Cesare Zoia1, Daniele Bongetta2, Jacopo C Poli3, Mariarosaria Verlotta4, Raffaelino Pugliese1, Paolo Gaetani1. 1. Neurosurgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. 2. Neurosurgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy. 3. Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy. 4. Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study intends to evaluate whether regional common habits or differences in case-volume between surgeons are significative variables in the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: An e-mail survey was sent to all neurosurgeons working in Lombardy, Italy's most populated region. The survey consisted of 17 questions about the perioperative management of lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent (47%) out of 206 Lombard neurosurgeons answered the survey. Although in some respects there is clear evidence in current literature on which is the best practice to adopt for an optimal management strategy, we noticed substantial differences between respondents, not only between hospitals but also between surgeons from the same hospital. Still, no differences were evident in a high vs low case-volume comparison. CONCLUSION: We identified no regional clusterization as for practical principles in the perioperative management of lumbar disc herniation and neither was case-volume a significative variable. Other causes may be relevant in the variability between the perioperative management and the outcomes achieved by different specialists.
BACKGROUND: This study intends to evaluate whether regional common habits or differences in case-volume between surgeons are significative variables in the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: An e-mail survey was sent to all neurosurgeons working in Lombardy, Italy's most populated region. The survey consisted of 17 questions about the perioperative management of lumbar disc herniation. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent (47%) out of 206 Lombard neurosurgeons answered the survey. Although in some respects there is clear evidence in current literature on which is the best practice to adopt for an optimal management strategy, we noticed substantial differences between respondents, not only between hospitals but also between surgeons from the same hospital. Still, no differences were evident in a high vs low case-volume comparison. CONCLUSION: We identified no regional clusterization as for practical principles in the perioperative management of lumbar disc herniation and neither was case-volume a significative variable. Other causes may be relevant in the variability between the perioperative management and the outcomes achieved by different specialists.
Entities:
Keywords:
discectomy; lumbar disc herniation; sciatica; surgery
Authors: Maurits van Tulder; Annette Becker; Trudy Bekkering; Alan Breen; Maria Teresa Gil del Real; Allen Hutchinson; Bart Koes; Even Laerum; Antti Malmivaara Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Andrea Rigamonti; Marco Gemma; Aleandro Rocca; Melissa Messina; Elena Bignami; Luigi Beretta Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Michelle J Clarke; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.654