Literature DB >> 28401687

Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity and/or decrease sedentary behaviour among rural adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

V Cleland1, K Squibb1, L Stephens2, J Dalby1, A Timperio2, T Winzenberg1,3, K Ball2, J Dollman4.   

Abstract

Physical inactivity and overweight and obesity are more prevalent among rural than urban populations. This study aimed to review published evidence of the effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and/or decrease sedentary behaviour (SB) among rural adults and to identify factors associated with effectiveness. Seven electronic databases were searched for controlled trials of a PA or SB intervention. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models and meta-regression. Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis (n = 4,848 participants) and 12 in the meta-analysis (n = 4,820). All studies were interventions to increase PA. Overall, there was no effect on PA (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.04, 0.25) or SB (SMD 0.07; 95% CI -0.33, 0.20). In PA subgroup analyses, studies employing objective outcome measures demonstrated effects in favour of the intervention (SMD 0.65, 95% CI 0.30, 1.00), while those using self-reported measures did not (SMD 0.00; 95% CI -0.11, 0.10). This review highlights significant gaps in our understanding of how best to promote PA and reduce SB among rural adults. Future studies should use objective measures of PA as study outcomes. The absence of interventions to decrease SB is of concern, with immediate action required to address this large knowledge gap.
© 2017 World Obesity Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult; controlled trials; health behaviour; regional

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401687     DOI: 10.1111/obr.12533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  10 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions among Rural Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Scherezade K Mama; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Nishat Bhuiyan; Heather J Leach
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Cognitive function and the agreement between self-reported and accelerometer-accessed physical activity.

Authors:  Florian Herbolsheimer; Matthias W Riepe; Richard Peter
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Relationship between objectively measured intensity of physical activity and self-reported enjoyment of physical activity.

Authors:  Thea Schwaneberg; Franziska Weymar; Sabina Ulbricht; Marcus Dörr; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  Personalized Physical Activity Coaching: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Talko B Dijkhuis; Frank J Blaauw; Miriam W van Ittersum; Hugo Velthuijsen; Marco Aiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Implementation of Physical Activity Interventions in Rural, Remote, and Northern Communities: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Chelsea A Pelletier; Anne Pousette; Kirsten Ward; Robin Keahey; Gloria Fox; Sandra Allison; Drona Rasali; Guy Faulkner
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  A physical activity coaching intervention can improve and maintain physical activity and health-related outcomes in adult ambulatory hospital patients: the Healthy4U-2 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen Barrett; Stephen Begg; Paul O'Halloran; Michael Kingsley
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Student-Led Motivational Interviewing for Physical Activity Promotion among Rural Adults: A Feasibility and Acceptability Trial.

Authors:  Dziano Jenelle; Milanese Emma; Bogomolova Svetlana; Dollman James
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Modification Program Delivered under Real-World Conditions in a Rural Setting.

Authors:  Cally Jennings; Elsie Patterson; Rachel G Curtis; Anna Mazzacano; Carol A Maher
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Identifying key barriers to effective breast cancer control in rural settings.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Thomas P Ahern; Sally D Herschorn; Michelle Sowden; Donald L Weaver; Marie E Wood
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation.

Authors:  Nishat Bhuiyan; Pritika Singh; Samantha M Harden; Scherezade K Mama
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 6.457

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.