groups, and GLUT4 expression increased in the metabolic syndrome subjects. The excess phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) at Ser337 in metabolic syndrome muscle tended to increase further after training in spite of a decrease in total IRS-1. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of weight loss, the cycle training of metabolic syndrome subjects resulted in enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis and increased the expression of insulin receptors and GLUT4 in muscle but did not decrease the insulin resistance. The failure for the insulin signal to proceed past IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation may be related to excess serine phosphorylation at IRS-1 Ser337, and this is not ameliorated by 8 wk of endurance exercise training.
INTRODUCTION:Insulin resistance in obesity is decreased after successful diet and exercise. Aerobic exercise training alone was evaluated as an intervention in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Eighteen nondiabetic, sedentary subjects, 11 with the metabolic syndrome, participated in 8 wk of increasing intensity stationary cycle training. RESULTS: Cycle training without weight loss did not change insulin resistance in metabolic syndrome subjects or sedentary control subjects. Maximal oxygen consumption (V·O 2max), activated muscle AMP-dependent kinase, and muscle mitochondrial marker ATP synthase all increased. Strength, lean body mass, and fat mass did not change. The activated mammalian target of rapamycin was not different after training. Training induced a shift in muscle fiber composition in both groups but in opposite directions. The proportion of type 2× fibers decreased with a concomitant increase in type 2a mixed fibers in the control subjects, but in metabolic syndrome, type 2× fiber proportion increased and type 1 fibers decreased. Muscle fiber diameters increased in all three fiber types in metabolic syndrome subjects. Muscle insulin receptor expression increased in both groups, and GLUT4 expression increased in the metabolic syndrome subjects. The excess phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) at Ser337 in metabolic syndrome muscle tended to increase further after training in spite of a decrease in total IRS-1. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of weight loss, the cycle training of metabolic syndrome subjects resulted in enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis and increased the expression of insulin receptors and GLUT4 in muscle but did not decrease the insulin resistance. The failure for the insulin signal to proceed past IRS-1tyrosine phosphorylation may be related to excess serine phosphorylation at IRS-1Ser337, and this is not ameliorated by 8 wk of endurance exercise training.
Authors: Edmund Cauza; Ursula Hanusch-Enserer; Barbara Strasser; Bernhard Ludvik; Sylvia Metz-Schimmerl; Giovanni Pacini; Oswald Wagner; Petra Georg; Rudolf Prager; Karam Kostner; Attila Dunky; Paul Haber Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Lori A Bateman; Cris A Slentz; Leslie H Willis; A Tamlyn Shields; Lucy W Piner; Connie W Bales; Joseph A Houmard; William E Kraus Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ronald J Sigal; Glen P Kenny; Normand G Boulé; George A Wells; Denis Prud'homme; Michelle Fortier; Robert D Reid; Heather Tulloch; Douglas Coyle; Penny Phillips; Alison Jennings; James Jaffey Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Charles A Stuart; Mary E A Howell; Jonathan D Baker; Rhesa J Dykes; Michelle M Duffourc; Michael W Ramsey; Michael H Stone Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: R V Considine; M K Sinha; M L Heiman; A Kriauciunas; T W Stephens; M R Nyce; J P Ohannesian; C C Marco; L J McKee; T L Bauer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Bouchonville; R Armamento-Villareal; K Shah; N Napoli; D R Sinacore; C Qualls; D T Villareal Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Charles A Stuart; Michelle L Lee; Mark A South; Mary E A Howell; Brian M Cartwright; Michael W Ramsey; Michael H Stone Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Charles A Stuart; William L Stone; Mary E A Howell; Marianne F Brannon; H Kenton Hall; Andrew L Gibson; Michael H Stone Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Manuela Moriggi; Sara Belloli; Pietro Barbacini; Valentina Murtaj; Enrica Torretta; Linda Chaabane; Tamara Canu; Silvia Penati; Maria Luisa Malosio; Antonio Esposito; Cecilia Gelfi; Rosa Maria Moresco; Daniele Capitanio Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Charles A Stuart; Mary E A Howell; Brian M Cartwright; Melanie P McCurry; Michelle L Lee; Michael W Ramsey; Michael H Stone Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2014-12-03
Authors: Martin G Rasmussen; Anders Grøntved; Kim Blond; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Majken K Jensen; Lars Østergaard Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jenny Lund; Arild C Rustan; Nils G Løvsletten; Jonathan M Mudry; Torgrim M Langleite; Yuan Z Feng; Camilla Stensrud; Mari G Brubak; Christian A Drevon; Kåre I Birkeland; Kristoffer J Kolnes; Egil I Johansen; Daniel S Tangen; Hans K Stadheim; Hanne L Gulseth; Anna Krook; Eili T Kase; Jørgen Jensen; G Hege Thoresen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240