Literature DB >> 19186274

Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.

Govind Persad1, Alan Wertheimer, Ezekiel J Emanuel.   

Abstract

Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system-the complete lives system-which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186274     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  165 in total

1.  Lung retransplantation.

Authors:  Steven M Kawut
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 2.  The ethics and reality of rationing in medicine.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Douglas B White
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  [The distribution of health resources: a hybrid model of equality and maximization].

Authors:  Yanick Farmer
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  How should we use age to ration health care? Lessons from the case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan; Roy D Bloom; Peter L Abt; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Should Children Be Given Priority in Kidney Allocation?

Authors:  T M Wilkinson; I D Dittmer
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 6.  The redefinition of aging in American surgery.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Charles L Bosk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jörg Schmidtke; Georg Marckmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Pandemic ventilator rationing and appeals processes.

Authors:  Daniel Patrone; David Resnik
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

9.  Prioritization and willingness to pay for bariatric surgery: the patient perspective.

Authors:  Richdeep S Gill; Sumit R Majumdar; Xiaoming Wang; Rebecca Tuepah; Scott W Klarenbach; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali; Arya M Sharma; Raj S Padwal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  The social, political, ethical, and economic aspects of biodefense vaccines.

Authors:  Gregory A Poland; Robert M Jacobson; Jon Tilburt; Kristin Nichol
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.