Literature DB >> 15912042

The use of intraservice work per unit of time (IWPUT) and the building block method (BBM) for the calculation of surgical work.

Charles D Mabry1, Barton C McCann, Jean A Harris, Janet Martin, John O Gage, Josef E Fischer, Frank G Opelka, Robert Zwolak, Karen Borman, John T Preskitt, Paul E Collicott, Lamar McGinnis, Isidore Cohn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We will review the contribution to the Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS) by the techniques of intensity of work per unit of time (IWPUT), the building block methodology (BBM), and the work accomplished by the American College of Surgeons General Surgery Coding & Reimbursement Committee (GSCRC) in using IWPUT/BBM to detect undervalued surgical procedures and recommend payment increases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The MFS has had a major impact on surgeons' income since its introduction in 1992 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and additionally has been adopted for use by many commercial insurers. A major component of MFS is physician work, measured as the relative value of work (RVW), which has 2 components: time and intensity. These components are incorporated by: RVW = time x intensity.
METHODS: This work formula can be rearranged to give the IWPUT, which has become a powerful tool to calculate the amount of RVW performed by physicians. Most procedures are valued by the total RVW in the global surgical package, which includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative care for a time after surgery. Summing these perioperative components into RVW is called the building block methodology (BBM).
RESULTS: Using these techniques, the GSCRC increased the values for 314 surgery procedures during a recent CMS 5-year review, resulting in an increase to general surgeons of roughly 76 million dollars annually.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of IWPUT/BBM has been instrumental to correct payment for undervalued surgical procedures. They are powerful methods to measure RVW across specialties and to solve reimbursement, compensation, and practice management problems facing surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15912042      PMCID: PMC1357172          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000165201.06970.0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

1.  Rasch analysis in measurement of physician work.

Authors:  R E Florin
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  2000

2.  On the cutting edge of reimbursement strategies: the ACS develops new techniques.

Authors:  C D Mabry
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-06

3.  In their own words. The Five-Year Review, E&M services, and ACS leadership.

Authors:  C D Mabry
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-06

4.  Vascular surgery and the Resource-based Relative Value Scale five-year review.

Authors:  R M Zwolak; H H Trout
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Resource-based relative values. An overview.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Dunn; E R Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT® Code 27279.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Melissa Martinson; Lisa Ferrara
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Jill Q Dworsky; Marcia M Russell; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Medicare reimbursement trends from 2000 to 2020 in head and neck surgical oncology.

Authors:  Humzah A Quereshy; Brooke A Quinton; Claudia I Cabrera; Shawn Li; Akina Tamaki; Nicole Fowler
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.821

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.