Literature DB >> 28399934

Erratum to: Can calculation of energy expenditure based on CO2 measurements replace indirect calorimetry?

Taku Oshima1, Séverine Graf2, Claudia-Paula Heidegger3, Laurence Genton2, Jérôme Pugin3, Claude Pichard2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28399934      PMCID: PMC5389009          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1650-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Erratum

During production of article [1], Funding and Competing Interests were published incorrectly due to a publisher error. The errors are detailed below.

Funding

The funding section was included in the original article as below. The study was funded by the European Society for Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism European (ESPEN), and the public Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus, Switzerland. This should have been as below instead. The study was funded by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism European (ESPEN), and the public Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus, Switzerland. The funding bodies were not involved in the study design, the interpretation of the results, or the drafting of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The Competing interests section was included in the original article as below. TO received financial support as an unrestricted academic research grant from public institutions (Geneva University Hospital) and the Foundation Nutrition 2000 Plus. CP received financial support as research grants and an unrestricted academic research grant, as well as an unrestricted research grant and consulting fees, from Abbott, Baxter, B. Braun, Cosmed, Fresenius-Kabi, Nestle Medical Nutrition, Novartis, Nutricia-Numico, Pfizer, and Solvay, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests related to the current work. This should have been seen as below. TO received financial support as an unrestricted academic research grant from public institutions (Geneva University Hospital) and the Foundation Nutrition 2000 Plus. CP received financial support as research grants and unrestricted academic research grants, as well as consulting fees from Abbott, Baxter, B. Braun, Cosmed, Fresenius-Kabi, Nestle Medical Nutrition, Novartis, Nutricia-Numico, Pfizer, and Solvay, outside the submitted work. TO, SG, CH, and CP are currently developing a new indirect calorimeter (The ICALIC study, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02796430). The study is supported by academic societies (see below) and the manufacturer involved (Cosmed, Italy) had no influence on the study conduct and the interpretation of the data in the current work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the current work.
  1 in total

1.  Can calculation of energy expenditure based on CO2 measurements replace indirect calorimetry?

Authors:  Taku Oshima; Séverine Graf; Claudia-Paula Heidegger; Laurence Genton; Jérôme Pugin; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Energy expenditure in COVID-19 mechanically ventilated patients: A comparison of three methods of energy estimation.

Authors:  Sanjith Saseedharan; Radha Reddy Chada; Vaijayanti Kadam; Annapurna Chiluka; Balakrishna Nagalla
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Validation of carbon dioxide production (VCO2) as a tool to calculate resting energy expenditure (REE) in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  I Kagan; O Zusman; I Bendavid; M Theilla; J Cohen; P Singer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.