Literature DB >> 28395441

[Mutational analysis of RNA splicing machinery genes SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2 in 118 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and related diseases].

J Y Wang1, J Ma, Y N Lin, J Wang, H Shen, F M Gui, C Han, Q H Li, Z Song, X J Wang.   

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the incidence, molecular features and clinical significance of RNA splicing machinery genes mutation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and related diseases.
Methods: Mutational analysis of splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1) (K700E) , U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 1 (U2AF1) (S34, Q157P) and serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2 (SRSF2) (P95) in 118, de novo MDS and related diseases were separately performed by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by sequence analysis.
Results: Of 118 MDS patients, 76 males and 42 females, the median age was 53.5 (13-84) years old. 19.49% (23/118) had SF3B1 (K700E) mutation. As compared with those with wild type SF3B1, patients with SF3B1 K700E were of older[58 (32-78) years vs 51 (13-84) years, z=-1.981, P=0.048], lower HGB level[63 (40-95) g/L vs 77 (34-144) g/L, z=-3.192, P=0.001], higher platelet counts[121 (22-888) ×10(9)/L vs 59 (6-1 561) ×10(9)/L, z=-3.305, P=0.001], lower bone marrow blast cell counts[0.007 (0-0.122) vs 0.017 (0-0.268) , z=-2.885, P=0.004], higher ring sideroblasts percent [0 (0-64%) vs 0 (0-58%) , z=-4.664, P<0.001]. Of 105 MDS patients, 21.9% had U2AF1 (S34, Q157P) mutations. Of 107 MDS patients, 8 patients (7.48%) had SRSF2 (P95) mutations. Patients with SRSF2 mutations were older at diagnosis, the median age was 63 (50-84) years old, including 4 cases RAEB-1. The ratio of mutation was 14.29% (4/28) , and three patients transformed to AML. SF3B1 K700E and SRSF2 P95H mutations coexisted in 1 patient, and SF3B1 K700E and U2AF1 S34Y mutations were found concomitantly in 2 patients.
Conclusion: Only SF3B1 gene mutation was closely related to ring sideroblasts, it was the key to pathogenesis of MDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA mutational analysis; Gene, SF3B1; Gene, SRSF2; Gene, U2AF1; Myelodysplastic syndromes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28395441      PMCID: PMC7348387          DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0253-2727


骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)是一组异质性克隆性疾病,其发生和演变是一个多步骤累及多基因的病理过程[1]。最近,Yoshida等[2]利用全外显子测序方法发现RNA剪接体复合物蛋白编码基因突变在MDS中很常见,包括:SF3B1U2AF1SRSF2。这些基因突变发生在MDS、慢性粒-单核细胞白血病(CMML)和MDS转化的急性髓系白血病(AML)中。本文我们回顾性分析118例MDS及相关疾病患者中SF3B1SRSF2U2AF1突变情况,探讨该突变在MDS及相关疾病中的临床意义。

病例与方法

一、病例 以2013年11月至2016年3月我院就诊的118例MDS及相关疾病患者为研究对象,MDS及相关疾病诊断及分型参照文献[3]及WHO 2008分类标准,其中难治性贫血(RA)4例,难治性贫血伴环状铁粒幼红细胞(RARS)11例,难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常(RCMD)39例,难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多-1(RAEB-1)33例,RAEB-2 18例,MDS-未分类(MDS-U)2例,MDS伴单纯5q−2例,CMML1例,MDS转化的AML 8例。所有患者均有SF3B1K700E)突变分析结果,107例患者有SRSF2P95)突变分析结果,105例患者有U2AF1(S34、Q157P)突变分析结果。 二、染色体核型分析 取患者骨髓,按24 h全骨髓细胞培养法制备染色体标本,G或R显带,根据《细胞遗传学国际命名体制(ISCN2009)》进行核型分析。 三、基因检测 1.样品制备:取MDS及相关疾病患者骨髓液,Ficoll淋巴细胞分离液分离骨髓单个核细胞,用DNA提取试剂盒(德国QIAGEN公司产品)提取基因组DNA,取50 ng DNA进行PCR扩增。 2. PCR扩增:引物序列(不携带荧光标志):SF3B1K700E)引物正向序列:5′-TTGGGGC-ATAGTTAAAACCTG-3′,反向序列:5′-CCAGTTTACATTAACAAATCTGGAA-3′,扩增片段长度为456 bp;U2AF1(S34)引物正向序列:5′-TGCTGCTGACATATTCCATGT-3′,反向序列:5′-AGTCGATCACCTGCCTCACT-3′,扩增片段长度为323 bp;U2AF1Q157P)引物正向序列:5′-ATTAAAGCGTGGATGGCAAG-3′,反向序列:5′-TCCAAAGAGGACATTTGGAT-3′,扩增片段长度为524 bp;SRSF2P95)引物正向序列:5′-CAAGGTGGACAACCTGACCT-3′,反向序列:5′-AGACGCCATTTC-CCCAGT-3′,扩增片段长度为551 bp。均由苏州金唯智生物科技有限公司合成。PCR体系:反应的总体积20 µl,其中2×PCR Mix[天根生化科技(北京)有限公司]8.5 µl,DNA模板50 ng,上下游引物(10 µmol/L)各0.3 µl,ddH2O补齐。PCR条件:95 °C预变性5 min;95 °C变性30 s,56 °C退火30 s,72 °C延伸30 s,35个循环;72 °C延伸5 min。 3.测序分析基因突变:扩增产物经纯化后,分别利用上游引物在ABI 3730基因分析仪上完成测序工作。利用Sequence Analysis软件进行序列分析,测序结果与美国国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI)基因库序列进行比对。 四、统计学处理 应用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计学分析。突变组与未突变组定量资料的比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,分类资料比较采用卡方检验、Fisher确切概率法。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

一、一般临床特征 118例MDS及相关疾病患者中,男76例,女42例,中位年龄53.5(13~84)岁。初诊时WBC中位数为2.76(0.84~62.15)×109/L,HGB中位数为77(34~144)g/L,PLT中位数为70(6~1 561)×109/L,ANC中位数为1.34(0.01~7.75)×109/L。骨髓原始细胞比例中位数为0.015(0~0.268),环形铁粒幼红细胞(RS)比例中位数为0(0~64%)。114例患者有染色体核型分析结果,其中预后好63例、预后中等32例、预后差19例。57例患者可评估国际预后积分系统(IPSS)分类,其中低危8例、中危-1 31例、中危-2 13例、高危5例,将低危/中危-1合并为相对低危组,将中危-2/高危合并为相对高危组进行分析。 二、基因突变分析 1.SF3B1突变:全部118例患者均进行SF3B1K700E)基因突变分析,突变23例,其中22例为MDS,1例为MDS转化的AML,突变率为19.49%。在突变的22例MDS患者中,14例RS≥15%,其中RARS 7例、RCMD 6例、RA 1例。比较SF3B1K700E)突变组和未突变组患者的临床指标,结果见表1。与未突变组相比,突变组患者年龄偏大[58(32~78)岁对51(13~84)岁,z=−1.981,P=0.048]、PLT偏高[121(22~888)×109/L对59(6~1 561)× 109/L,z=−3.305,P=0.001]、骨髓原始细胞比例偏低[0.007(0~0.122)对0.017(0~0.268),z=−2.885,P=0.004] RS比例偏高[0(0~64)%对0(0~58)%,z=−4.664,P<0.001],HGB偏低[63(40~95)g/L对77(34~144)g/L,z=−3.192,P=0.001]。突变组与未突变组MDS亚型构成比差异有统计学意义,在MDS各亚型中,11例RARS患者中9例发生突变,RCMD的突变率为23.68%(38例中9例),RAEB-1的突变率为3.03%(33例中1例)。而性别、初诊时WBC、初诊时ANC、染色体核型、IPSS分类差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
表1

骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)及相关疾病患者SF3B1(K700E)基因突变组与未突变组临床特征比较

临床特征突变组(23例)未突变组(95例)z值/χ2P
性别(例数,男/女)13/1063/320.468
年龄[岁,M(范围)]58(32~78)51(13~84)−1.9810.048
WBC[×109/L,M(范围)]3.09(0.84~5.26)2.69(1.01~62.15)−0.5170.605
HGB[g/L,M(范围)]63(40~95)77(34~144)−3.1920.001
PLT[×109/L,M(范围)]121(22~888)59(6~1 561)−3.3050.001
ANC[×109/L,M(范围)]1.34(0.01~3.28)1.34(0.08~7.75)−1.4070.159
骨髓原始细胞比例[M(范围)]0.007(0~0.122)0.017(0~0.268)−2.8850.004
RS比例[M(范围)]0(0~64%)0(0~58%)−4.664<0.001
MDS亚型[阳性例数/总例数(%)]31.611<0.001
 RA2/22(9.09)2/87(2.30)
 RARS9/22(40.91)2/87(2.30)
 RCMD9/22(40.91)30/87(34.48)
 RAEB-11/22(4.54)32/87(36.78)
 RAEB-21/22(4.54)17/87(19.54)
 MDS-未分类02/87(2.30)
 MDS伴单纯5q−02/87(2.30)
染色体核型[阳性例数/检测例数(%)]0.0640.800
 预后好11/21(52.38)51/92(55.43)
 预后中等/预后差10/21(47.62)41/92(44.57)
IPSS分类[阳性例数/总例数(%)]0.473
 低危/中危-19/11(81.82)30/46(65.22)
 中危-2/高危2/11(18.18)16/46(34.78)

注:RS:环形铁粒幼红细胞;RA:难治性贫血;RARS:难治性贫血伴有环形铁粒幼红细胞;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;IPSS:国际预后积分系统

注:RS:环形铁粒幼红细胞;RA:难治性贫血;RARS:难治性贫血伴有环形铁粒幼红细胞;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;IPSS:国际预后积分系统 2.U2AF1突变:105例患者进行U2AF1(S34、Q157P)基因突变分析(表2),其中突变23例,突变率为21.90%。其中S34F突变11例,S34Y突变10例,Q157P突变2例。比较U2AF1(S34、Q157P)突变组和未突变组患者的临床特征,初诊时WBC、PLT和ANC水平分别为3.79(1.10~62.15)×109/L对2.76(0.84~25.45)×109/L(z=−1.950,P=0.051)、51(11~234)×109/L对73(6~888)×109/L(z=−1.904,P=0.057)及1.34(0.40~4.08)×109/L对1.31(0.01~7.75)×109/L(z=−1.912,P=0.056)。突变组与未突变组MDS亚型构成比差异无统计学意义,在MDS各亚型中,RCMD与RAEB-1的突变率分别为17.65%(34例中6例)、24.18%(29例中7例)。初诊时HGB、骨髓原始细胞比例、RS比例、性别、染色体核型、IPSS分类组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
表2

骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)及相关疾病患者U2AF1(S34、Q157P)基因突变组与未突变组临床特征比较

临床特征突变组(23例)未突变组(82例)z值/χ2P
性别(例数,男/女)18/552/301.1760.278
年龄[岁,M(范围)]46(21~70)56.5(13~84)−1.6590.097
WBC[×109/L,M(范围)]3.79(1.10~62.15)2.76(0.84~25.45)−1.9500.051
HGB[g/L,M(范围)]77(52~112)77(34~144)−0.7750.438
PLT[×109/L,M(范围)]51(11~234)73(6~888)−1.9040.057
ANC[×109/L,M(范围)]1.34(0.40~4.08)1.31(0.01~7.75)−1.9120.056
骨髓原始细胞比例[M(范围)]0.021(0.001~0.170)0.015(0~0.268)−0.4420.659
RS比例[M(范围)]0(0~25%)0(0~64%)−0.1640.870
MDS亚型[阳性例数/总例数(%)]4.6430.543
 RA1/22(4.55)3/74(4.05)
 RARS1/22(4.55)8/74(10.82)
 RCMD6/22(27.26)28/74(37.84)
 RAEB-17/22(31.82)22/74(29.73)
 RAEB-27/22(31.82)10/74(13.51)
 MDS-未分类01/74(1.35)
 MDS伴单纯5q−02/74(2.70)
染色体核型[阳性例数/检测例数(%)]0.628
 预后好10/21(47.62)45/82(54.88)
 预后中等/预后差11/21(52.38)37/82(45.12)
IPSS分类[阳性例数/总例数(%)]1.000
 低危/中危-19/14(64.29)26/39(66.67)
 中危-2/高危5/14(35.71)13/39(33.33)

注:RS:环形铁粒幼红细胞;RA:难治性贫血;RARS:难治性贫血伴有环形铁粒幼红细胞;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;IPSS:国际预后积分系统

注:RS:环形铁粒幼红细胞;RA:难治性贫血;RARS:难治性贫血伴有环形铁粒幼红细胞;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;IPSS:国际预后积分系统 3.SRSF2突变:107例患者进行SRSF2P95)基因突变分析,突变8例,突变率为7.48%。8例SRSF2P95)突变患者临床特征见表3,男6例,女2例,中位年龄63(50~84)岁。RAEB-1 4例,突变率为14.29%(28例中4例);MDS转化的AML 3例;RCMD 1例。其中SRSF2P95H)突变6例,P95R突变1例,P95_R102del 1例。
表3

8例SRSF2(P95)基因突变的骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)及相关疾病患者临床特征

例号性别年龄(岁)突变类型临床诊断WBC(×109/L)PLT(×109/L)ANC(×109/L)HGB(g/L)环形铁粒幼红细胞比例(%)骨髓原始细胞比例染色体核型IPSS分类
184P95_R102delRAEB-13.2129171140.02347,XY,+21[10]/46,XY[10]
266P95HRAEB-12.52390.71940.02346,XY[20]中危-1
357P95HRCMD1.7183700.02446,XX[20]
450P95HRAEB-13.20220.69750.09443–46,X,−X,−?12,−15,−16,−17,−20,+1-2mar,inc[cp1]中危-2
581P95HRAEB-10.02746,XY[20]
660P95HAMLa1.22440.20850.20746,XY[12]高危
769P95RAMLa3.31720.9189100.26846,XY[20]高危
876P95HAMLa3.878880.0161640.00247,XY,+8[3]/46,XY[17]中危-1

注:−:缺失;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;IPSS:国际预后积分系统;AML:急性髓系白血病。a为MDS转化的AML

注:−:缺失;RAEB:难治性贫血伴有原始细胞增多;RCMD:难治性血细胞减少伴有多系发育异常;IPSS:国际预后积分系统;AML:急性髓系白血病。a为MDS转化的AML 4.多重突变分析:1例MDS转化的AML患者同时出现SF3B1K700E)和SRSF2P95H)突变,染色体核型为预后中等,IPSS分类为中危-1。2例患者同时出现SF3B1K700E)和U2AF1(S34Y)突变,分别诊断为RCMD和RAEB-2,染色体核型均为预后差,IPSS分类1例为高危、1例为中危-2。

讨论

SF3B1突变常发生在特异的含有高计数环形铁粒幼红细胞(high-count ring siderblasts, HC-RS)(>15%)的MDS亚型中,如RARS和RCMD[6]–[9]。本组病例中,SF3B1K700E)突变23例,其中14例发生在含有HC-RSMDS亚型中(RARS 7例、RCMD 6例、RA 1例),尚有7例未检测RS。在RARS、伴随RS的RCMD中SF3B1突变率分别为64%~85%、57%~76%[2],[6],[10]–[13]。本组资料中RARS亚型的SF3B1突变率为81.82%,与文献报道一致。本研究中,仅1例MDS转化的AML患者发生SF3B1突变。此外,我们发现1例RA亦有SF3B1K700E)突变,尚未见相关文献报道。 相关文献显示,SF3B1突变可作为总生存较好及AML转化的危险度较低的独立预测指标[6],[9],[11],[14]–[15]。本研究我们未对MDS患者预后进行分析。 目前,已报道的U2AF1突变有11个,包括9个错义突变(A26V、S34F/Y、R35L、R156H/Q、Q157P/R及G213A)和2个移码突变(Q157和E159)[4],[16]–[21]。大部分突变都发生在U2AF1的两个锌指区,S34和Q157最为常见。本组病例中U2AF1的突变率为21.90%,高于文献[22]报道的11%。U2AF1突变对患者预后意义尚不明确[4],[22]。 SRSF2突变患者年龄偏高,与文献报道一致[23],有研究表明其可作为预后不良的独立影响因素[4],[22]。Thol等[4]报道SRSF2突变患者进展为AML的比例显著高于非突变组,本组8例SRSF2突变患者中有3例为MDS进展的AML,从一定程度印证了该结论。 RNA剪接体复合物蛋白编码基因突变具有排他性,一般在同一患者标本中只出现一种突变,提示其可能具有相同/替代作用的MDS致病机制;或者在同一细胞内同时突变时细胞不能耐受。然而Thol等[4]在193例MDS患者中检出4例SF3B1SRSF2基因同时突变,突变率为2.07%。本组中1例MDS转化的AML患者SF3B1SRSF2同时突变。Wu等[5]分析中国304例MDS患者,亦检测到1例ASXL1SF3B1U2AF1同时突变。其原因可能是该细胞的耐受性较好或患者体内有其他基因抵消了部分基因突变导致的致病性,具体机制尚需进一步探讨。 SF3B1U2AF1SRSF2剪接体复合物蛋白编码基因中,仅SF3B1基因突变与环形铁粒幼红细胞增多性贫血密切相关,是该亚型的主要致病基因。三种基因的预后意义有待结合患者的生存资料进一步分析。
  21 in total

1.  Prognostic irrelevance of ring sideroblast percentage in World Health Organization-defined myelodysplastic syndromes without excess blasts.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik; Curtis A Hanson; Nanna H Sulai; Janice M Hodnefield; Ryan A Knudson; Rhett P Ketterling; Terra L Lasho; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  SF3B1, a splicing factor is frequently mutated in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts.

Authors:  V Visconte; H Makishima; A Jankowska; H Szpurka; F Traina; A Jerez; C O'Keefe; H J Rogers; M A Sekeres; J P Maciejewski; R V Tiu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Mutations affecting mRNA splicing define distinct clinical phenotypes and correlate with patient outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Frederik Damm; Olivier Kosmider; Véronique Gelsi-Boyer; Aline Renneville; Nadine Carbuccia; Claire Hidalgo-Curtis; Véronique Della Valle; Lucile Couronné; Laurianne Scourzic; Virginie Chesnais; Agnes Guerci-Bresler; Bohrane Slama; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Aline Schmidt-Tanguy; Aspasia Stamatoullas-Bastard; François Dreyfus; Thomas Prébet; Stéphane de Botton; Norbert Vey; Michael A Morgan; Nicholas C P Cross; Claude Preudhomme; Daniel Birnbaum; Olivier A Bernard; Michaela Fontenay
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Kenichi Yoshida; Masashi Sanada; Yuichi Shiraishi; Daniel Nowak; Yasunobu Nagata; Ryo Yamamoto; Yusuke Sato; Aiko Sato-Otsubo; Ayana Kon; Masao Nagasaki; George Chalkidis; Yutaka Suzuki; Masashi Shiosaka; Ryoichiro Kawahata; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Makoto Otsu; Naoshi Obara; Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto; Ken Ishiyama; Hiraku Mori; Florian Nolte; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Shuichi Miyawaki; Sumio Sugano; Claudia Haferlach; H Phillip Koeffler; Lee-Yung Shih; Torsten Haferlach; Shigeru Chiba; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Satoru Miyano; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Clinical significance of SF3B1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Luca Malcovati; Elli Papaemmanuil; David T Bowen; Jacqueline Boultwood; Matteo G Della Porta; Cristiana Pascutto; Erica Travaglino; Michael J Groves; Anna L Godfrey; Ilaria Ambaglio; Anna Gallì; Matteo C Da Vià; Simona Conte; Sudhir Tauro; Norene Keenan; Ann Hyslop; Jonathan Hinton; Laura J Mudie; James S Wainscoat; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  SF3B1 mutations are prevalent in myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts but do not hold independent prognostic value.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik; Terra L Lasho; Janice M Hodnefield; Ryan A Knudson; Rhett P Ketterling; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; David P Steensma; Animesh Pardanani; Curtis A Hanson; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Emerging roles of the spliceosomal machinery in myelodysplastic syndromes and other hematological disorders.

Authors:  V Visconte; H Makishima; J P Maciejewski; R V Tiu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Clonal diversity of recurrently mutated genes in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  M J Walter; D Shen; J Shao; L Ding; B S White; C Kandoth; C A Miller; B Niu; M D McLellan; N D Dees; R Fulton; K Elliot; S Heath; M Grillot; P Westervelt; D C Link; J F DiPersio; E Mardis; T J Ley; R K Wilson; T A Graubert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  SF3B1 mutation identifies a distinct subset of myelodysplastic syndrome with ring sideroblasts.

Authors:  Luca Malcovati; Mohsen Karimi; Elli Papaemmanuil; Ilaria Ambaglio; Martin Jädersten; Monika Jansson; Chiara Elena; Anna Gallì; Gunilla Walldin; Matteo G Della Porta; Klas Raaschou-Jensen; Erica Travaglino; Klaus Kallenbach; Daniela Pietra; Viktor Ljungström; Simona Conte; Emanuela Boveri; Rosangela Invernizzi; Richard Rosenquist; Peter J Campbell; Mario Cazzola; Eva Hellström Lindberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts.

Authors:  E Papaemmanuil; M Cazzola; J Boultwood; L Malcovati; P Vyas; D Bowen; A Pellagatti; J S Wainscoat; E Hellstrom-Lindberg; C Gambacorti-Passerini; A L Godfrey; I Rapado; A Cvejic; R Rance; C McGee; P Ellis; L J Mudie; P J Stephens; S McLaren; C E Massie; P S Tarpey; I Varela; S Nik-Zainal; H R Davies; A Shlien; D Jones; K Raine; J Hinton; A P Butler; J W Teague; E J Baxter; J Score; A Galli; M G Della Porta; E Travaglino; M Groves; S Tauro; N C Munshi; K C Anderson; A El-Naggar; A Fischer; V Mustonen; A J Warren; N C P Cross; A R Green; P A Futreal; M R Stratton; P J Campbell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Clinical features and prognostic analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes patients with U2AF1 mutation].

Authors:  C Hou; S H Jiang; H J Shen; Z X Ding; M Miao; S N Chen; Y Xu; D P Wu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-14

2.  Clinical significance of cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities in 634 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Xuefen Yan; Lu Wang; Lingxu Jiang; Yingwan Luo; Peipei Lin; Wenli Yang; Yanling Ren; Liya Ma; Xinping Zhou; Chen Mei; Li Ye; Gaixiang Xu; Weilai Xu; Haiyang Yang; Chenxi Lu; Jie Jin; Hongyan Tong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 3.  Stem cell programs in cancer initiation, progression, and therapy resistance.

Authors:  Tianzhi Huang; Xiao Song; Dandan Xu; Deanna Tiek; Anshika Goenka; Bingli Wu; Namratha Sastry; Bo Hu; Shi-Yuan Cheng
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.556

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.