Literature DB >> 29899373

Isochromosome 21q is overrepresented among false-negative cell-free DNA prenatal screening results involving Down syndrome.

Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam1, Lieve Page-Christiaens2, Nicola Flowers3, Michael D Bonifacio4, Katie M Battese Ellis4, Ida Vogel5, Else Marie Vestergaard5, Javier Miguelez6, Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho6, Erik A Sistermans7, Mark D Pertile8,9.   

Abstract

False-negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results involving Down syndrome are rare, but have high clinical impact on patients and their healthcare providers. Understanding the biology behind these results may allow for improved diagnostic follow-up and counseling. In 5 different centers offering cfDNA prenatal screening, 9 false-negative results were documented in 646 confirmed cases of trisomy 21; a false-negative rate of 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7-2.6). False-negative results included 4 cases of classical trisomy 21 and 5 cases with a de novo 21q;21q rearrangement. Two out of five rearrangements had molecular studies and were confirmed as isochromosomes. When combined with reports from the cfDNA screening literature, 8 out of 29 (28%) Down syndrome cases with a false-negative "non-invasive prenatal test" (NIPT) were associated with a 21q;21q rearrangement, compared with 2% reported in live born children with Down syndrome. In our laboratory series, evidence for placental or fetal mosaicism was present in 3 out of 3 true-positive cases involving a 21q;21q rearrangement and was confirmed in one false-negative case where placental material was available for study. Isochromosome 21q rearrangements are thus overrepresented among false-negative cfDNA screening results involving Down syndrome. Postzygotic isochromosome formation leading to placental mosaicism provides a biological cause for the increased prevalence of these rearrangements among false-negative cases. For clinical practice, a low trisomic fraction (z-score or equivalent measure) relative to the fetal fraction suggests placental mosaicism. Care should be taken as these cases may not reflect confined placental mosaicism, but rather full trisomy in the presence of a placenta containing normal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29899373      PMCID: PMC6138668          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0188-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  31 in total

1.  Circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal serum appears to originate from cyto- and syncytio-trophoblastic cells. Case report.

Authors:  E Flori; B Doray; E Gautier; M Kohler; P Ernault; J Flori; J M Costa
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Noninvasive prenatal testing of fetal aneuploidies by massively parallel sequencing in a prospective Chinese population.

Authors:  Yijun Song; Congcong Liu; Hong Qi; Yunping Zhang; Xuming Bian; Juntao Liu
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Two cases of placental T21 mosaicism: challenging the detection limits of non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Yanlin Wang; Jiansheng Zhu; Yan Chen; Shoulian Lu; Biliang Chen; Xinrong Zhao; Yi Wu; Xu Han; Duan Ma; Zhongyin Liu; David Cram; Weiwei Cheng
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; A Syngelaki; M Gil; V Atanasova; D Markova
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood at 10-11 weeks' gestation and the combined test at 11-13 weeks.

Authors:  M S Quezada; M M Gil; C Francisco; G Oròsz; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146,958 pregnancies.

Authors:  H Zhang; Y Gao; F Jiang; M Fu; Y Yuan; Y Guo; Z Zhu; M Lin; Q Liu; Z Tian; H Zhang; F Chen; T K Lau; L Zhao; X Yi; Y Yin; W Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; R Lamar Parker; Jeffrey Wentworth; Rajeevi Madankumar; Craig Saffer; Anita F Das; Joseph A Craig; Darya I Chudova; Patricia L Devers; Keith W Jones; Kelly Oliver; Richard P Rava; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  WISECONDOR: detection of fetal aberrations from shallow sequencing maternal plasma based on a within-sample comparison scheme.

Authors:  Roy Straver; Erik A Sistermans; Henne Holstege; Allerdien Visser; Cees B M Oudejans; Marcel J T Reinders
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Initial clinical laboratory experience in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma DNA samples.

Authors:  Tracy Futch; John Spinosa; Sucheta Bhatt; Eileen de Feo; Richard P Rava; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.

Authors:  Dick Oepkes; G C Lieve Page-Christiaens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Catia M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Audrey B C Coumans; Brigitte H Faas; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Attie T Go; Lidewij Henneman; Merryn V E Macville; Eva Pajkrt; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Diane Van Opstal; E J Joanne Verweij; Marjan M Weiss; Erik A Sistermans
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  5 in total

1.  A rare Down syndrome foetus with de novo 21q;21q rearrangements causing false negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing: a case report.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Xu; Mei-Zhen Dai; Kai Wang; Yang Zhang; Fei-Yan Pan; Wei-Wu Shi
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.063

2.  Performance of cell-free DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing: experience on 36,456 singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Authors:  Marco La Verde; Luigia De Falco; Annalaura Torella; Giovanni Savarese; Pasquale Savarese; Raffaella Ruggiero; Anna Conte; Vera Fico; Marco Torella; Antonio Fico
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 3.  Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review.

Authors:  Cechuan Deng; Shanling Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Incidental finding of maternal malignancy in an unusual non-invasive prenatal test and a review of similar cases.

Authors:  Maria Hammer Moellgaard; Ida Charlotte Bay Lund; Naja Becher; Anne-Bine Skytte; Lotte Andreasen; Malgorzata Ilona Srebniak; Ida Vogel
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-10-11

5.  Failure of NIPT to detect constitutional chromoanasynthesis involving chromosome 21 in a case of fetal hydrops-A case report.

Authors:  Kathleen Bone; Melissa Jean MacPherson; Judy Chernos; Julie Lauzon
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.