Myriam Ferrari1, Vittorio Pengo2, Massimiliano Barolo1, Fabrizio Bezzo1, Roberto Padrini3. 1. Computer-Aided Process Engineering Laboratory (CAPE-lab), Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padua, Italy. 2. Department of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova Medical School, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. 3. Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova Medical School, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. roberto.padrini@unipd.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a new pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to characterise the contribution of (S)- and (R)-warfarin to the anticoagulant effect on patients in treatment with rac-warfarin. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients starting warfarin (W) therapy were studied, from the first dose and during chronic treatment at INR stabilization. Plasma concentrations of (S)- and (R)-W and INRs were measured 12, 36 and 60 h after the first dose and at steady state 12-14 h after dosing. Patients were also genotyped for the G>A VKORC1 polymorphism. The PK-PD model assumed a linear relationship between W enantiomer concentration and INR and included a scaling factor k to account for a different potency of (R)-W. Two parallel compartment chains with different transit times (MTT1 and MTT2) were used to model the delay in the W effect. PD parameters were estimated with the maximum likelihood approach. RESULTS: The model satisfactorily described the mean time-course of INR, both after the initial dose and during long-term treatment. (R)-W contributed to the rac-W anticoagulant effect with a potency of about 27% that of (S)-W. This effect was independent of VKORC1 genotype. As expected, the slope of the PK/PD linear correlation increased stepwise from GG to GA and from GA to AA VKORC1 genotype (0.71, 0.90 and 1.49, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our PK-PD linear model can quantify the partial pharmacodynamic activity of (R)-W in patients contemporaneously exposed to therapeutic (S)-W plasma levels. This concept may be useful in improving the performance of future algorithms aiming at identifying the most appropriate W maintenance dose.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop a new pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to characterise the contribution of (S)- and (R)-warfarin to the anticoagulant effect on patients in treatment with rac-warfarin. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients starting warfarin (W) therapy were studied, from the first dose and during chronic treatment at INR stabilization. Plasma concentrations of (S)- and (R)-W and INRs were measured 12, 36 and 60 h after the first dose and at steady state 12-14 h after dosing. Patients were also genotyped for the G>A VKORC1 polymorphism. The PK-PD model assumed a linear relationship between W enantiomer concentration and INR and included a scaling factor k to account for a different potency of (R)-W. Two parallel compartment chains with different transit times (MTT1 and MTT2) were used to model the delay in the W effect. PD parameters were estimated with the maximum likelihood approach. RESULTS: The model satisfactorily described the mean time-course of INR, both after the initial dose and during long-term treatment. (R)-W contributed to the rac-W anticoagulant effect with a potency of about 27% that of (S)-W. This effect was independent of VKORC1 genotype. As expected, the slope of the PK/PD linear correlation increased stepwise from GG to GA and from GA to AA VKORC1 genotype (0.71, 0.90 and 1.49, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our PK-PD linear model can quantify the partial pharmacodynamic activity of (R)-W in patients contemporaneously exposed to therapeutic (S)-W plasma levels. This concept may be useful in improving the performance of future algorithms aiming at identifying the most appropriate W maintenance dose.
Authors: A-K Hamberg; M Wadelius; J D Lindh; M L Dahl; R Padrini; P Deloukas; A Rane; E N Jonsson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: A-K Hamberg; M-L Dahl; M Barban; M G Scordo; M Wadelius; V Pengo; R Padrini; E N Jonsson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Khagendra Dahal; Sharan P Sharma; Erik Fung; Juyong Lee; Jason H Moore; John N Unterborn; Scott M Williams Journal: Chest Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: John Maddison; Andrew A Somogyi; Berit P Jensen; Heather M James; Melanie Gentgall; Paul E Rolan Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Steven Lane; Sameh Al-Zubiedi; Ellen Hatch; Ivan Matthews; Andrea L Jorgensen; Panos Deloukas; Ann K Daly; B Kevin Park; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro; Farhad Kamali; Dyfrig Hughes; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jubby Marcela Galvez; Carlos Martin Restrepo; Nora Constanza Contreras; Clara Alvarado; Carlos-Alberto Calderón-Ospina; Nidia Peña; Ricardo A Cifuentes; Daniela Duarte; Paul Laissue; Dora Janeth Fonseca Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med Date: 2018-10-16