Literature DB >> 28382658

Regional assessment of in vivo myocardial stiffness using 3D magnetic resonance elastography in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Shivaram P Arunachalam1, Arvin Arani1, Francis Baffour1, Joseph A Rysavy2, Phillip J Rossman1, Kevin J Glaser1, David S Lake3, Joshua D Trzasko1, Armando Manduca3, Kiaran P McGee1, Richard L Ehman1, Philip A Araoz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The stiffness of a myocardial infarct affects the left ventricular pump function and remodeling. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive imaging technique for measuring soft-tissue stiffness in vivo. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of assessing in vivo regional myocardial stiffness with high-frequency 3D cardiac MRE in a porcine model of myocardial infarction, and compare the results with ex vivo uniaxial tensile testing.
METHODS: Myocardial infarct was induced in a porcine model by embolizing the left circumflex artery. Fourteen days postinfarction, MRE imaging was performed in diastole using an echocardiogram-gated spin-echo echo-planar-imaging sequence with 140-Hz vibrations and 3D MRE processing. The MRE stiffness and tensile modulus from uniaxial testing were compared between the remote and infarcted myocardium.
RESULTS: Myocardial infarcts showed increased in vivo MRE stiffness compared with remote myocardium (4.6 ± 0.7 kPa versus 3.0 ± 0.6 kPa, P = 0.02) within the same pig. Ex vivo uniaxial mechanical testing confirmed the in vivo MRE results, showing that myocardial infarcts were stiffer than remote myocardium (650 ± 80 kPa versus 110 ± 20 kPa, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of assessing in vivo regional myocardial stiffness with high-frequency 3D cardiac MRE. Magn Reson Med 79:361-369, 2018.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac MRE; cardiac elastography; heart failure; magnetic resonance elastography; myocardial infarction; myocardial stiffness; shear modulus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28382658      PMCID: PMC5628104          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  36 in total

1.  Random walks for image segmentation.

Authors:  Leo Grady
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Functional implications of myocardial scar structure.

Authors:  J W Holmes; J A Nuñez; J W Covell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-05

3.  Shear-wave amplitudes measured with cardiac MR elastography for diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Thomas Elgeti; Fabian Knebel; Robert Hättasch; Bernd Hamm; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; R L Ehman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  An octahedral shear strain-based measure of SNR for 3D MR elastography.

Authors:  M D J McGarry; E E W Van Houten; P R Perriñez; A J Pattison; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  In vivo magnetic resonance elastography to estimate left ventricular stiffness in a myocardial infarction induced porcine model.

Authors:  Ria Mazumder; Samuel Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Alan S Litsky; Bradley D Clymer; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Magnetic resonance elastography as a method to estimate myocardial contractility.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Shivani R Aggarwal; Kiaran P McGee; Nandan Anavekar; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  In vivo assessment of MR elastography-derived effective end-diastolic myocardial stiffness under different loading conditions.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Nandan Anavekar; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Measuring age-dependent myocardial stiffness across the cardiac cycle using MR elastography: A reproducibility study.

Authors:  Peter A Wassenaar; Chethanya N Eleswarpu; Samuel A Schroeder; Xiaokui Mo; Brian D Raterman; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A novel arresting solution for study of postmortem pressure--volume curves of the rat left ventricle.

Authors:  D G Rabkin; C X Jia; S E Cabreriza; J P Hart; J P Starr; H M Spotnitz
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  11 in total

1.  Microenvironment stiffness requires decellularized cardiac extracellular matrix to promote heart regeneration in the neonatal mouse heart.

Authors:  Xinming Wang; Subhadip Senapati; Akinola Akinbote; Bhargavee Gnanasambandam; Paul S-H Park; Samuel E Senyo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Regional and temporal changes in left ventricular strain and stiffness in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  William M Torres; Julia Jacobs; Heather Doviak; Shayne C Barlow; Michael R Zile; Tarek Shazly; Francis G Spinale
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Non-invasive Measurement of Dynamic Myocardial Stiffness Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kakkad; Melissa LeFevre; Peter Hollender; Joseph Kisslo; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Estimation of transversely isotropic material properties from magnetic resonance elastography using the optimised virtual fields method.

Authors:  Renee Miller; Arunark Kolipaka; Martyn P Nash; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Biomechanical assessment of myocardial infarction using optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Shang Wang; Manmohan Singh; Thuy Tien Tran; John Leach; Salavat R Aglyamov; Irina V Larina; James F Martin; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Shear wave cardiovascular MR elastography using intrinsic cardiac motion for transducer-free non-invasive evaluation of myocardial shear wave velocity.

Authors:  Marian Amber Troelstra; Jurgen Henk Runge; Emma Burnhope; Alessandro Polcaro; Christian Guenthner; Torben Schneider; Reza Razavi; Tevfik F Ismail; Jordi Martorell; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Microenvironment Stiffness Amplifies Post-ischemia Heart Regeneration in Response to Exogenous Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Neonatal Mice.

Authors:  Xinming Wang; Valinteshley Pierre; Subhadip Senapati; Paul S-H Park; Samuel E Senyo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance elastography: A review.

Authors:  Saad Khan; Faisal Fakhouri; Waqas Majeed; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Cardiac MR elastography using reduced-FOV, single-shot, spin-echo EPI.

Authors:  Yi Sui; Shivaram P Arunachalam; Arvin Arani; Joshua D Trzasko; Phillip M Young; James F Glockner; Kevin J Glaser; David S Lake; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Phillip J Rossman; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Inflammatory Cytokines Alter Mesenchymal Stem Cell Mechanosensing and Adhesion on Stiffened Infarct Heart Tissue After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Peng Wu; Changchen Xiao; Wei Hu; Tongtong Zhang; Xinyang Hu; Wei Chen; Jian'an Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.