Literature DB >> 28389913

Real-time evaluation of an image analysis system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss.

Gerhardt Konig1, Jonathan H Waters2, Mazyar Javidroozi3, Bridget Philip4, Vicki Ting5, Gaurav Abbi6, Eric Hsieh7, Griffeth Tully8, Gregg Adams9.   

Abstract

Monitoring blood loss is important for management of surgical patients. This study reviews a device (Triton) that uses computer analysis of a photograph to estimate hemoglobin (Hb) mass present on surgical sponges. The device essentially does what a clinician does when trying to make a visual estimation of blood loss by looking at a sponge, albeit with less subjective variation. The performance of the Triton system is reported upon in during real-time use in surgical procedures. The cumulative Hb losses estimated using the Triton system for 50 enrolled patients were compared with reference Hb measurements during the first quarter, half, three-quarters and full duration of the surgery. Additionally, the estimated blood loss (EBL) was calculated using the Triton measured Hb loss and compared with values obtained from both visual estimation and gravimetric measurements. Hb loss measured by Triton correlated with the reference method across the four measurement intervals. Bias remained low and increased from 0.1 g in the first quarter to 3.7 g at case completion. The limits of agreement remained narrow and increased proportionally from the beginning to the end of the cases, reaching a maximum range of -15.3 to 22.7 g. The median (IQR) difference of EBL derived from the Triton system, gravimetric method and visual estimation versus the reference value were 13 (74), 389 (287), and 4 (230) mL, respectively. Use of the Triton system to measure Hb loss in real-time during surgery is feasible and accurate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gravimetric method; Hemoglobin loss; Intraoperative blood loss; Sponge blood estimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389913      PMCID: PMC5632100          DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  19 in total

1.  Decay in blood loss estimation skills after web-based didactic training.

Authors:  Paloma Toledo; Stanley T Eosakul; Kristopher Goetz; Cynthia A Wong; William A Grobman
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Recommendations for the transfusion management of patients in the peri-operative period. II. The intra-operative period.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Francesco Bennardello; Angela Lattanzio; Pierluigi Piccoli; Gina Rossetti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Measurement of blood loss: review of the literature.

Authors:  Mavis N Schorn
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Strategies to reduce the use of blood products: a US perspective.

Authors:  Aryeh Shander; Mazyar Javidroozi
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss.

Authors:  Lisa C Zuckerwise; Christian M Pettker; Jessica Illuzzi; Cheryl R Raab; Heather S Lipkind
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Unreliability of intraoperative estimated blood loss in extended sagittal synostectomies.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Michael J Boyajian; John S Myseros; Amanda L Yaun; Robert F Keating
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Clinical evaluation of a novel system for monitoring surgical hemoglobin loss.

Authors:  Allen A Holmes; Gerhardt Konig; Vicki Ting; Bridget Philip; Thomas Puzio; Siddarth Satish; Jonathan H Waters
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Practice parameter for the use of red blood cell transfusions: developed by the Red Blood Cell Administration Practice Guideline Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  T L Simon; D C Alverson; J AuBuchon; E S Cooper; P J DeChristopher; G C Glenn; S A Gould; C R Harrison; J D Milam; K J Moise; F R Rodwig; L A Sherman; I A Shulman; L Stehling
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 10.  A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare.

Authors:  Lena Griebel; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Felix Köpcke; Dennis Toddenroth; Jan Christoph; Ines Leb; Igor Engel; Martin Sedlmayr
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Smartphones and e-tablets in perioperative medicine.

Authors:  Frederic Michard
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-09-28

2.  Triton sponge and canister app for estimating surgical blood loss.

Authors:  Abhijit S Nair; Vibhavari Naik; Narahari Busa; Basanth K Rayani
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

3.  The visually estimated blood volume in scaled canisters based on a simulation study.

Authors:  Lara Gerdessen; Vanessa Neef; Florian J Raimann; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Piekarski
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Intraoperative Blood Loss and Postoperative Pain in the Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Kun-Tsung Lee; Shiu-Shiung Lin; Kun-Jung Hsu; Chi-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hao Lee; Yu-Jen Chang; Te-Ju Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A better method for the dynamic, precise estimating of blood/haemoglobin loss based on deep learning of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Li; Li-Ge Zhang; Hong-Yu Zhi; Kun-Hua Zhong; Wen-Quan He; Yang Chen; Zhi-Yong Yang; Lin Chen; Xue-Hong Bai; Xiao-Lin Qin; Dan-Feng Li; Dan-Dan Wang; Jian-Teng Gu; Jiao-Lin Ning; Kai-Zhi Lu; Ju Zhang; Zheng-Yuan Xia; Yu-Wen Chen; Bin Yi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

6.  Do we visually estimate intra-operative blood loss better with white or green sponges and is the deviation from the real blood loss clinically acceptable? Results from a simulated scenario study.

Authors:  Florian Piekarski; Lara Gerdessen; Elke Schmitt; Linda Tanner; Florian Wunderer; Vanessa Neef; Patrick Meybohm; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Jürgen Raimann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lara Gerdessen; Patrick Meybohm; Suma Choorapoikayil; Eva Herrmann; Isabel Taeuber; Vanessa Neef; Florian J Raimann; Kai Zacharowski; Florian Piekarski
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.