Literature DB >> 28374623

Retrospective Evaluation of a Technique for Patient-Customized Placement of Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

Jianing Wang1, Benoit M Dawant1, Robert F Labadie2, Jack H Noble1.   

Abstract

Objective Precurved electrode arrays (EAs) are commonly used in cochlear implants (CIs). Modiolar placement of such arrays has been shown to lead to better hearing outcomes. In this project, we retrospectively evaluated the modiolar positioning of EAs within a large CI imaging database. We aimed to discover the rate at which perimodiolar placement is successfully achieved and to evaluate a new technique we propose to preoperatively plan patient-customized EA insertion depths to improve perimodiolar placement at the time of surgery. Study Design Retrospective chart review and radiographic analysis. Setting Single tertiary academic referral center. Subjects and Methods Ninety-seven CI ears were evaluated. Perimodiolar positioning of electrodes was quantified using pre- and postimplantation computed tomography scans and automated image analysis techniques. Results Average perimodiolar distance was 0.59 ± 0.18 mm. Disagreement between the actual and our recommended insertion depth was found to be positively correlated with perimodiolar distance ( r = 0.49, P < .0001). Conclusions These results show that the average CI recipient with a precurved EA has a number of electrodes distant to the modiolus where they are not most effective. Our results also indicate the approach we propose for selecting patient-customized EA insertion depth would lead to better perimodiolar placement of precurved EAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D image analysis; cochlear implants; image-guided surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374623      PMCID: PMC5584996          DOI: 10.1177/0194599817697298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

Review 1.  How cochlear implants encode speech.

Authors:  Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma.

Authors:  Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006

6.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Automatic graph-based localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2015-11-20

8.  Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT.

Authors:  Yiyuan Zhao; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

9.  Analysis of intersubject variations in intracochlear and middle ear surface anatomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Stanley Pelosi; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  11 in total

1.  Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes.

Authors:  Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  William G Morrel; Jourdan T Holder; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Literature Review on the Distribution of Spiral Ganglion Cell Bodies inside the Human Cochlear Central Modiolar Trunk.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude N Jolly; Gunesh Rajan; Paul van de Heyning
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Preliminary Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Insertion Techniques.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Incidence of Complete Insertion in Cochlear Implant Recipients of Long Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.591

6.  Insertion Depth for Optimized Positioning of Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  Rueben A Banalagay; Robert F Labadie; Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Craig A Buchman; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Christopher K Giardina; Emily Buss; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Assessing Cochlear Implant Insertion Angle From an Intraoperative X-ray Using a Rotating 3D Helical Scala Tympani Model.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Michael W Canfarotta; Nicholas J Thompson; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Sarah E Hodge; Jenna Baker; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.