Literature DB >> 28377854

Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT® Code 27279.

Morgan Lorio1, Melissa Martinson2, Lisa Ferrara3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint arthrodesis ("MI SIJ fusion") received a Category I CPT® code (27279) effective January 1, 2015 and was assigned a work relative value unit ("RVU") of 9.03. The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery ("ISASS") conducted a study consisting of a Rasch analysis of two separate surveys of surgeons to assess the accuracy of the assigned work RVU.
METHODS: A survey was developed and sent to ninety-three ISASS surgeon committee members. Respondents were asked to compare CPT® 27279 to ten other comparator CPT® codes reflective of common spine surgeries. The survey presented each comparator CPT® code with its code descriptor as well as the description of CPT® 27279 and asked respondents to indicate whether CPT® 27279 was greater, equal, or less in terms of work effort than the comparator code. A second survey was sent to 557 U.S.-based spine surgeon members of ISASS and 241 spine surgeon members of the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery ("SMISS"). The design of the second survey mirrored that of the first survey except for the use of a broader set of comparator CPT® codes (27 vs. 10). Using the work RVUs of the comparator codes, a Rasch analysis was performed to estimate the relative difficulty of CPT® 27279, after which the work RVU of CPT® 27279 was estimated by regression analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty surgeons responded to the first survey and thirty-four surgeons responded to the second survey. The results of the regression analysis of the first survey indicate a work RVU for CPT® 27279 of 14.36 and the results of the regression analysis of the second survey indicate a work RVU for CPT® 27279 of 14.1.
CONCLUSION: The Rasch analysis indicates that the current work RVU assigned to CPT® 27279 is undervalued at 9.03. Averaging the results of the regression analyses of the two surveys indicates a work RVU for CPT® 27279 of 14.23.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cpt code 27279; fusion; rasch; ruc; sacroiliac joint

Year:  2016        PMID: 28377854      PMCID: PMC5374999          DOI: 10.14444/3040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  5 in total

1.  Rasch analysis in measurement of physician work.

Authors:  R E Florin
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  2000

2.  How Much Work Effort is Involved in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion?

Authors:  Tara Garber; Charles G T Ledonio; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  The use of intraservice work per unit of time (IWPUT) and the building block method (BBM) for the calculation of surgical work.

Authors:  Charles D Mabry; Barton C McCann; Jean A Harris; Janet Martin; John O Gage; Josef E Fischer; Frank G Opelka; Robert Zwolak; Karen Borman; John T Preskitt; Paul E Collicott; Lamar McGinnis; Isidore Cohn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Results, potential effects, and implementation issues of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; N L Kelly; E R Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The first stage of developing preference-based measures: constructing a health-state classification using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Tracey Young; Yaling Yang; John E Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya; Karin Coyne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Comparing Relative Value Units among Shoulder Arthroplasty, Hemiarthroplasty, and ORIF for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Which is Most Worth Your Time?

Authors:  Marine Coste; Vineet Aggarwal; Neil V Shah; David Kim; Omar K Hariri; Louis M Day; Scott C Pascal; Jaydev B Mistry; William P Urban; William R Aibinder; Arvind G Von Keudell; Nishant Suneja
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-07

3.  Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Sarah E Dalton; Luke J Garbarino; Peter A Gold; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Jared M Newman; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Morad Chughtai; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.