Jeanne L Alhusen1, Tina Bloom2, Kathryn Laughon3, Lillian Behan3, Rosemary B Hughes4. 1. University of Virginia School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. Electronic address: Jla7e@virginia.edu. 2. University of Missouri Sinclair School of Nursing, S421 Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. 3. University of Virginia School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. 4. University of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, 52 Corbin Hall, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women with disabilities have the same rights as women without disabilities to prevent unintended pregnancy, yet little is known about their experiences in accessing family planning methods. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative descriptive study explored perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities. METHOD: Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 31 women with diverse disabilities as part of a larger study investigating risks and facilitators of unintended pregnancy among women with disabilities across the United States. RESULTS: Analysis revealed multiple barriers experienced by women with disabilities in accessing effective family planning services needed to prevent unintended pregnancy. Barriers included physical or system barriers, financial limitations, and nonresponsive healthcare providers. Women also identified difficulties in finding appropriate family planning methods, both related and unrelated to disability. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in-depth exploration of barriers to accessing family planning services and challenges to finding effective family planning options among women with disabilities. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, improved provider training, and policy changes to optimize reproductive healthcare, improve access to family planning services, and prevent unintended pregnancy among women of childbearing age with diverse disabilities.
BACKGROUND: Women with disabilities have the same rights as women without disabilities to prevent unintended pregnancy, yet little is known about their experiences in accessing family planning methods. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative descriptive study explored perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities. METHOD: Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 31 women with diverse disabilities as part of a larger study investigating risks and facilitators of unintended pregnancy among women with disabilities across the United States. RESULTS: Analysis revealed multiple barriers experienced by women with disabilities in accessing effective family planning services needed to prevent unintended pregnancy. Barriers included physical or system barriers, financial limitations, and nonresponsive healthcare providers. Women also identified difficulties in finding appropriate family planning methods, both related and unrelated to disability. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in-depth exploration of barriers to accessing family planning services and challenges to finding effective family planning options among women with disabilities. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, improved provider training, and policy changes to optimize reproductive healthcare, improve access to family planning services, and prevent unintended pregnancy among women of childbearing age with diverse disabilities.
Authors: Courtney S Streur; Christine L Schafer; Valerie P Garcia; Elisabeth H Quint; David E Sandberg; Claire Z Kalpakjian; Daniela A Wittmann Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Jean Y Ko; Van T Tong; Jennifer M Bombard; Donald K Hayes; John Davy; Katherine A Perham-Hester Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Anna C Martinez-Hume; Allison M Baker; Hannah S Bell; Isabel Montemayor; Kristan Elwell; Linda M Hunt Journal: Cult Med Psychiatry Date: 2017-03
Authors: Monika Mitra; Karen M Clements; Jianying Zhang; Lisa I Iezzoni; Suzanne C Smeltzer; Linda M Long-Bellil Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.983