William Mosher1, Tina Bloom2, Rosemary Hughes3, Leah Horton4, Ramin Mojtabai4, Jeanne L Alhusen5. 1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Electronic address: wmosher1@jhu.edu. 2. University of Missouri Sinclair School of Nursing, S421 Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. Electronic address: bloomt@missouri.edu. 3. University of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, 52 Corbin Hall, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. Electronic address: rosemary.hughes@mso.umt.edu. 4. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. 5. University of Virginia School of Nursing, Post Office Box 800782, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. Electronic address: jla7e@virginia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial and increasing population of US women of childbearing age live with disability. Disability-based disparities in access to family planning services have been previously documented, but few studies have used population-based data sources or evidence-based measures of disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine population-based estimates of use of family planning services among women 15-44 years of age in the United States, and to examine differences by disability status. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, the 2011-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. These analyses include 11,300 female respondents between the ages of 15 and 44 who completed in-person interviews in respondents' homes. RESULTS: Approximately 17.8% of respondents reported at least one disability in at least one domain. Women with disabilities were less likely than those without disabilities to receive services; the largest differences by disability status were seen among women with low education, low income, and those who were not working. Logistic regression analysis suggests that women with physical disabilities and those with poorer general health are less likely to receive services. CONCLUSIONS: Women living with disabilities reported lower receipt of family planning services compared to women without disabilities, but the differences were small in some subgroups and larger among disadvantaged women. Physical disabilities and poor health may be among the factors underlying these patterns. Further research is needed on other factors that affect the ability of women with disabilities to obtain the services they need to prevent unintended pregnancy.
BACKGROUND: A substantial and increasing population of US women of childbearing age live with disability. Disability-based disparities in access to family planning services have been previously documented, but few studies have used population-based data sources or evidence-based measures of disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine population-based estimates of use of family planning services among women 15-44 years of age in the United States, and to examine differences by disability status. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, the 2011-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. These analyses include 11,300 female respondents between the ages of 15 and 44 who completed in-person interviews in respondents' homes. RESULTS: Approximately 17.8% of respondents reported at least one disability in at least one domain. Women with disabilities were less likely than those without disabilities to receive services; the largest differences by disability status were seen among women with low education, low income, and those who were not working. Logistic regression analysis suggests that women with physical disabilities and those with poorer general health are less likely to receive services. CONCLUSIONS:Women living with disabilities reported lower receipt of family planning services compared to women without disabilities, but the differences were small in some subgroups and larger among disadvantaged women. Physical disabilities and poor health may be among the factors underlying these patterns. Further research is needed on other factors that affect the ability of women with disabilities to obtain the services they need to prevent unintended pregnancy.
Authors: Margaret A Nosek; Rosemary B Hughes; Susan Robinson-Whelen; Heather B Taylor; Carol A Howland Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2006 Nov-Dec