Literature DB >> 28402453

Medina® Embolization Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Angiographic Effectiveness at 6 Months.

Nader-Antoine Sourour1, Saskia Vande Perre1, Federico Di Maria1, Chrysanthi Papagiannaki2, Joseph Gabrieli1,3, Silvia Pistocchi1, Bruno Bartolini1, Vincent Degos3,4, Alexandre Carpentier3,5, Jacques Chiras1,3, Frédéric Clarençon1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medina Embolization Device (MED) is a new concept device that combines the design of a detachable coil and the one of an intrasaccular flow disruption device.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and 6- to 9-mo effectiveness of this new device for the treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms.
METHODS: Twelve patients (10 females, mean age = 56 yr) with 13 wide-necked intracranial aneurysms (3 ruptured; 10 unruptured) were treated by means of the MED from January 2015 to October 2015. In 15% of the cases, MEDs were used in a standalone fashion; in 85% of the cases, additional regular coils were used. Adjunctive compliant balloon was used in 4 of 13 cases (31%). Procedure-related complications were systematically recorded; discharge and 6- to 9-mo follow-up modified Rankin Scale was assessed. Angiographic follow-up was performed with a mean delay of 5.5 ± 1.7 mo. Occlusion rate was evaluated in postprocedure and at midterm follow-up using the Roy-Raymond scale.
RESULTS: The deployment of the MED was feasible in all cases. No perforation was recorded. One case of thromboembolic complication was observed in a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm, without any clinical consequence at follow-up. Grade A occlusion rate was 61.5% in postprocedure and 83% at 6-mo follow-up. Two cases (17%) of recanalization were documented angiographically.
CONCLUSION: The MED is a new generation device combining the design of a detachable coil and an intrasaccular flow disruption device. According to our early experience, this device is safe and provides a satisfactory occlusion rate at angiographic follow-up of 6 mo.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracranial aneurysm; Intrasaccular flow disruption; Medina Embolization Device; Petals

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28402453     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  The Medina Embolic Device: Karolinska experience.

Authors:  P Bhogal; P A Brouwer; L Yeo; M Svensson; M Söderman
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Recurrence of endovascularly and microsurgically treated intracranial aneurysms-review of the putative role of aneurysm wall biology.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Mika Niemelä; Juha Hernesniemi; Juhana Frösén
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  High frequency optical coherence tomography assessment of homogenous neck coverage by intrasaccular devices predicts successful aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Robert M King; Miklos Marosfoi; Jildaz Caroff; Giovanni J Ughi; Dale M Groth; Matthew J Gounis; Ajit S Puri
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.836

4.  The Woven EndoBridge for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Results in 95 aneurysms from a single center.

Authors:  Tom De Beule; Thierry Boulanger; Sam Heye; Williem J van Rooij; Wim van Zwam; Luc Stockx
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 1.764

5.  The Combined Use of Intraluminal and Intrasaccular Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of 25 Cases.

Authors:  Pervinder Bhogal; Muhammad AlMatter; Victoria Hellstern; Oliver Ganslandt; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes; Marta Aguilar-Pérez
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage.

Authors:  Andreas Maximilian Frölich; Marie Teresa Nawka; Marielle Ernst; Isabell Frischmuth; Jens Fiehler; Jan-Hendrik Buhk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Development of New Endovascular Devices for Aneurysm Treatment.

Authors:  Zhen Yu Jia; Hai Bin Shi; Shigeru Miyachi; Sun Moon Hwang; Jae Jon Sheen; Yun Sun Song; Joong Goo Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  Endosaccular Flow Disruption: A New Frontier in Endovascular Aneurysm Management.

Authors:  Adam A Dmytriw; Mohamed M Salem; Victor X D Yang; Timo Krings; Vitor M Pereira; Justin M Moore; Ajith J Thomas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: Systematic review in an attempt to perform a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Arrese; Sergio García-García; Santiago Cepeda; Rosario Sarabia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-28

10.  The 'bendy' basilar: progressive aneurysm tilting and arterial deformation can be a delayed outcome after coiling of large basilar apex aneurysms.

Authors:  Ansaar T Rai; Abdul R Tarabishy; SoHyun Boo; Jeffrey S Carpenter; Sanjay Bhattia
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.836

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.