Literature DB >> 3050171

Results, potential effects, and implementation issues of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

W C Hsiao1, P Braun, N L Kelly, E R Becker.   

Abstract

This article presents the overall results of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) study. We present resource-based relative values for selected services in each of the 18 specialties we studied. We found that preservice and postservice work represents close to 50% of total work for invasive services and 33% of total work for evaluation/management services. We also found that the work per unit time (a measure of intensity) for invasive services is about three times that of evaluation/management. We developed a simple model and simulated an RBRVS-based fee schedule for the Medicare program under a "budget-neutral" assumption. Results for 30 commonly performed services show that office visit fees for evaluation/management services could rise by 70%, while some surgical fees could drop by 60%. We also simulated what the Medicare outlays would have been in 1986 for categories of medical services under an RBRVS-based fee schedule. We found that total Medicare payments for evaluation/management services would have increased by about 56%. Invasive, imaging, and laboratory services would have decreased by 42%, 30%, and 5%, respectively. We also discuss implementation issues related to an RBRVS-based fee schedule, such as the determination of a monetary conversion factor, practice costs, billing codes, and the need to evaluate the potential impacts of an RBRVS-based payment system on the cost and quality of health care.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3050171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  8 in total

1.  Growing medical income disparities threaten fee-for-service medicine.

Authors:  D D Gellman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Physician payment reform--an idea whose time has come.

Authors:  P R Lee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-03

3.  Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT® Code 27279.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Melissa Martinson; Lisa Ferrara
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Refinement and expansion of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale: the second phase.

Authors:  E R Becker; D Dunn; P Braun; W C Hsiao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  PQRS and the MACRA: Value-Based Payments Have Moved from Concept to Reality.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; T M Leslie-Mazwi; G N Nicola; M Bhargavan-Chatfield; D J Seidenwurm; E Silva; L Manchikanti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Product definition for healthcare contracting: an overview of approaches to measuring hospital output with reference to the UK internal market.

Authors:  N Söderlund
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A critique of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  L F McMahon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Savings estimate for a Medicare insured group.

Authors:  H Birnbaum; S K Holland; G Lenhart; H L Reilly; K Hoffman; D P Pardo
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.