BACKGROUND: Excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has become an intractable public health concern worldwide, making investigation of healthy beverage alternatives for SSBs imperative. AIM: To summarize the available evidence on the effects of replacing SSBs with beverage alternatives on long-term health outcomes. METHOD: We systematically retrieved studies from six electronic databases from inception to November 2013. Prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of substituting beverage alternatives for SSBs on long-term health outcomes in both children and adults were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 50 methodology checklists. RESULTS: Six cohort studies and four RCTs were included in the systematic review with the quality rating ranging from acceptable to high. Evidence from both cohort studies and RCTs showed substitution of SSBs by various beverage alternatives was associated with long-term lower energy intake and lower weight gain. However, evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the effect of beverage substitution on other health outcomes, and which beverage alternative is the best choice. CONCLUSIONS: Although studies on this topic are sparse, the available evidence suggests a potential beneficial effect on body weight outcomes when SSBs are replaced by water or low-calorie beverages. Further studies in this area are warranted to fully understand the long-term health implications of beverage substitutions.
BACKGROUND: Excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has become an intractable public health concern worldwide, making investigation of healthy beverage alternatives for SSBs imperative. AIM: To summarize the available evidence on the effects of replacing SSBs with beverage alternatives on long-term health outcomes. METHOD: We systematically retrieved studies from six electronic databases from inception to November 2013. Prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of substituting beverage alternatives for SSBs on long-term health outcomes in both children and adults were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 50 methodology checklists. RESULTS: Six cohort studies and four RCTs were included in the systematic review with the quality rating ranging from acceptable to high. Evidence from both cohort studies and RCTs showed substitution of SSBs by various beverage alternatives was associated with long-term lower energy intake and lower weight gain. However, evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the effect of beverage substitution on other health outcomes, and which beverage alternative is the best choice. CONCLUSIONS: Although studies on this topic are sparse, the available evidence suggests a potential beneficial effect on body weight outcomes when SSBs are replaced by water or low-calorie beverages. Further studies in this area are warranted to fully understand the long-term health implications of beverage substitutions.
Authors: Lenka H Shriver; Barbara J Marriage; Tama D Bloch; Colleen K Spees; Samantha A Ramsay; Rosanna P Watowicz; Christopher A Taylor Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Pablo Pérez-Martínez; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Vasilios G Athyros; Mónica Bullo; Patrick Couture; María I Covas; Lawrence de Koning; Javier Delgado-Lista; Andrés Díaz-López; Christian A Drevon; Ramón Estruch; Katherine Esposito; Montserrat Fitó; Marta Garaulet; Dario Giugliano; Antonio García-Ríos; Niki Katsiki; Genovefa Kolovou; Benoît Lamarche; Maria Ida Maiorino; Guillermo Mena-Sánchez; Araceli Muñoz-Garach; Dragana Nikolic; José M Ordovás; Francisco Pérez-Jiménez; Manfredi Rizzo; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Helmut Schröder; Francisco J Tinahones; Rafael de la Torre; Ben van Ommen; Suzan Wopereis; Emilio Ros; José López-Miranda Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Fumiaki Imamura; Matthias B Schulze; Stephen J Sharp; Marcela Guevara; Dora Romaguera; Benedetta Bendinelli; Elena Salamanca-Fernández; Eva Ardanaz; Larraitz Arriola; Dagfinn Aune; Heiner Boeing; Courtney Dow; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Heinz Freisling; Paula Jakszyn; Rudolf Kaaks; Kay-Tee Khaw; Tilman Kühn; Francesca R Mancini; Giovanna Masala; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Valeria M Pala; Salvatore Panico; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Jose R Quirós; Fulvio Ricceri; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Olov Rolandsson; Ivonne Sluijs; Magdalena Stepien; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Anne Tjønneland; Tammy Y N Tong; Rosario Tumino; Linda E T Vissers; Heather A Ward; Claudia Langenberg; Elio Riboli; Nita G Forouhi; Nick J Wareham Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Bradley M Appelhans; Ana Baylin; Mei-Hua Huang; Hong Li; Imke Janssen; Rasa Kazlauskaite; Elizabeth F Avery; Howard M Kravitz Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy; Wen You; Kathleen J Porter; Paul A Estabrooks; Jamie M Zoellner Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lale A Ertuglu; Baris Afsar; Abdullah B Yildiz; Atalay Demiray; Alberto Ortiz; Adrian Covic; Mehmet Kanbay Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2021-09-30
Authors: Crystal R Smit; Rebecca Nh de Leeuw; Kirsten E Bevelander; William J Burk; Laura Buijs; Thabo J van Woudenberg; Moniek Buijzen Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 4.022