Literature DB >> 28382695

Discordant non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) - a systematic review.

Tanja Schlaikjaer Hartwig1, Louise Ambye2, Steen Sørensen2, Finn Stener Jørgensen1.   

Abstract

With a high sensitivity and specificity, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is an incomparable screening test for fetal aneuploidy. However, the method is rather newly introduced, and experiences with discordant results are few. We did a systematic review of literature reporting details of false positive and false negative NIPT results. Discordant sex chromosome results were not included. We identified 22 studies reporting case details. In total, 206 discordant cases were included, of which 88% were false positive and 12% false negative. Details on maternal age, gestational age, platform/company, Z-score, fetal fraction, results and explanation were specified. The main reasons for discordant results were confined placental mosaicism, maternal copy number variation, vanished twin, maternal cancer and true fetal mosaicism. A very high percentage of cases (67%) were reported with no obvious biological or technical explanation for the discordant result. The included cases represent only a minor part of the true number of false positive or false negative NIPT cases identified in fetal medicine clinics around the world. To ensure knowledge exchange and transparency of NIPT between laboratories, we suggest a systematic recording of discordant NIPT results, as well as a quality assurance by external quality control and accreditation.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28382695     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  40 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Isochromosome 21q is overrepresented among false-negative cell-free DNA prenatal screening results involving Down syndrome.

Authors:  Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Lieve Page-Christiaens; Nicola Flowers; Michael D Bonifacio; Katie M Battese Ellis; Ida Vogel; Else Marie Vestergaard; Javier Miguelez; Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho; Erik A Sistermans; Mark D Pertile
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Lower detectability of non-invasive prenatal testing compared to prenatal diagnosis in high-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Qin Zhou; Bin Zhang; Ting Yin; Bin Yu; Lei-Lei Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 4.  Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results of sex chromosome abnormalities: Report of five cases and systematic review of evidence.

Authors:  Xiaolei Xie; Weihe Tan; Fuguang Li; Eric Carrano; Paola Ramirez; Autumn DiAdamo; Brittany Grommisch; Katherine Amato; Hongyan Chai; Jiadi Wen; Peining Li
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Olav B Petersen; Eric Smith; Diane Van Opstal; Marike Polak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Karin E M Diderich; Caterina M Bilardo; Lidia R Arends; Ida Vogel; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Comparison of Two Mappers and Influence in the Diagnostic Yield.

Authors:  Irene Gómez-Manjón; Ana Moreno-Izquierdo; Sonia Mayo; Marta Moreno-García; Aitor Delmiro; David Escribano; F Javier Fernández-Martínez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A rare Down syndrome foetus with de novo 21q;21q rearrangements causing false negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing: a case report.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Xu; Mei-Zhen Dai; Kai Wang; Yang Zhang; Fei-Yan Pan; Wei-Wu Shi
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Performance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in 1048 twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Yuan Cheng; Xinran Lu; Junxiang Tang; Jingran Li; Yuxiu Sun; Chaohong Wang; Jiansheng Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Genomic Diagnosis for Pediatric Disorders: Revolution and Evolution.

Authors:  Emilie Lalonde; Stefan Rentas; Fumin Lin; Matthew C Dulik; Cara M Skraban; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Strategies to minimize false positives and interpret novel microdeletions based on maternal copy-number variants in 87,000 noninvasive prenatal screens.

Authors:  Kristjan Eerik Kaseniit; Gregory J Hogan; Kevin M D'Auria; Carrie Haverty; Dale Muzzey
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.