Literature DB >> 28378852

Effects of non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) sweeteners on 24-h glucose profiles.

S L Tey1, N B Salleh1, C J Henry1,2, C G Forde1,3.   

Abstract

Replacing nutritive sweetener with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has the potential to improve glycaemic control. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of consuming artificial NNS (that is, aspartame), natural NNS (that is, monk fruit and stevia), and sucrose-sweetened beverages on 24-h glucose profiles. Ten healthy males took part in this randomised, crossover study with the following four treatments: aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia-, and sucrose- (65 g) sweetened beverages. Participants were asked to consume the test beverage as a preload mid-morning. Medtronic iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring system was used to measure mean 24-h glucose, incremental area under the curve (iAUC) and total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability. Overall no significant differences were found in mean 24-h glucose, iAUC and total AUC for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability between the four test beverages. Twenty-four-hour glucose profiles did not differ between beverages sweetened with non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) and nutritive sweeteners. The simple exchange of a single serving of sucrose-sweetened beverage with NNS over a day appears to have minimal effect on 24-h glucose profiles in healthy males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28378852     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  A low glycemic diet significantly improves the 24-h blood glucose profile in people with type 2 diabetes, as assessed using the continuous glucose MiniMed monitor.

Authors:  Audrey E Brynes; Jennifer L Lee; Rosanna E Brighton; Anthony R Leeds; Anne Dornhorst; Gary S Frost
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Nonnutritive sweeteners: current use and health perspectives: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Christopher Gardner; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Samuel S Gidding; Lyn M Steffen; Rachel K Johnson; Diane Reader; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The beneficial effect of a diet with low glycaemic index on 24 h glucose profiles in healthy young people as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Audrey E Brynes; Jacqui Adamson; Anne Dornhorst; Gary S Frost
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Low-glycaemic index sweetener-based beverages reduce 24-h glucose profiles in healthy adults.

Authors:  C J K Henry; K J Newens; H J Lightowler
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 5.  Substitution of sugar-sweetened beverages with other beverage alternatives: a review of long-term health outcomes.

Authors:  Miaobing Zheng; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Anna Rangan
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Effect of low-glycemic-sugar-sweetened beverages on glucose metabolism and macronutrient oxidation in healthy men.

Authors:  J Kahlhöfer; J Karschin; H Silberhorn-Bühler; N Breusing; A Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Effects of aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages on postprandial glucose, insulin and energy intake.

Authors:  S L Tey; N B Salleh; J Henry; C G Forde
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Hormonal responses to non-nutritive sweeteners in water and diet soda.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Rebecca J Brown; Jenny E Blau; Mary Walter; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.169

9.  Non-nutritive sweeteners: no class effect on the glycaemic or appetite responses to ingested glucose.

Authors:  C E Bryant; L K Wasse; N Astbury; G Nandra; J T McLaughlin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Trends in use, pharmacology, and clinical applications of emerging herbal nutraceuticals.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Williamson; Xinmin Liu; Angelo A Izzo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Sweetened beverages are associated with a higher risk of differentiated thyroid cancer in the EPIC cohort: a dietary pattern approach.

Authors:  Raul Zamora-Ros; Valerie Cayssials; Ramon Clèries; Maria Torrents; Graham Byrnes; Elisabete Weiderpass; Maria Sandström; Martin Almquist; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Anne Tjønneland; Cecilie Kyrø; Verena A Katzke; Charlotte Le Cornet; Giovanna Masala; Vittorio Krogh; Gabriella Iannuzzo; Rosario Tumino; Lorenzo Milani; Guri Skeie; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Pilar Amiano; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Suzanne Janzi; Linda Eriksson; Heinz Freisling; Alicia K Heath; Sabina Rinaldi; Antonio Agudo
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.865

Review 3.  Natural Alternative Sweeteners and Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Emily Mejia; Michelle Pearlman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Consumption of a Beverage Containing Aspartame and Acesulfame K for Two Weeks Does Not Adversely Influence Glucose Metabolism in Adult Males and Females: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Chronic Intake of Energy Drinks and Their Sugar Free Substitution Similarly Promotes Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Liam T Graneri; John C L Mamo; Zachary D'Alonzo; Virginie Lam; Ryusuke Takechi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Effects of Consuming Preloads with Different Energy Density and Taste Quality on Energy Intake and Postprandial Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Nurhazwani Salleh; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry; Ciaran G Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Effects of preferred music on physiological responses, perceived exertion, and anaerobic threshold determination in an incremental running test on both sexes.

Authors:  Felipe Marroni Rasteiro; Leonardo Henrique Dalcheco Messias; Pedro Paulo Menezes Scariot; João Pedro Cruz; Rafael Lucas Cetein; Claudio Alexandre Gobatto; Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.